Elsevier

Geriatric Nursing

Volume 39, Issue 2, March–April 2018, Pages 191-198
Geriatric Nursing

Feature Article
A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Feasibility and Acceptability of an Adapted Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Home Care Patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.08.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Home care clinicians have an opportunity to improve care for post-hospitalization patients with cardiovascular disease. This mixed methods study examined the feasibility and acceptability of an adapted cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program for the home care setting. Surveys measuring patient self-care and knowledge were administered to patients (n = 46) at baseline and at 30-day follow-up. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (n = 28) and home care clinicians (n = 11) at completion of the program. All survey indicators demonstrated a trend towards improvement, with a statistically significant increase in the self-care management subscale (p = 0.002). Qualitative analyses identified three patient themes (self-awareness, nutrition, motivation) and three clinician themes (systematic approach, motivation, patient selection process). Incorporating CR into the home care setting proved to be a feasible and acceptable approach to increasing access to CR services among elderly patients.

Introduction

Current healthcare reform encourages innovative approaches to care, particularly for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of death in the United States.1, 2 Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) utilizes exercise, education, counseling on behavioral change, risk factor modification, and psychosocial well-being to reduce morality and risk of hospital readmission.3 However, only 13.9% of acute myocardial infarction patients and 31.0% of coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients attend CR post-hospitalization, with very low attendance rates among heart failure patients as well.4, 5 CVD is especially prevalent among home care patients, a population that tends to be elderly, functionally impaired, and clinically complex.6, 7 Home care is often the first line of rehabilitation and support for elderly patients post-hospitalization, providing an opportune setting for interventions similar to those received by patients who attend outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR).8, 9 Home-based and center-based cardiac rehabilitation are equally effective in improving both clinical outcomes, with no difference between findings in the two settings in short term exercise capacity, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, smoking behaviors, and cardiac events.10 Despite these proven clinical outcomes, most home care agencies have yet to offer structured CR programs within their practice due to a lack of reimbursement mechanism and the logistical challenges of incorporating CR within the limitations of a home care episode.9 Furthermore, there is limited research focusing on frail, elderly patients in CR programs.11 The Middle-Range Theory of Self-care describes health-promoting practices required for chronic illness management, with the key concepts being self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and self-care management.12 This theory depicts the importance of promoting maintenance behaviors (such as preparing healthy food or coping with stress) as well as understanding the management of the chronic illness (such as understanding that shortness of breath due to heart failure may require taking an extra diuretic), which we incorporated into our intervention.12 Based on the Middle Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness, we explored the possibility that incorporating adapted CR into a certified home health agency may have a positive impact on patients' self-care management by increasing their awareness of CVD and how to manage it.12 The Home Heart Health (HHH) program is an innovative approach to delivering adapted CR services to patients with CVD within the context of a home health agency. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the HHH program among patients and clinicians through qualitative interviews, and explore the impact of the intervention on patient self-care and knowledge of heart disease. We hypothesized that the HHH program will be accepted amongst patients and clinicians, and that the program will have a positive impact on patient self-care and knowledge of heart disease.

Section snippets

Design

A mixed methods design was used to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the HHH program, as well as explore preliminary patient outcomes. Patients and clinicians were recruited from a large not-for profit certified home health agency. Exploratory patient outcomes were assessed at 30-days post-baseline. Data on feasibility and acceptability were captured during qualitative interviews with patient and clinician participants. Qualitative data were collected during in-home patient

Participant characteristics

Patient characteristics and service use are shown in Table 3. The most common cardiac diagnosis code was for heart failure (40.0%), followed by aftercare for circulatory system surgery (22.2%), atrial fibrillation (20.0%), and coronary artery disease (11.1%). Of the patients enrolled for aftercare for circulatory system surgery (n = 10), four patients had undergone valve surgery and four patients had coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The remainder had an angioplasty or pacemaker insertion.

Discussion

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the HHH program, an adapted CR model for the home care setting, by exploring the programs' feasibility and acceptability. This study is based on current clinical barriers and implications, as well as a mid-range theory. The themes from the semi-structured interviews illustrated the feasibility and acceptability of the program, coupled with the patient survey data. Pre- and post-program surveys conducted with patients demonstrated improvements in the Self-Care

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the University of Pennsylvania President's Engagement Prize for supporting and funding the Home Heart Health initiative, and the Visiting Nurse Service of New York Center for Home Care Policy & Research for hosting the study. The authors also thank Dr. Barbara Riegel, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, and the content experts from NYU Langone Health and Visiting Nurse Service of New York for their guidance and support. A special thanks to the patients and

References (35)

  • J.L. Feinberg et al.

    Developing an adapted cardiac rehabilitation training for home care clinicians: patient perspectives, clinician knowledge, & curriculum overview

    J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev

    (2016)
  • J. Claes et al.

    Longer-term effects of home-based exercise interventions on exercise capacity and physical activity in coronary artery disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Eur J Prev Cardiol

    (2017)
  • C. Vigorito et al.

    Frailty and cardiac rehabilitation: a call to action from the EAPC Cardiac Rehabilitation Section

    Eur J Prev Cardiol

    (2016)
  • B. Riegel et al.

    A middle-range theory of self-care chronic illness

    Adv Nurs Sci

    (2012)
  • L. Hamm et al.

    Core competencies for cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention professionals: 2010 update: position statement of the American association of cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation

    J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev

    (2011)
  • M. O'Connor et al.

    The outcome and assessment information set (OASIS): a review of validity and reliability

    Home Health Care Serv Q

    (2012)
  • B. Riegel et al.

    Content validity testing of the self-care of chronic illness inventory

  • Cited by (8)

    • Cardiac rehabilitation: Appraisal of current evidence and utility of technology aided home-based cardiac rehabilitation

      2020, Indian Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some countries, including the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, have national healthcare coverage policies that endorse and cover either CBCR or HBCR for patients with various cardiac conditions. In the United States, insurance carriers, including the Centres for Medicare & Medicaid Services, have coverage policies that endorse and cover up to 36 sessions of CBCR; however, coverage does not generally include HBCR.91 In Indian subcontinent, health care services are provided by the combination of national healthcare and private healthcare services.

    • Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scientific Statement From the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology

      2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some countries, including the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, have national healthcare coverage policies that endorse and cover either CBCR or HBCR for patients with various cardiac conditions. In the United States, insurance carriers, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, have coverage policies that endorse and cover up to 36 sessions of CBCR; however, coverage does not generally include HBCR except when it is provided as part of home health services for homebound patients (i.e., those who are unable to leave home without considerable and taxing effort) who have a specific need that requires the skills of a licensed nurse or physical therapist (88a). Although some patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery meet these requirements, many patients eligible for CR do not.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding source: University of Pennsylvania President's Engagement Prize

    View full text