Elsevier

Geomorphology

Volume 199, 1 October 2013, Pages 214-224
Geomorphology

Review
Linking restoration ecology with coastal dune restoration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.05.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Restoration of coastal dunes is needed because of the impact of human activities.

  • Coastal dune restoration can be contrasting: re-vegetation and de-vegetation.

  • We explored how the success of these restoration actions has been analyzed.

  • We contrasted restoration with the ecological theory of natural succession.

  • Ecosystem integrity was monitored more frequently than health and sustainability.

Abstract

Restoration and preservation of coastal dunes is urgently needed because of the increasingly rapid loss and degradation of these ecosystems because of many human activities. These activities alter natural processes and coastal dynamics, eliminate topographic variability, fragment, degrade or eliminate habitats, reduce diversity and threaten endemic species. The actions of coastal dune restoration that are already taking place span contrasting activities that range from revegetating and stabilizing the mobile substrate, to removing plant cover and increasing substrate mobility. Our goal was to review how the relative progress of the actions of coastal dune restoration has been assessed, according to the ecosystem attributes outlined by the Society of Ecological Restoration: namely, integrity, health and sustainability and that are derived from the ecological theory of succession. We reviewed the peer reviewed literature published since 1988 that is listed in the ISI Web of Science journals as well as additional references, such as key books. We exclusively focused on large coastal dune systems (such as transgressive and parabolic dunefields) located on natural or seminatural coasts. We found 150 articles that included “coastal dune”, “restoration” and “revegetation” in areas such as title, keywords and abstract. From these, 67 dealt specifically with coastal dune restoration. Most of the studies were performed in the USA, The Netherlands and South Africa, during the last two decades. Restoration success has been assessed directly and indirectly by measuring one or a few ecosystem variables. Some ecosystem attributes have been monitored more frequently (ecosystem integrity) than others (ecosystem health and sustainability). Finally, it is important to consider that ecological succession is a desirable approach in restoration actions. Natural dynamics and disturbances should be considered as part of the restored system, to improve ecosystem integrity, health and sustainability.

Introduction

For millennia, the coastal environment has been one of the preferred settings for urban, industrial and maritime development, and more recently, for mining, tourism and recreation (Nordstrom, 2008). Nearly 40% of the world human population lives within 60 km from the coast (Martínez et al., 2007), and it is expected that human encroachment on the coast will increase to 60% by 2020 (UNCED, 1992). Such a continuously growing population will result in an increasing human impact with the degradation or loss of coastal ecosystems. Of these, sandy beaches and coastal dunes are among the most damaged by human activities. Indeed, these unique ecosystems are increasingly becoming trapped between the expanding human populations and the effects of global climate change, such as sea level rise (Defeo and de Alava, 1995, Cencini, 1998, Nordstrom, 2000, Schlacher et al., 2007). These pressures act across multiple dimensions in time and space, and result in ecological impacts that occur at many temporal and spatial scales so that today the vast majority of beaches and coastal dunes are threatened by human activities (Nordstrom, 2008, Defeo et al., 2009).

Coastal dunes are degraded and lost because of a wide array of human actions and activities (Ketchum, 1972, Nordstrom, 2008), which can be aggregated into six groups: 1) housing and recreation; 2) industrial and commercial use; 3) waste disposal; 4) agriculture; 5) mining and 6) military activities. Typically, they alter coastal dynamics and natural processes, eliminate topographic variability, fragment, degrade or eliminate habitats, reduce biodiversity and threaten endemic species (Nordstrom, 2000, Nordstrom, 2008, Ayyad, 2003, Martínez et al., 2006, Martínez et al., 2013a, Martínez et al., 2013b, De Luca et al., 2011, Faggi and Dadon, 2011).

The increasingly rapid loss and degradation of coastal dunes clearly shows the urgent need to preserve these ecosystems, and, as much as possible, restore those that have been degraded. Different actions are already taking place to restore coastal dunes, and they span contrasting activities that range from revegetating and stabilizing the mobile substrate, in one extreme, to removing plant cover and increasing substrate mobility in the other (Martínez et al., 2013a, Martínez et al., 2013b). With such a wide array of restoration possibilities, it is necessary to evaluate the progress and success of restoration with clearly established criteria. To address this problem for coastal dunes (and any other ecosystem that is being restored), the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER, 2004) produced a list of attributes that are associated with ecosystem integrity, health and sustainability and that can be used to measure restoration success (Table 1).

The elements on this list (Table 1) cover different stages of ecosystem development and can be associated with the ecological theory of natural succession: “the natural recovery of ecosystems after the impact of disturbances” (Connell and Slatyer, 1977, del Moral et al., 2007). According to the ecological theory, restoration and ecological succession are similar in the sense that they share several elements: site colonization (natural or after human intervention); vegetation establishment (natural or assisted); structuring of ecosystem cycles, species assembly and biotic interactions. Finally, in the last successional stages (or after long-term restoration), the ecosystem is structurally complex and relatively resilient (Fig. 1).

The ecosystem (naturally recovering or restored) develops through similar processes that affect the ecosystem integrity, health (functionality) and resilience. In early successional stages (or early restoration actions), colonization occurs after natural dispersal, from seed banks or because of human intervention (plantations). These early colonizers ameliorate the environment and facilitate the colonization of late colonizers, which become established and modify the physical environment even further. After establishment, different species assemblages are integrated, biotic interactions intensify and soils develop (Fig. 1). The ecosystem develops gradually through these events.

Some of the more measurable attributes that are frequently used to monitor the progress of restoration and hence, ecosystem development and recovery, include (SER, 2004): a) community structure and composition (integrity); b) a handful set of ecological processes, such as nutrient cycling and species turnover during plant succession (health); and c) the ability to recover after the impact of additional disturbances by means of natural regeneration of the restored ecosystem (sustainability). The success of restoration based on these attributes has been monitored before, but not in the context of coastal dunes. For example, Ruiz-Jaen and Aide (2005) analyzed how restoration success was being measured in restoration projects that had been published in the peer-reviewed journal: “Restoration Ecology” from 1993 to 2003. In general, they found that different elements were used to measure restoration success, but they were not always related to the three ecosystem attributes. They only registered two studies on coastal dune restoration that referred to restoration actions after mining in South Africa (van Aarde et al., 1996, van Aarde et al., 1998).

Because of the relevance of restoring coastal dunes and assessing the success of these restoration actions, our goal was to review how the relative progress of ecological restoration actions has been assessed for coastal dunes, according to the ecosystem attributes outlined by SER: namely, integrity, health and sustainability and that are derived from the ecological theory of natural succession (Gann and Lamb, 2006). Recommendations on new paths that are needed to improve the activities for coastal dune restoration were derived from this analysis.

Section snippets

Methods

Peer reviewed articles published between 1988 and 2012 were included in the assessment. Articles were extracted from four digital databases (ISI Web of Science, EBSCO, SCOPUS, and JSTOR). Articles from two journals that publish papers in restoration ecology (Ecological Restoration and Journal of Coastal Conservation) but are not abstracted in the databases were included in the assessment. Articles were extracted by searching the terms ‘coastal dune’, ‘restoration’ and ‘revegetation’ within the

General trends

Since 1988, we found a total of 150 articles. From these, only 67 evaluated restoration efforts or monitored restoration cases in non-urbanized landscapes (wilderness approach) and assessed the progress of restoration. The rest only mentioned “restoration” but these studies did not exactly focus on restoration but considered that the studies “might be useful” for restoration activities. Thus, these studies were omitted from our analyses. In general, the number of published articles on coastal

Coastal dune restoration: different aims and different methods

Coastal dune ecosystems are dynamic and diverse, and the geomorphic and ecological characteristics vary around the world. The flora and fauna that inhabit the many habitats found here is equally diverse and dynamic, as well as the disturbance drivers affecting these ecosystems. In consequence, the restoration of coastal dunes is neither simple nor straightforward: it involves a wide array of activities, because no single “best” way exists to restore a dune. Many scenarios of recovery and many

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by grant FOMIX Veracruz-CONACYT (37009) and SEMARNAT-CONACYT (23669). DL sincerely thanks the Mexican Government and CONACYT for her PhD scholarship (CONACYT 275429/224619). Martínez, Gallego-Fernández and Hesp thank their respective institutions for support. We also thank Dr. Karl Nordstrom and Dr. Nancy Jackson and the anonymous reviewers for their thorough reviews of the manuscript. No dunes were harmed in the creation of this paper.

References (126)

  • T. Mason et al.

    Moderate impacts of plant invasion and management regimes in coastal hind dune seed banks

    Biological Conservation

    (2007)
  • A.T.R. Acosta et al.

    Passive recovery of Mediterranean coastal dunes following limitations to human trampling

  • J. Andreu et al.

    Vegetation response after removal of the invasive Carpobrotus hybrid complex in Andalucía, Spain

    Ecological Restoration

    (2010)
  • S.M. Arens et al.

    Dune landscape rejuvenation by intended destabilisation in the Amsterdam water supply dunes

    Journal of Coastal Research

    (2006)
  • S.M. Arens et al.

    Restoration of dune mobility in the Netherlands

  • S.M. Arens et al.

    Restoration of dune mobility in the Netherlands

  • C. Bakker et al.

    Does the seed bank contribute to the restoration of species-rich vegetation in wet dune slacks?

    Applied Vegetation Science

    (2005)
  • B. Bossuyt et al.

    The role of soil seed banks in the restoration of dry acidic dune grassland after burning of Ulex europaeus scrub

    Applied Vegetation Science

    (2007)
  • A.D. Bradshaw

    Introduction and philosophy

  • S. Carpenter et al.

    From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?

    Ecosystems

    (2001)
  • T. Cater et al.

    Erosion control and restoration of a sand dune on the Colville River Delta, northern Alaska

    Ecological Restoration

    (2007)
  • C. Cencini

    Physical processes and human activities in the evolution of the Po Delta, Italy

    Journal of Coastal Research

    (1998)
  • Y.D. Choi

    Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: toward “futuristic” restoration

    Ecological Research

    (2004)
  • Y.D. Choi

    Restoration ecology to the future: a call for new paradigm

    Rest Ecology

    (2007)
  • S. Christensen et al.

    The lichen-rich coastal heath vegetation on the isle of Anholt, Denmark: description, history and development

    Journal of Coastal Conseil

    (2001)
  • A.F. Clewell et al.

    Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession (The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration Series)

    (2008)
  • A. Clewell et al.

    What practitioners need from restoration ecologists

    Rest Ecology

    (1997)
  • J.H. Connell et al.

    Mechanism of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization

    American Naturalist

    (1977)
  • C. Conser et al.

    Assessing the residual effects of Carpobrotus edulis invasion, implications for restoration

    Biological Invasions

    (2009)
  • M.A. Davis et al.

    The science and values of restoration ecology

    Rest Ecology

    (2004)
  • A. Davis et al.

    Convergence between dung beetle assemblages of a post-mining vegetational chronosequence and unmined dune forest

    Rest Ecology

    (2003)
  • M. De Lillis et al.

    Sustainability of sand dune restoration along the coast of the Tyrrhenian Sea

    Journal of Coastal Conservative

    (2004)
  • E. De Luca et al.

    Coastal dune systems and disturbance factors: monitoring and analysis in central Italy

    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

    (2011)
  • R. Deblinger et al.

    Preserving coastal biodiversity: the private, nonprofit approach

    Coastal Management

    (1991)
  • O. Defeo et al.

    Effects of human activities on long-term trends in sandy beach populations: the wedge clam Donax hanleyanus in Uruguay

    Marine Ecol Progress Series

    (1995)
  • R. del Moral et al.

    Insights gained from succession for the restoration of landscape structure and function

  • D.A. DellaSala et al.

    A citizen's call for ecological forest restoration: forest restoration principles and criteria

    Ecological Restoration

    (2003)
  • J.S. Denton et al.

    A recovery program for the Natterjack Toad (Bufo calamita) in Britain

    Conservation Biology

    (1997)
  • S. DeSimone

    Balancing active and passive restoration in a non-chemical, research-based approach to coastal sage scrub restoration in Southern California

    Ecological Restoration

    (2011)
  • S.I. Dewenter et al.

    Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set

    Oecologia

    (1999)
  • S.M. Emery et al.

    Ecological assessment of dune restorations in the Great Lakes Region

    Rest Ecology

    (2010)
  • W.H.O. Ernst et al.

    Pedogenesis in coastal wet dune slacks after sod-cutting in relation to revegetation

    Plant and Soil

    (1996)
  • A. Faggi et al.

    Temporal and spatial changes in plant dune diversity in urban resorts

    Journal of Coastal Conservative

    (2011)
  • R. Feagin

    Foredune restoration before and after hurricanes: inevitable destruction, certain reconstruction

  • K. French et al.

    Recruitment limitation of native species in invaded coastal dune communities

    Plant Ecology

    (2011)
  • G. Gómez-Piña et al.

    Sand dune management problems and techniques, Spain

    Journal of Coastal Research

    (2002)
  • M.H. Graham et al.

    Organic matter status and the size, activity and metabolic diversity of the soil microflora as indicators of the success of rehabilitation of mined sand dunes

    Biology and Fertility of Soils

    (2004)
  • M.J. Grainger et al.

    Is succession-based management of coastal dune forest restoration valid?

    Ecological Restoration

    (2012)
  • M.J. Grainger et al.

    Landscape composition influences the restoration of subtropical coastal dune forest

    Rest Ecology

    (2011)
  • Cited by (69)

    • Optimising restoration and rehabilitation using environmental and spatial drivers of plant assemblages

      2022, Landscape and Urban Planning
      Citation Excerpt :

      The restoration of plant assemblages, by planting native species and removing invasive species, in coastal dunes can have significant biodiversity benefits by, for example, increasing bird species richness by increasing structural complexity through plantings and creating more suitable habitat (Munro et al. 2011). Restoring coastal dune plant assemblages is therefore an important biodiversity and ecosystem service intervention for coastal managers (Lithgow et al. 2013). Rarely, however, have quantitative planning steps been undertaken to identify and/or prioritise key areas and actions for coastal dune restoration (Gilby et al. 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Current address: Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada, Mexico.

    View full text