Elsevier

Gene

Volume 497, Issue 2, 15 April 2012, Pages 320-322
Gene

Short Communication
A variant of unknown significance in the GLA gene causing diagnostic uncertainty in a young female with isolated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.01.056Get rights and content

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is genetically heterogeneous, and largely caused by mutations in genes encoding sarcomere proteins. However, GLA mutations causing Fabry disease, an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, may also present with isolated HCM. As HCM genetic testing panels are increasingly being used clinically, variants of unknown significance (VUS) are encountered, leading to challenges in interpretation. We present an illustrative case: a 10-year-old girl with isolated HCM who, on testing with a HCM multi-gene panel, was found to carry a maternally inherited p.W24R variant in GLA. Attempts to evaluate the significance of this variant, by direct biochemical testing of patient specimens, gave inconclusive results. Subsequent in vitro protein expression studies suggested that the variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. This case highlights diagnostic dilemmas that can be provoked by VUS in general, and specifically raises a question whether GLA sequencing should be included in first-line diagnostic testing for female children with isolated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Highlights

► Functional analysis of a variant of unknown significance (VUS). ► Reviewing the natural history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in Fabry disease. ► Discussing challenges created by VUS in clinically variable disorders.

Introduction

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) affects about 1 in 500 individuals (Maron et al., 1995), and is genetically heterogeneous. Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, due to the deficient activity of α-galactosidase A caused by mutations in the GLA gene. While classical FD is a multi-system disorder, some patients with FD present with isolated HCM. Three percent of males with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and up to 6% of men diagnosed with HCM after 40 years of age have FD (Nakao et al., 1995, Sachdev et al., 2002). A proportion of females diagnosed with HCM above the age of 40 years have FD (Chimenti et al., 2004). Differentiating FD from other genetic causes of HCM on clinical grounds can be very difficult. Such a distinction is clinically significant as FD is specifically treatable with enzyme replacement therapy, while cardiac medications commonly used in the treatment of HCM may be contraindicated in FD. Therefore some genetic testing panels clinically available for HCM include GLA, in addition to sarcomere-related genes which are more common causes of inherited HCM. Such panels offer a non-invasive route to resolve the differential diagnosis; however, it is not uncommon to encounter newly-identified variants, leading to challenges in evaluating their clinical significance. The case which we report demonstrates significant diagnostic challenges and dilemmas that resulted from a variant of unknown significance (VUS) in GLA identified by an HCM genetic testing panel.

Section snippets

Case report

A 10 year old girl was referred to the Pediatric Cardiology Clinic at British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH) for evaluation of a few weeks' history of exertional dyspnea and generalized fatigue. An ECG showed sinus rhythm with evidence of marked atrial hypertrophy, right axial deviation, right bundle branch block, and T-wave inversion in inferior leads. Chest X ray showed cardiomegaly, and echocardiography showed symmetric hypertrophy of the left and right ventricles with dilatation of the

Discussion

Evaluating potential pathogenicity of the variant identified in this patient was hampered by multiple challenges. Firstly, she belongs to a small family and is apparently the only affected individual. While the same variant was identified in the patient's 45-year-old mother, who has no evidence of HCM at present, this does not rule out pathogenicity of the variant, given the known intrafamilial variability of presentation of Fabry disease due in part to variable patterns of X inactivation.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (5)

  • The Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx (C-GUIDE): Preliminary evidence of validity and reliability

    2022, Genetics in Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    We developed 19 unique patient vignettes (Supplemental Material - Vignettes) to mimic the clinical scenarios for which C-GUIDE was designed. A geneticist worked with the study team to draft the vignettes; some were also informed by case reports in the literature.21-25 All vignettes provided explicit details about the diagnostic, prognostic, management, reproductive, or psychosocial impact of genetic test results to enable raters to respond to all C-GUIDE items (Version 1.1).

  • Enzymatic diagnosis of Fabry disease using a fluorometric assay on dried blood spots: An alternative methodology

    2013, European Journal of Medical Genetics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Interestingly, we recently demonstrated that Sanger sequencing can be performed using DBS as the source of DNA for PCR amplification (Hagege et al., 2011). The rapid development of massively parallel sequencing may soon provide an interesting alternative for sequencing individuals at risk of Fabry disease with the inclusion of GLA in gene panels, although the incidental discovery of variant of unknown significance may occasionally lead to diagnostic uncertainty (Al-Thihli et al., 2012). The modified method was successfully used for the screening of FD in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

1

Current address: Genetic and Developmental Medicine Clinic, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, P.O. Box 38, P.C 123, AlKhod, Oman.

View full text