doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.02.013
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
A Salmonella-based, propionate-inducible, expression system for Salmonella enterica
Sung Kuk Leea and Jay D. Keaslinga, b, c,
, 
aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
bDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
cSynthetic Biology Department, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Received 23 November 2005;
revised 17 February 2006;
accepted 22 February 2006.
Received by D.L. Court.
Available online 17 April 2006.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
The expression and regulatory properties of a propionate-regulated overexpression system (Salmonella enterica prpBCDE promoter (PprpB) and positive regulator (prpR)) were evaluated in wild-type S. enterica serovar Typhimurium TR6583 and prpB− or prpD− versions of this strain and compared with the arabinose-regulated T7 expression system. The wild-type strain showed low expression in the absence of propionate and high expression in the presence of propionate under all growth conditions. In 96-well plates and culture tubes, the wild-type strain exhibited a long delay before full induction; the time delay was significantly shorter in shake flasks. The prpD− strain exhibited low expression in the presence of glucose, highly regulatable expression over a wide range of propionate concentrations, and, in contrast to the wild-type strain, fast induction to full expression under all growth conditions. In contrast, the prpB− strain showed very high background expression in both culture tubes and shake flasks.
Keywords: Expression system; Inducible promoter; prpBCDE promoter; prpR; Salmonella enterica
Abbreviations: cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; CRP, cAMP receptor protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein; IHF, integration host factor; 2-MC, 2-methycitrate; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RBS, ribosome binding site; RFU, relative fluorescence units
 |
Fig. 1. Comparison of culture-average fluorescence of S. enterica SB300A#1 strains harboring the pET7-gfp (A), pPro7(E)-gfp (B), or pPro7(S)-gfp (C) grown in 96-well plates. Cells carrying the plasmid were grown overnight in LB medium at 37 °C and were subcultured (1:100) into fresh LB medium (5 ml) with ampicillin (100 μg/ml), grown at 37 °C in a shaking incubator until the OD600 reached about 0.5, and then exposed to different concentrations of inducer in 96-well plates at 37 °C with shaking in a Tecan SpectraFluor Plus plate reader. The data are raw; e.g., background fluorescence intensity was not removed by using background subtraction. Symbols indicate inducer concentrations. (A) Solid diamonds, 40 mM arabinose; solid rectangles, 20 mM; solid triangles, 10 mM; open circles, 0 mM. (B) and (C) Solid diamonds, 100 mM propionate; solid rectangles, 50 mM; solid triangles, 10 mM; open circles, 0 mM. The data are representative of three independent experiments. RFU, relative fluorescence units.
Fig. 2. Comparison of cell growth and GFP expression levels between the pPro and T7 expression systems in shaking flask experiment. S. enterica SB300A#1 harboring plasmid pET7-gfp (A) and S. enterica TR6583 (B), TRB (C), or TRD (D) harboring plasmid pPro7(S)-gfp. GFP expression levels and OD600 were determined using a Tecan SpectraFluor Plus plate reader after (1:5) dilution into LB medium. Open and solid symbols indicate cell growth and GFP production, respectively. Solid diamonds indicate GFP production in the presence of 0.4% glucose. Rectangles, 0 mM arabinose (A) or 0 mM propionate (B, C, D); circles, 15 mM arabinose (A) or 20 mM propionate (B, C, D). Error bars show the standard deviation of experiments performed in triplicate. RFU, relative fluorescence units.
Fig. 3. The culture-average fluorescence and cell growth of S. enterica strains TR6583 (A and B) and prpD mutant (C and D) harbouring pPro7(S)-gfp at various concentrations of propionate. This experiment was performed using the same culture method as described in Fig. 2. Symbols indicate propionate concentrations added into culture medium. Error bars show the standard deviation of experiments performed in triplicate.
Table 1.
E. coli or S. enterica strains and plasmids used in this study
