Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Review
Can RNA selection pressure distort the measurement of Ka / Ks?
Received 11 October 2005;
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Abstract
Recently, an interesting question has emerged in the evolutionary interpretation of sequence substitution data as evidence of amino acid selection pressure. Specifically, the Ka / Ks metric was designed to measure selection pressure on amino acid substitutions, assuming that the synonymous substitution rate Ks reflects the neutral nucleotide substitution rate. However, there is increasing evidence for selection pressure at silent sites due to constraints of RNA splicing. Is Ka / Ks an appropriate metric for selection pressure on amino acid substitutions, in the presence of other selection pressures acting only at the RNA level (such as selection for exonic splicing enhancers)? Or can the resulting decreases in Ks from such selection pressures introduce bias into the Ka / Ks metric, so that it no longer gives an accurate measure of amino acid level selection pressure? In this review, we present both mathematical models and empirical evidence for these divergent points of view.
Keywords: Evolution; Splicing; RNA; Synonymous substitutions; Nonsynonymous substitutions
Abbreviation: ESE, exonic splicing enhancer
Article Outline
- 1. Background: the Ka / Ks metric of amino acid selection pressure
- 2. BRCA1: can decreases in Ks cause increased Ka / Ks?
- 3. How might RNA selection pressure bias Ka / Ks?
- 4. Empirical data on “synonymous phasing” of splicing factor sites
- 5. Challenges: more experimental data are needed for validated splicing factor sites
- 6. Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- References







E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (10)







