Computational multiscale modeling of embryo development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.08.006Get rights and content

Recent advances in live imaging and genetics of mammalian development which integrate observations of biochemical activity, cell–cell signaling and mechanical interactions between cells pave the way for predictive mathematical multi-scale modeling. In early mammalian embryo development, two of the most critical events which lead to tissue patterning involve changes in gene expression as well as mechanical interactions between cells. We discuss the relevance of mathematical modeling of multi-cellular systems and in particular in simulating these patterns and describe some of the technical challenges one encounters. Many of these issues are not unique for the embryonic system but are shared by other multi-cellular modeling areas.

Introduction

The early mammalian embryo development is characterized by cell differentiation events leading to the formation of two extraembryonic lineages: trophectoderm (TE) and primitive endoderm (PE). Valuable insights into this process have been gained with single cell expression studies and live imaging techniques [1, 2, 3, 4, 5•, 6]. Most efforts have focused on determining the gene expression patterns that characterize the different lineages. Identified transcription factors for specific cell fates are, for example, Cdx2 and Gata6, accompanied by pluripotency genes: Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 (Figure 1). The dynamics of the genetic network involving these genes has been explored in several deterministic [7, 8] as well as stochastic models [9, 10]. Single cell experiments [11] could provide the impetus to understand what drives cell commitment, that is, permissive versus instructive cell fate decision [12, 13]. While genetic network approaches offer invaluable insight into tissue differentiation at the genetic level, embryogenesis involves also co-ordination of cell division, movement and cell differentiation leading to tissue formation [14••]. The high plasticity of single cell developmental fate and adaptivity to changing conditions within early embryo [6, 15•] suggests that robust formation of precisely localized specialized tissue precursors involves mechanisms going beyond single cells. Events like cell polarization during specification of the TE, directional cell migration and selective apoptosis during PE formation, require cell–cell signaling and interactions which convey relative positional information to cells [16••]. Hence, a complete understanding of early embryogenesis regulation must consider different scales of multicellular interactions, including intracellular and intercellular biochemical signaling. In addition to these effects, the importance of mechanical properties of cells in the processes of morphogenesis has been recognized [17]. Therefore, successful models of embryogenetic events should integrate genetic, biochemical and mechanical interactions at the cellular level. Recent research in the plant sciences has shown the success of the tight integration of theory and experiment in understanding how bio-chemistry and mechanics leads to the development of organs such as the shoot, roots and leaves [18]. Here we discuss computational multicellular, multiscale modeling techniques [19, 20] and their implementations in early developmental events of mammalian embryogenesis. In addition to the current state-of-the-art in modeling, we describe future challenges that must be met to successfully integrate multicellular models of different scales. We also suggest how these models could be useful in other areas such as models of tumor evolution in cancer and stem cell regeneration.

Section snippets

Models of embryo development

Despite the wealth of information gained from experiments [21, 22, 23, 24], our understanding of early mammalian embryogenesis is far from complete [25]. One reason is the complexity of biological systems in general where interactions between even a few components can lead to complicated and unpredictable behavior making it difficult to deduce interaction rules from observations of the entire system. Also, some important interactions might not yet be identified. In both cases computational

Challenges in genetic-mechanical multiscale modeling

There are several challenges in multi-scale modeling of multi-cellular systems, for example, bridging different spatio-temporal scales, handling of discrete events and interactions, effective use of computational resources.

For example, the time scales at which mechanical and biochemical interactions occur can be very different, as in Krupinski et al. [37]. To make the simulations efficient, numerical solvers should treat these processes with separate time steps appropriately. To take care of

Related areas of research

We have focused on the development of the early embryo. The interplay between mechanics and gene regulation is, however, a common feature of most developmental problems, such as limb formation [39]. Development of multiscale models is crucial for understanding of interactions also in such systems.

Some parallels can be drawn from modeling of stem cell niches in plant meristems. There the genetic networks are fairly well known [40] and their connection to spatial and mechanical aspects of

Future applications

The varied repertoire of final differentiated roles that stem cells play makes them crucial in studies of tissue regeneration. In their natural environment, stem cells are harbored in niches which provide the appropriate growth factors, cellular signals and mechanical cues. These maintain homeostasis as well as provide differentiation signals upon request by the organism. Elucidating these mechanisms could pave the way for artificial generation of differentiated cells, by mimicking the in vivo

Conclusion

The future is ripe for computational multi-scale modeling as available data have matured with regard to appropriate detail and resolution. Models provide hypothesis for further testing and could significantly advance our understanding both for fundamental biology and the more applied clinical setting of tissue regeneration. There are several technical advancements required at multiple scales to move these models forward.

There is now growing evidence from single cell experiments that

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

This work was supported (CP and PK) by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (Senior Individual Grant A3 06:215). VC would like to acknowledge support from Prof. Elliot Meyerowitz.

References (49)

  • S. Kobel et al.

    Biomaterials meet microfluidics: building the next generation of artificial niches

    Curr Opin Biotechnol

    (2011)
  • V. Diaz-Zuccarini et al.

    An in-silico future for the engineering of functional tissues and organs

    Organogenesis

    (2010)
  • K. Khairy et al.

    Reconstructing embryonic development

    Genesis

    (2010)
  • J. Artus et al.

    Troika of the mouseblastocyst: lineage segregation and stem cells

    Curr Stem Cell Res Ther

    (2012)
  • K. Cockburn et al.

    Making the blastocyst: lessons from the mouse

    J Clin Invest

    (2010)
  • Chickarmane et al.

    Transcriptional dynamics of the embryonic stem cell switch

    PLoS Comp Biol

    (2006)
  • V. Chickarmane et al.

    A computational model for understanding stem cell, trophectoderm and endoderm lineage determination

    PLoS ONE

    (2008)
  • T. Kalmar et al.

    Regulated Fluctuations in nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells

    PLoS Biol

    (2009)
  • I. Glauche et al.

    Nanog variability and pluripotency regulation of embryonic stem cells  insights from a mathematical model analysis

    PLoS ONE

    (2010)
  • J. Wray et al.

    The ground state of pluripotency

    Biochem Soc Trans

    (2010)
  • M.A. Cross et al.

    The lineage commitment of haematopoietic stem cells

    Curr Opin Genes Dev

    (1997)
  • R.O. Stephenson et al.

    Disorganized epithelial polarity and excess trophectoderm cell fate in preimplantation embryos lacking E-cadherin

    Development

    (2010)
  • J.B. Grabarek et al.

    Differential plasticity of epiblast and primitive endoderm precursors within the ICM of the early mouse embryo

    Development

    (2012)
  • S.M. Meilhac et al.

    Active cell movements coupled to positional induction are involved in lineage segregation in the mouse blastocyst

    Dev Biol

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text