Odorant and pheromone receptor gene regulation in vertebrates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2007.07.005Get rights and content

The largest mammalian gene family codes for odorant receptors and is exclusively devoted to the perception of the outside world. Its expression is very peculiar, since olfactory sensory neurons are only allowed to express a single of its numerous members, from a single parental allele. How this is achieved is unknown, but recent work points to multiple regulatory mechanisms, possibly shared by pheromone receptor genes, acting at (a) a general level, via the expression of the chemoreceptor itself and (b) a more restricted level, defined by activator elements.

Introduction

All life forms need tools to adequately respond to the known and unknown surroundings. These tools must bear a series of sensors whose diversity and complexity allows the high discrimination power the individual may necessitate. Multiple options, some of them remarkably creative, have been selected by evolution to achieve sensor variability. The mammalian immune system, for example, which encounters pathogens when the latter invade its territory, evolved a strategy breaking the dogma of genomic integrity, thus drastically increasing lymphocyte receptor diversity [1]. A very similar challenge is faced by olfactory sensory neurons: they constantly probe the outside world, part of which has never been experienced. Unlike immune cells, olfactory sensory neurons do not base their strategy on recombination to generate sensor diversity, but instead dispose a genomic repertoire of receptor genes of amazing size, from which they can choose from [2, 3].

The two major mammalian olfactory neuronal circuits, the main olfactory and vomeronasal systems, are functionally and physically separate. Their sensory neurons express seven transmembrane receptors to sense the world. Odorant receptors (ORs) are expressed by olfactory neurons from the main system, while vomeronasal neurons express pheromone receptors of the V1R or V2R type (which do not share sequence homologies with ORs or between each other). One hundred and ninety-one V1R [4] and 70 V2R [5] genes have been identified in the mouse, while the OR repertoire size is up by an order of magnitude [6].

Every olfactory sensory neuron expresses a single olfactory receptor gene, from a single allele, which results in hundreds of functionally different neuronal populations in the nasal cavity [2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. This view, involving thousands of narrowly tuned parallel lines, is at the base of our current understanding of olfactory coding at the peripheral level. How each sensory neuron is able to exclusively transcribe a single olfactory receptor gene is unknown. However, recent observations in the mouse suggest the existence of multiple levels of regulation, both at the gene, at the gene cluster, and at more global levels; these will be discussed here.

Section snippets

Choose me first…

The choice of an OR gene is apparently a stochastic process, which when stabilized, is likely to stay unchanged during the life of a sensory neuron. All OR genes are however not chosen at the same frequency, a situation which results in olfactory sensory subpopulations of variable sizes. Two not necessarily exclusive models of gene choice have been proposed: the first supports the existence of proximal and gene-specific activator elements, while the second involves regulatory sequences acting

…and don’t look elsewhere

Irreversibility of the OR choice was shown by using Cre recombinase-based genetic approaches, allowing the tracing of all neurons which transcribe a given OR gene during their lifetime, even transiently [33]. Some level of OR gene switching (up to 10%) is however also observed, a situation thought to reflect a short and early unstable time window during sensory neuron development [34]. A large number of reports support the monogenic and monoallelic transcription of OR genes in vertebrates [2, 8

Conclusion

Although the past few years have witnessed important steps in our understanding of olfactory gene regulation, among which the recognition of multiple regulatory levels, how sensory neurons achieve the transcription of a single chemosensory gene remains a mystery. We could be well inspired to look at non-neuronal cell types, in particular, again, lymphocytes, which are known to face similar challenges; analogies between these systems may not be limited to their needs, but parallels may well

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation.

References (43)

  • R. Hoppe et al.

    The clustered olfactory receptor gene family 262: genomic organization, promotor elements, and interacting transcription factors

    Genome Res

    (2003)
  • J.S. Michaloski et al.

    Identification of potential regulatory motifs in odorant receptor genes by analysis of promoter sequences

    Genome Res

    (2006)
  • G. Glusman et al.

    The complete human olfactory subgenome

    Genome Res

    (2001)
  • I.L. Martensson et al.

    The pre-B-cell receptor

    Curr Opin Immunol

    (2007)
  • P. Feinstein et al.

    Axon guidance of mouse olfactory sensory neurons by odorant receptors and the beta2 adrenergic receptor

    Cell

    (2004)
  • D. Jung et al.

    Mechanism and control of V(D)J recombination at the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus

    Annu Rev Immunol

    (2006)
  • P. Shi et al.

    Comparative genomic analysis identifies an evolutionary shift of vomeronasal receptor gene repertoires in the vertebrate transition from water to land

    Genome Res

    (2007)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Odorant and vomeronasal receptor genes in two mouse genome assemblies

    Genomics

    (2004)
  • B. Malnic et al.

    Combinatorial receptor codes for odors

    Cell

    (1999)
  • M. Pyrski et al.

    The OMP-lacZ transgene mimics the unusual expression pattern of OR-Z6, a new odorant receptor gene on mouse chromosome 6: implication for locus-dependent gene expression

    J Neurosci

    (2001)
  • S. Serizawa et al.

    Negative feedback regulation ensures the one receptor–one olfactory neuron rule in mouse

    Science

    (2003)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Coordinated coexpression of two vomeronasal receptor V2R genes per neuron in the mouse

      2011, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our ISH experiments with the two nine-probe mixes indicate that V2r1b-GFP and V2rf2-GFP neurons do not coexpress another family-ABD V2R gene. The ‘one receptor gene per neuron’ rule is commonly observed for ORs and V1Rs (Fuss and Ray, 2009; Imai and Sakano, 2009; Rodriguez, 2007), but is difficult to prove beyond doubt (Mombaerts, 2004). In sharp contrast, 25% of ∆V2rf2-lacZ neurons in 3-wk old mice coexpress mRNA for another family-ABD V2R gene.

    • Proteomic Analysis of the Human Olfactory Bulb

      2017, OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology
    • Developmental regulation of sensory receptor gene expression

      2009, Developmental Gene Expression Regulation
    • Pheromone sensing in mice

      2009, Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation
    • Temporal coding in olfaction

      2009, The Neurobiology of Olfaction
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text