Elsevier

Fuel

Volume 107, May 2013, Pages 866-872
Fuel

Performance tests of a diesel engine fueled with pentanol/diesel fuel blends

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.01.066Get rights and content

Abstract

The use of straight (in modified engines) or blended alcohols with fossil fuel provides an attractive alternative fuel for internal combustion engines. Moreover, alcohol can be produced by biorefineries, thus reducing the use of fossil resources. However, main achievements in this field correspond to the use of short-chain alcohols, like ethanol, while there is little experience with higher alcohols. In this work, the performance of a direct-injection diesel engine, without any modifications, fueled with 1-pentanol/diesel fuel blends has been evaluated. Blends with 10% pentanol/90% diesel fuel, 15% pentanol/85% diesel fuel, 20% pentanol/80% diesel fuel and 25% pentanol/75% diesel fuel (v/v) were tested and engine performance results were compared with those provided by neat diesel fuel. Experimental results showed insignificant engine power, brake thermal efficiency and brake-specific fuel consumption variations when the engine was fueled with the majority of the blends instead of straight diesel fuel. Moreover, statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the blends and diesel fuel (EN 590) tests. During engine starting, no difficulties were experienced and the engine performed satisfactorily on the blends throughout the entire test. On the basis of this study, pentanol/diesel fuel blends can be considered acceptable diesel fuel alternatives if exhaust emissions and long-term engine tests show acceptable results.

Highlights

• We have fueled a diesel engine with pentanol/diesel fuel blends. • Performance results are similar for both pentanol blends and straight diesel fuel. • Performance results are better for pentanol blends than ethanol blends. • Pentanol LHV, ST, VLH, ρ and CN values are closer to diesel fuel than lower alcohols. • The presence of oxygen offsets pentanol reduced LHV and provides better combustion.

Introduction

Nowadays countries are researching alternatives to fossil fuels, mainly due to the increase and fluctuation in prices of diesel fuel and petrol, a growing environmental conscience and the shortage of petroleum. In fact, “Directive 2009/28/ CE of the European Parliament and the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources” specifies that each EU Member State shall ensure that, in 2020, the share of energy from renewable sources in all forms of transport is at least 10% of the final consumption of energy in transport in the Member States.

There is a growing interest on using alcohols as an option to substitute petrol in spark ignition engines and extensive research has been carried out [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. The use of oxygenated fuels involve oxygen enrichment, enhancement of premixed combustion phase of blends and improvement of the diffusive combustion phase [9], [10], [11]. However, some difficulties prevent their use as fuel for diesel engines, among them are: (a) the lower heating value (LHV) of alcohols are below that of diesel fuel, thus to provide the same engine power, more alcohol by mass and volume than diesel fuel is needed [12]; (b) high percentage of alcohol presents miscibility and stability problems when blended with diesel fuel [13] and phases separate on the presence of water traces [14]; (c) alcohols have low cetane numbers, but diesel engines need high cetane number to facilitate autoignition and provide little ignition delay [15]; (d) the poor autoignition capacity of alcohols is responsible of severe knock due to the rapid burning of vaporized alcohol [14]; (e) alcohols depict inappropriate lubricating properties compared to diesel fuel [12], [14] and may even dilute the lubricant film on the piston wall, thus affecting engine durability.

To solve the aforementioned disadvantages, different technologies comprising modified and unmodified engines running on alcohol blends have been proposed. Pulverization of alcohol, double injection of diesel fuel and alcohol, direct alcohol/diesel fuel blends and emulsions are among the most used alternatives [16]. Direct use of alcohol/diesel fuel blends is one of the most interesting possibilities because of their lower cost and, most important, modifications on diesel engine are not necessary using low alcohol concentrations. Due of these reasons, finding both the most appropriate type of alcohol and the optimum alcohol/diesel fuel blend to substitute diesel fuel on diesel engines is needed.

Ethanol and methanol are the most researched alcohols to be used as alternate fuels, although as methanol has very limited solubility in diesel fuel [13], the most common alternative is ethanol. Can et al. [17] found reductions on engine power of 20% and 12.5%, when diesel fuel was blended with 15% and 10% ethanol, respectively. Ajav et al. [18] found a power reduction of 5% and a brake-specific fuel consumption increase above 20% for 20% ethanol blended with diesel fuel. Hansen et al. [19] found a 7–10% decrease in an engine power at rated speed with 15% dry ethanol, 2.35% Pure Energy Corporation (PEC) additive and 82.65% diesel fuel blend. Li et al. [20] studied ethanol/diesel fuel blends, from 5% to 20% of ethanol, to find out that brake-specific fuel consumption increased using all tested blends. Lu et al. [10] tested an ethanol addition (from 10% to 20%) to diesel fuel on a diesel engine. Results showed that brake-specific fuel consumption increased at overall engine operating conditions. Bilgin et al. [21] found that the addition of 4% ethanol to diesel fuel increased brake power by 1.5%, while brake-specific fuel consumption decreased by 2.5%. Kass et al. [22] tested two diesel fuel blends containing 10% and 15% dry ethanol and 2% GE Betz additive, respectively and reported around 8% torque reduction for both fuel blends. Therefore, usually using ethanol/diesel fuel blends, percentages of alcohol higher than 10% means power reduction while brake-specific fuel consumption increases.

Large values of both lower heating value (LHV) and cetane number (CN) are desirable fuel characteristics on diesel engines, while self-ignition temperature (ST) and vaporization latent heat (VLH) should exhibit moderate values. The value of fuel properties, including LHV, CN, ST, VLH are established by the different molecular structure of alcohols. Normal paraffins (straight chains) have higher LHV but lower VLH and ST when the number of carbon increases. Moreover, normal paraffins have higher self-ignition tendency (lower ST) than isoparaffins (branched chains), n-oleofins, cycloalkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons considering the same number of carbons [23].

In regard to cetane number, normal paraffins exhibit a higher value than isoparaffins, monocycloparaffins, alkylbenzenes, polycycloparaffins and polyaromatics, even showing the same number of carbons [24]. Moreover, considering normal paraffins, the higher the molecular weigh the higher the CN value [24]. CN decreases with the decrease of the chain length [25], [26] or the branches increase [25]. Also, the longer the chain of carbon the smaller the knock [27]. Moreover, in structures with isomers, when the number of branches increases, knock tendency increases [27]. In regard to density, it increases with the number of carbons [24], being smaller for paraffins, followed by cycloparaffins and finally, aromatics [24].

Therefore, it may be inferred that the increase of the chain length and the absence of branches in an alcohol show some advantages like higher LHV, density and CN, lower ST, VLH and knock tendency, although the percentage of oxygen decreases.

The use of higher-alcohols blended with diesel fuel may provide additional advantages compared to short-chain alcohols (up to a limit), i.e. longer molecular unbranched structure of alcohols that means higher LHV and CN, lower ST and knock reduction, etc. However, very little work has been reported on higher-alcohols being used as alternative fuel or fuel additives. To the best of our knowledge, references of the use of pentanol as fuel are almost inexistent. In fact, Gautam and Martin II [3] studied the effects of 10% of different alcohols blended with petrol on spark ignition engines. The maximum amount of pentanol used was less than 3%, while power, torque and specific fuel consumption were not evaluated.

Moreover, the concept of a biorefinery for higher-alcohol production is to integrate ethanol formation via fermentation with conversion of this simple alcohol intermediate into higher alcohols [28], i.e. pentanol. Biorefineries use renewable raw materials to produce energy together with a wide range of commodities, decreasing the dependency on fossil fuels reserves. Thus, pentanol may be produced through this promising route for sustained growth and preserving the environment.

The purpose of this study is to test and analyze the influence of 1-pentanol/diesel fuel blends on diesel engine performance. This target includes testing a diesel engine fueled with different 1-pentanol/diesel fuel blends and analyzing brake engine power, torque, fuel consumption, brake-specific fuel consumption, brake thermal efficiency and to find out the optimum alcohol/fuel blend to run on direct-injection diesel engines.

Section snippets

Fuel blends

1-Pentanol PRS was purchased from Panreac S.A.U. (Barcelona, Spain). Some properties of diesel fuel, methanol, ethanol and pentanol are given in Table 1. The tested fuels were straight diesel fuel (D100), 10% pentanol/90% diesel fuel blend (v/v) (P10), 15% pentanol/85% diesel fuel blend (v/v) (P15), 20% pentanol/80% diesel fuel blend (v/v) (P20) and 25% pentanol/75% diesel fuel blend (v/v) (P25). Some blends properties are shown in Table 2. Kinematic viscosity (ν) was measured with a

Tested fuels

According to Table 1, it may be seen that 1-pentanol, also named pentanol along this study, has lower VLH value than diesel fuel. As this is an important parameter on the combustion, no alcohols with higher number of carbons (the higher the number of carbons, the lower the VLH value) have been considered. Compared to other alcohols, it can be seen that pentanol seems to be the most attractive alternative because it provides properties values similar to those of diesel fuel and, hence, a better

Conclusions

A direct-injection compression ignition Perkins diesel engine was fueled with pentanol/diesel fuel blends (in a range between 10% and 25% of pentanol) and engine performance tests were compared with the use of neat diesel fuel. From this field trial, the following conclusions can be drawn out:

  • The existence of oxygen in the molecular structure of 1-pentanol offsets its reduced LHV, showing better combustion and BTE than diesel fuel (straight or blended with short-chain alcohols) but similar

Acknowledgements

Authors gratefully acknowledge support for this research to IFAPA (Córdoba, Spain) for the laboratory facilities and to both the Andalusian Economy, Innovation and Enterprise Council (TEP-4994) and the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (ENE2010-15159), for funding this research.

References (39)

  • M. Abu-Qudais et al.

    The effect of alcohol fumigation on diesel engine performance and emissions

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2000)
  • X. Li et al.

    Combustion and emission characteristics of a two-stroke diesel engine operating on alcohol

    Renew Energy

    (2005)
  • F.N. Alasfour

    Butanol – a single cylinder engine study: engine performance

    Int J Energy Res

    (1997)
  • M. Gautam et al.

    Combustion characteristics of higher-alcohol/gasoline blends

    Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A – J Power Energy

    (2000)
  • M. Gautam et al.

    Emissions characteristics of higher alcohol/gasoline blends

    Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A – J Power Energy

    (2000)
  • R.W. Rice et al.

    Exhaust-gas emissions of butanol, ethanol, and methanol-gasoline blends

    J Eng Gas Turbines and Power-Trans ASME

    (1991)
  • H. Serdar et al.

    Comparative study of mathematical and experimental analysis of spark ignition engine performance used ethanol–gasoline blend fuel

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2006)
  • Wallner T, Miers SA. Combustion behavior of gasoline and gasoline/ethanol blends in a modern direct-injection...
  • T. Wallner et al.

    A comparison of ethanol and butanol as oxygenates using a direct-injection, spark-ignition engine

    J Eng Gas Turbines and Power-Trans ASME

    (2009)
  • Cited by (186)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text