An experimental study on turbulent lifted flames of methane in coflow jets at elevated temperatures
Introduction
The liftoff height of a turbulent lifted flame increases linearly as the jet velocity increases. This is typical behavior for the stabilization of such a flame. The turbulent lifted flame is distinguished from a laminar lifted flame, for which the liftoff height increases nonlinearly with jet velocity [1], [2]. In particular, there are several competing theories on the mechanism of flame stabilization in a turbulent nonpremixed jet [1], [2]. Among these, the premixed flame model [3], [4] and the large-scale mixing model [5], [6], [7] are valid for predicting turbulent flame stabilization and blowout.
Vanquickenborne and van Tiggelen proposed a premixed flame model in which the liftoff height was based on the balance between the mean turbulent propagation speed and the mean flow velocity when the base of a turbulent lifted flame had a premixed fuel and air mixture [3]. In addition, Kalghatgi investigated the characteristics of various fuels such as hydrogen, methane, propane, and ethylene, based on the hypothesis that a turbulent lifted flame is stabilized at the location of the mean flow velocity and local propagation speed of the flame [4].
Broadwell et al. and Dahm and Dibble predicted the blowout velocity from the ratio of mixing time to chemical reaction time occurring because of the mixing of reentrained burned gas into unburned reactants. However, their model did not successfully predict linear liftoff height of a turbulent flame [5], [6]. Therefore, Miake-Lye and Hammer could successfully predict the liftoff height of a turbulent flame based on the jet velocity, using a large-scale mixing model that adopts large-scale dynamics and supports the existence of a flame until the strain reaches a critical one imposed on the stoichiometric contour line of the fuel and air mixture [7].
Recently, the current authors and their colleagues conducted several experimental studies on the stabilization of a laminar lifted flame containing various hydrocarbon fuels in nonpremixed coflow jets, by varying the initial temperature [8], [9], [10], [11]. When the initial temperature was relatively low, the stabilization mechanisms for lifted flames were influenced by the propagation speed of the lifted flame edge [8], [9], [10], which frequently had a tribrachial structure. Especially in laminar jets, the Schmidt number of the fuel, Sc, influenced the existence of lifted flames.
When the initial temperature was increased above a certain autoignition temperature, the autoignited lifted flames of CH4, C2H4, C2H6, C3H8, n-C4H10, and a mixture of CH4/H2 were stabilized regardless of Sc, and the ignition delay time played an important role in the stabilization [9], [10], [11]. According to the experimental study results for fuel jets with the mixture of CH4/H2 in coflow air with an elevated temperature, differential diffusion among fuels could play an important role in autoignition in a nonpremixed jet [11].
For the turbulent lifted flames, the experiment in heated coflow jets was mainly focused on the reduction of NOx emission and the flame stability [12], [13], [14]. Systematic studies on the stabilization mechanism of turbulent lifted flames are rather limited, however, especially at elevated temperatures. In one such study, the authors conducted experimental investigations of turbulent lifted flames of propane in nonpremixed coflow jets with initial temperature variation [15]. The behavior of the turbulent lifted flames was analyzed using the premixed flame and large-scale mixing models. In addition, the prediction of the liftoff height and blowout velocity for such flames was improved by considering the physical properties for the initial temperature variation [15].
The purpose of the present study is to extend the generality of the previous experiment to methane fuel based on the theory of a turbulent jet. The study will focus on methane because it is widely used in various combustion facilities as a clean fuel. In addition, the study will report on the characteristics of a turbulent lifted flame of methane fuel diluted by nitrogen for nonpremixed coflow jets with initial temperature variation.
Section snippets
Experiment
The experimental apparatus consisted of a coflow burner, flow controllers, and a heating system, as shown in Fig. 1. The coflow burner had a central fuel nozzle made of stainless steel with an inner diameter d of 3.76 mm. The nozzle length was 750 mm for the flow to be fully developed. Air was supplied through a metal fiber, ceramic beads, and a ceramic honeycomb, to produce a uniform coflow. The inner diameter of the honeycomb was 133 mm. A Pyrex tube with the same inner diameter was installed
Results and discussion
The experiment for turbulent lifted flames of methane in the coflow jets was conducted by varying the initial temperature T0, in the range from 300 to 900 K and the fuel mole fraction XF,0. The liftoff height HL was defined as the minimum height for a fluctuating turbulent flame base and was measured with the jet velocity U0. The characteristics of liftoff height and blowout velocity are reported in the following sections.
Concluding remarks
The stabilization characteristics of a turbulent flame in methane coflow jets have been investigated experimentally by varying the initial temperature. The lifted flames showed typical behavior, in which the liftoff height decreased with the jet velocity in the transition regime and increased linearly with the jet velocity in the turbulent regime. It has been confirmed that the critical velocities at liftoff, blowout, blowoff, and reattachment were strongly affected by the stoichiometric
References (26)
Lifted flames on fuel jets in co-flowing air
Prog Energy Combust Sci
(2009)Toward an understanding of the stabilization mechanisms of lifted turbulent jet flames: experiments
Prog Energy Combust Sci
(2007)- et al.
The stabilization mechanism of lifted diffusion flames
Combust Flame
(1966) - et al.
Blowout of turbulent diffusion flames
Proc Combust Inst
(1985) - et al.
Coflowing turbulent jet diffusion flame blowout
Proc Combust Inst
(1989) - et al.
Lifted turbulent jet flames: a stability criterion based on the jet large-scale structure
Proc Combust Inst
(1989) - et al.
Characteristics of laminar lifted flames in coflow jets with initial temperature variation
Proc Combust Inst
(2007) - et al.
Autoignited laminar lifted flames of propane in coflow jets with tribrachial edge and mild combustion
Combust Flame
(2009) - et al.
Autoignited laminar lifted flames of methane, ethylene, ethane, and n-butane jets in coflow air with elevated temperature
Combust Flame
(2010) - et al.
Autoignited laminar lifted flames of methane/hydrogen mixtures in heated coflow air
Combust Flame
(2012)
Radiative heat loss and NOx emission of turbulent jet flames in preheated air up to 1230 K
Proc Combust Inst
Effect of liftoff on NOx emission of turbulent jet flame in high-temperature coflowing air
Proc Combust Inst
Characteristics of turbulent lifted flames in coflow jets with initial temperature variation
Proc Combust Inst
Cited by (24)
An experimental study and analysis of lift-off length in inclined nonpremixed turbulent jet flames
2023, Combustion and FlameEffect of cross airflow on the flame geometrical characteristics and flame radiation fraction of ethylene jet fires with carbon dioxide addition
2022, Applications in Energy and Combustion ScienceLift-off characteristics of non-premixed jet flames in laminar/turbulent transition
2022, Combustion and FlameLiftoff height of turbulent diffusion flame in water-mist-laden coflowing air stream
2021, Combustion and Flame