The discursive structure of FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade): The negotiation and interpretation of legality in the EU and Indonesia☆
Highlights
► FLEGT is seen as a field in which different discourses emerge, compete and connect. ► The results show a shift from participation and sustainability towards regulation. ► FLEGT privileges regulatory instruments over market and civil society governance. ► By turning law enforcement into an end, FLEGT risks neglecting sustainability issues. ► Open debate about FLEGT’s goals and the appropriate role of law enforcement is needed.
Section snippets
Introduction: discourses and trends in forest governance
The past decades show two major changes in global forest governance. The first is an increasing concern with combating deforestation and achieving conservation and sustainability. The second implies “a move away from centrally administered, top-down regulatory policies that characterized much of the 19th and 20th centuries” towards increasing decentralization, marketization, and participation (Agrawal et al., 2008 pg. 1460). This increased involvement of lower level authorities and non-state
The FLEGT Action Plan and the Indonesian timber legality standards
In 2003, the European Commission published an action plan to combat illegal logging and trade in illegal timber (EC, 2007a). The FLEGT Action Plan is considered to be Europe's response to the growing problem of illegal logging and trade in illegal timber and forest products. The main objective of the FLEGT Action Plan is to ensure that only timber from legal sources enters the European Union. This is achieved by developing Voluntary Partnership Agreements, public procurement policies, promoting
Approach and methods
This article uses a policy discourse analytical approach (Hajer, 1995). As this approach is well suited to address complex policy issues which involve multiple dimensions, meanings and interpretations it fits with the objective of the article to analyze how legality is interpreted, defined and negotiated in the EU-Indonesia VPA. Using this approach, forest governance, in this case FLEGT, is conceived as a discursive field in which different discourses emerge, compete and form connections and
Discourses in the EU context
The EU Briefing Notes clearly demonstrate the different interpretations of FLEGT within the EU. Although in the oldest briefing notes, dating back to 2004 and 2005, (EC, 2004a, EC, 2004b, EC, 2005) state oriented discourses were most prominent, the series published in 2007 (EC, 2007a, EC, 2007c, EC, 2007d, EC, 2007b) reflect the increasing importance of sustainability and participation oriented discourses. Market discourses do not feature in the Briefing Notes, which is in sharp contrast with
Discourses in the Indonesian context
The Indonesian legality standards are published in a rather detailed and technical document (the SLVK document) which includes many different aspects of forest management and timber trade. The standards consist of a number of principles, the most prominent of which are (1) legal status and user rights, (2) compliance with the legal system and procedures for harvesting and (3) compliance with environmental and social aspects related to harvesting (P38, 2009). Apart from these issues, the state
The discursive structure of FLEGT
Our findings show that the FLEGT process reflects a complex cluster of discourses that complement and compete with each other. The analyses of the interviews and the EU documents confirm the earlier claim that FLEGT and legality are interpreted and defined in different ways (also see Wiersum and Elands, 2012). The main point of contention in these discursive struggles is whether FLEGT is purely a way to regulate trade or whether it also should include issues of environmental and social
FLEGT, governance, and the state
In its focus on regulatory instruments and the state, FLEGT offers a contrast with other, voluntary, forest governance initiatives such as the principles for sustainable forest management or certification. In the context of Indonesia, the discursive structure of FLEGT is not surprising. As Peters and Pierre (1998) argue, processes of reform are path dependent and reflect the social and political history and culture of a country. They are embedded in systems of norms and administrative practices
References (54)
- et al.
Analysing governance modes and shifts, governance arrangements in Dutch nature policy
Forest Policy and Economics
(2012) - et al.
Interpretation and implementation of ecosystem management in international and national forest policy
Forest Policy and Economics
(2007) - et al.
Partnerships in forest governance
Global Environmental Change
(2007) - et al.
Changing governance of the world's forests
Science
(2008) - et al.
Forests, discourses, institutions, a discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance
Forest Policy and Economics
(2009) - et al.
The disoriented state
- et al.
Discourses, actors and instruments in international forest governance
- et al.
The voluntary partnership agreement: the Ghanaian and Malaysian experience
International Forestry Review
(2009) - et al.
Planting trees to mitigate climate change: contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism
Global Environmental Politics
(2006) - et al.
The EU-Ghana VPA, a comprehensive policy analysis
International Forestry Review
(2010)
Legal Timber, Verification and Governance in the Forest Sector
From new order to regional autonomy: shifting dynamics of illegal logging in Kalimantan, Indonesia
Hostage to norms: states, institutions and global forest politics
Global Environmental Politics
The Politics of the Earth, Environmental Discourses
Dynamics of illegal logging in Indonesia
FLEGT Briefing Notes Series 2004 (01) What is FLEGT?
FLEGT Briefing Notes Series 2004 (02) What does FLEGT mean for Member States?
FLEGT Briefing Notes Series 2005 (09) A timber legality assurance system
FLEGT Briefing Notes Series 2007 (01). What is FLEGT?
FLEGT Briefing Notes Series 2007 (02) What is legal timber?
FLEGT Briefing Notes Series 2007 (03). A timber Legality Assurance System
FLEGT briefing notes series 2007 (06)
Voluntary Partnership Agreements
EFI Policy Brief 3. What is a Voluntary Partnership Agreement?—The European Union Approach
Theoretical strategies of poststructuralist policy analysis: towards an analytics of government
The Politics of Environmental Discourse, Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process
Doing discourse analysis: coalitions, practices, meaning
Cited by (43)
Centralized governance for food safety of non-timber forest products: Wild-simulated ginseng in the Republic of Korea
2023, Forest Policy and EconomicsEffects of EU illegal logging policy on timber-supplying countries: A systematic review
2023, Journal of Environmental ManagementPerceptions of wood-processing industries on FLEGT implementation: Insights from Vietnam
2021, Forest Policy and EconomicsTracing timber legality in practice: The case of Ghana and the EU
2021, Forest Policy and EconomicsProfiting from illegality: A discursive analysis of the chainsaw operation in rural Ghana
2020, Forest Policy and EconomicsCitation Excerpt :To this effect, there have been some national, bilateral and international agreements to address CSM operations. Notable among such initiatives is the Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Action Plan, one of the recent attempts to combat deforestation and promote sustainable forest development (Van Heeswijk and Turnhout, 2013; Wiersum and Elands, 2013). The FLEGT Action Plan is seen as Europe's response to the growing problem of illegal logging and trade in illegal timber and forest products.
- ☆
This article belongs to the Special Issue: Emerging Forest Regimes.