Elsevier

Food Control

Volume 121, March 2021, 107642
Food Control

Identification and selection of animal health and food safety-related risk factors to be included in the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's risk assessment model for livestock feed mills

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107642Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A risk assessment model for commercial and on-farm feed mills is being developed.

  • This model covers both animal health and food safety risks related to feed mills.

  • 34 risk factors were generated based on scientific literature and expert advice.

  • Assessment criteria were defined based on practices found in the feed industry.

  • Results will support the allocation of inspection resources based on risk.

Abstract

The safety of livestock feed is recognized worldwide as a prerequisite for the protection of animal and human health. In this context, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency is developing an Establishment-based Risk Assessment model for livestock feed mills (ERA-Feed Mill) to assist in the allocation of inspection resources based on feed safety risk. The objectives of the present study were to identify and select animal health and food safety-related risk factors along with their assessment criteria, pertaining to Canadian feed mill practices, to be included in the ERA-Feed Mill model. To do so, a review of the scientific literature and consultations with feed experts were conducted. A final list of 34 risk factors was generated, 21 identified from the scientific literature and 13 from feed expert advice. Risk factors were grouped into three clusters: inherent risk factors, mitigation factors and compliance factors for which 4, 10 and 20 factors were identified, respectively. Criteria for quantitatively assessing each risk factor were defined based on common practices found in the Canadian feed industry. These findings contributed to the initial steps of the CFIA's ERA-Feed Mill model development. By assessing the feed safety risk factors related to feed mills in Canada, this tool will help inform the CFIA on the level of oversight required to manage these risks, and will contribute to the production and maintenance of healthy livestock and the production of safe food.

Introduction

Livestock feed plays a crucial role in the global agricultural and agri-food industries, ensuring the constant supply of safe products of animal origin for human consumption, the health and welfare of livestock and the economic sustainability of animal production (FAO and IFIF, 2010). Over the last two decades, the feed sector has become increasingly important, as the worldwide socio-economic changes has led to an intensification of livestock production systems (Crump, Griffin, & Angulo, 2002). In 2016, the feed industry generated an estimated global annual turnover of over US $400 billion (IFIF, 2017). In Canada, the total livestock feed production surpasses 26 million tonnes annually and the Canadian commercial feed industry generates a total revenue of over $4 billion per year (ANAC, 2019). Livestock feed represents the starting point of the food safety supply chain in the farm-to-table continuum (Crump et al., 2002). Livestock feed can be contaminated with biological, chemical, and physical hazards from inherent toxicants or those introduced during harvesting of the raw ingredients, manufacturing and processing, storage or transport (Fink-Gremmels, 2012; Maciorowski, Herrera, Kundinger, & Ricke, 2006). Indeed, concerns with feed safety were raised globally after the identification of hazardous substances [e.g. dioxins, aflatoxin M1 (AFM1)] in food of animal origin derived from livestock that consumed contaminated feed (Campagnollo et al., 2016; Fink-Gremmels, 2012). It is important to mention that the food safety risks to humans associated with feed has also gained importance, particularly, after the first identification in 1986 of a group of neurodegenerative infective agents (prions) responsible for transmissible animal spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) such as the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle (Bhunia, 2018).

In Canada, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) administers the Feeds Act and the Health of Animals Act, and their associated regulations, which govern the manufacture, sale and importation of livestock feeds. The CFIA verifies that livestock feeds are safe for animals, humans, and the environment, that they are effective for their intended purpose, and are labelled appropriately (Government of Canada, 1985). As part of its commitment to continuous improvement, the CFIA is developing a systematic evidence-based approach to improve its management of risk along the food supply chain. In this context, the CFIA has developed two quantitative risk assessment models named the Establishment-based Risk Assessment model for food establishments (ERA-Food) (Racicot et al., 2018, 2019; Zanabria et al., 2018, 2019), and for hatcheries (ERA-H) (Racicot et al., 2020a, 2020b). Following the same principles of other risk assessment models, the CFIA is currently developing an Establishment-based Risk Assessment model for livestock feed mills (ERA-Feed Mill) to assess both animal health and the food safety risks (i.e.: referred to as feed safety risks for the remainder of the manuscript) associated with feed mills to support a risk-based decision making in the feed sector encompassing terrestrial and aquatic livestock species. According to the Canadian Feeds Act, an establishment refers to any place, including a conveyance, where a feed is manufactured, stored, packaged or labelled. Feed establishments consist of commercial feed mills, mixed feed manufacturers, single ingredient feed manufacturers, on-farm feed mills, rendering plants, retail outlets, and third-party conveyances. The ERA-Feed Mill model is a tool intended to guide and support the CFIA's risk management strategy, that includes but is not limited to the allocation of CFIA inspection resources based on risks for commercial feed mills and on-farm feed mills. In fact, the management question related to the development of this model was: How to identify Feed Mills that are most at risk to generate issues related to animal health and food safety. The initial step in the ERA-Feed Mill model's development process is to identify the risk factors to be included in the algorithm. Therefore, the present study aimed at 1) identifying and selecting feed safety-related risk factors to be included in the ERA-Feed Mill model, and 2) defining the assessment criteria to evaluate each risk factor based on common practices found in the Canadian feed industry.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The ERA-Feed Mill model development began in July 2018 by forming a technical working group (TWG), consisting of 14 members from CFIA (nine veterinarians, one statistician, one food safety specialist, two feed program specialists and one toxicologist) as well as four researchers from the Université de Montréal. The TWG defined the core research questions to guide the project progress and conducted the initial work related to each step of the model development process. In addition, a Scientific

Results

Initially, a total of 913 non-duplicated papers were found using the terms listed in Table 1. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria described previously (Steps 2 and 3), 118 records remained eligible for consideration (Fig. 1). Based on the information and data available from these records, a list of 21 risk factors, along with their assessment criteria, was identified: two inherent risk factors, eight mitigation factors and 11 compliance factors (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4). This

Discussion

The aim of the current study was to identify relevant risk factors and assessment criteria to be included in the risk assessment model for commercial feed mills and on-farm feed mills (Government of Canada, 2020). The output of this model will be used as an important factor in the allocation of CFIA inspection resources based on feed safety risks. The innovative aspect of the ERA-Feed Mill model is that it covers both animal health and food safety risks, which represents a unique approach to

Conclusion

Results of the current study identified 34 risk factors for inclusion in the CFIA's ERA-Feed Mill model for assessing the feed safety risks associated with commercial and on-farm feed mills in Canada. It is also the authors' intent to provide regulatory agencies and feed standard stakeholders from other jurisdictions with a state-of-the-art set of factors to consider in feed safety assessment. As a next step, selected assessment criteria will be quantified as to their relative individual or

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Mohamed Rhouma: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Virginie Lachapelle: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Geneviève Comeau: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Sylvain Quessy: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Romina Zanabria: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. France Provost:

Declaration of competing interest

All authors declare that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest associated with this research.

Acknowledgement

This research was made possible through the help and support from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. The authors would like to thank CFIA colleagues, Jennifer Kormos, Eric T. Ward-Bellehumeur, and Shawn MacEachern, for their contribution in the revision of the list of risk factors and criteria prior to submission.

References (120)

  • J. De Jong et al.

    Analytical strategies for the early quality and safety assurance in the global feed chain Approaches for nitrogen adulterants in soybean meal and mineral and transformer oils in vegetable oils

    Trends in Analytical Chemistry

    (2016)
  • J.A. Fernandez Pierna et al.

    NIR fingerprint screening for early control of non-conformity at feed mills

    Food Chemistry

    (2015)
  • R. Fernandez-Gonzalez et al.

    Inputs of polychlorinated biphenyl residues in animal feeds

    Food Chemistry

    (2013)
  • J. Fink-Gremmels

    Introduction to animal feed contamination

  • D. Frezza et al.

    Standard and Light-Cycler PCR methods for animal DNA species detection in animal feedstuffs

    Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

    (2008)
  • A. Ghosh et al.

    Fresh steam-flaked corn in cattle feedlots is an important site for fecal coliform contamination by house flies

    Journal of Food Protection

    (2015)
  • P. Häggblom

    How does Sweden control Salmonella before it enters the food chain?

  • A.R. Huss et al.

    Evaluation of a biological pathogen decontamination protocol for animal feed mills

    Journal of Food Protection

    (2015)
  • F.T. Jones et al.

    Salmonella in commercially manufactured feeds

    Poultry Science

    (2004)
  • M. Kim et al.

    Formation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/dibenzofurans (PCDD/fs) from a refinery process for zinc oxide used in feed additives: A source of dioxin contamination in Chilean pork

    Chemosphere

    (2011)
  • P. Krcmar et al.

    Identification of bovine-specific DNA in feedstuffs

    Journal of Food Protection

    (2001)
  • M.S. Myint et al.

    A cross-sectional study of bacterial contamination in plant-protein feed from feed stores in Northern Virginia and Maryland

    Animal Feed Science and Technology

    (2007)
  • D.D.C.P. Pellegrini et al.

    Distribution of Salmonella clonal groups in four Brazilian feed mills

    Food Control

    (2015)
  • M. Racicot et al.

    Quantifying the impact of food safety criteria included in the Canadian Food Inspection Agency risk assessment model for food establishments through expert elicitation

    Food Control

    (2018)
  • M. Racicot et al.

    Identification of risk factors to be considered for food establishments' risk assessment models

    Microbial Risk Analysis

    (2019)
  • C. Riccioli et al.

    Identifying animal species in NIR hyperspectral images of processed animal proteins (PAPs): Comparison of multivariate techniques

    Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

    (2018)
  • R. Roesli et al.

    Trap catches of stored-product insects before and after heat treatment in a pilot feed mill

    Journal of Stored Products Research

    (2003)
  • A.A. Semeao et al.

    Spatio-temporal distribution of stored-product insects around food processing and storage facilities

    Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

    (2013)
  • G. Shen et al.

    A feasibility study of non-targeted adulterant screening based on NIRM spectral library of soybean meal to guarantee quality: The example of non-protein nitrogen

    Food Chemistry

    (2016)
  • J.W. Spears et al.

    Chromium concentrations in ruminant feed ingredients

    Journal of Dairy Science

    (2017)
  • I. Almeida et al.

    Co-occurrence of mycotoxins in swine feed produced in Portugal

    Mycotoxin Research

    (2011)
  • H. Argüello et al.

    Surveillance data highlights feed form, biosecurity, and disease control as significant factors associated with Salmonella infection on farrow-to-finish pig farms

    Frontiers in Microbiology

    (2018)
  • V. Baeten et al.

    Detection of banned meat and bone meal in feedstuffs by near-infrared microscopic analysis of the dense sediment fraction

    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

    (2005)
  • V. Baliukoniene et al.

    Regularities of fungi and mycotoxins accumulation in feeding grain

  • A.C. Bautista et al.

    Diagnostic value of tissue monensin concentrations in horses following toxicosis

    Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

    (2014)
  • E.D. Baxter

    Safety and quality assurance for cereals for animal feed

  • S. Bellorini et al.

    Discriminating animal fats and their origins: Assessing the potentials of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, gas chromatography, immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction techniques

    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

    (2005)
  • A.K. Bhunia

    Foodborne microbial pathogens: Mechanisms and pathogenesis

    (2018)
  • A. Boix et al.

    Validation of a near infrared microscopy method for the detection of animal products in feedingstuffs: Results of a collaborative study

    Food Additives & Contaminants Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess

    (2012)
  • K. Bottoms et al.

    Investigation of biosecurity risks associated with the feed delivery: A pilot study

    Canadian Veterinary Journal-Revue Veterinaire Canadienne

    (2015)
  • A.S. Bowman et al.

    Investigating the introduction of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus into an Ohio swine operation

    BMC Veterinary Research

    (2015)
  • L.C. Browning et al.

    The concentration of strontium and other minerals in animal feed ingredients

    Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition

    (2013)
  • J.C. Carlson et al.

    Efficacy of European starling control to reduce Salmonella enterica contamination in a concentrated animal feeding operation in the Texas panhandle

    BMC Veterinary Research

    (2011)
  • J.A. Carpenter et al.

    Tiamulin and narasin toxicosis in nursery pigs

    Journal of Swine Health and Production

    (2005)
  • L.H. Channaiah et al.

    Stored-product insects carry antibiotic-resistant and potentially virulent enterococci

    FEMS Microbiology Ecology

    (2010)
  • C. Civitareale et al.

    Multi-drug UPLC-MS/MS method to quantify antimicrobials in feedingstuffs at carry-over level

    Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

    (2018)
  • R.P. Coelho et al.

    Safety programs for the feed industry: Characterization and perceived benefits of the implementation

    Gestão & Produção

    (2017)
  • P.C. Coradi et al.

    Potential contaminants agents in feed mills: Risks to the health of the handlers

  • J.E.L. Corry et al.

    Sources of Salmonella on broiler carcasses during transportation and processing: Modes of contamination and methods of control

    Journal of Applied Microbiology

    (2002)
  • D. Cozzolino et al.

    Usefulness of near infrared reflectance (NIR) spectroscopy and chemometrics to discriminate between fishmeal, meat meal and soya meal samples

    Ciencia e Investigacian Agraria

    (2009)
  • Cited by (8)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text