Elsevier

Food Control

Volume 93, November 2018, Pages 219-225
Food Control

Long-term antibacterial efficacy of disinfectants based on benzalkonium chloride and sodium hypochlorite tested on surfaces against resistant gram-positive bacteria

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.06.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Gram-positive bacteria are involved in an increase of bacterial resistance.

  • Long-term bactericidal test to evaluate disinfectant products is developed.

  • Disinfectants with long-term activity have efficacy against resistant bacteria.

  • The use of disinfectants with long-term activity could be considered.

Abstract

The long-term antibacterial activity of disinfectant products based on benzalkonium chloride and sodium hypochlorite on surfaces was evaluated for prevention of bacterial adhesion. To this end, the European standard EN 13697, which determines the antibacterial activity of disinfectant formulations on bacteria, was adapted. As a prior step, the initial antibacterial activity (≥4 log10) was determined and after 24 h the long-term efficacy (≥3 log10) of each disinfectant product. Gram-positive bacteria belonging to the genera Staphylococci and Enterococci are able to survive in adverse conditions and have been involved in the increasing of bacterial resistance to different antimicrobials. In this study, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus hirae were selected as ‘indicator organisms’ for the presence of bacterial contamination. The results showed that all the disinfectant products based on benzalkonium chloride and sodium hypochlorite had an initial antibacterial activity of up to 4 log10. After 24 h, the benzalkonium chloride based products demonstrated long-term antibacterial efficacy for both bacterial strains. Sodium hypochlorite as a sole compound at 4.0% did not demonstrate long-term efficacy, but when it was formulated with sodium hydroxide, benzalkonium chloride, fatty alcohol ethoxylate and amine oxide, it was effective. The bactericidal test developed in this study fulfills the purpose of evaluating the long-term antibacterial efficacy of disinfectant products on surfaces.

Introduction

Foodborne diseases are a widespread public health problem that affect millions of people worldwide (Buzby & Roberts, 2009; EFSA, 2017; WHO, 2015, pp. 1–268). There are several factors that contribute to this kind of diseases, but one of the major factors is bacterial cross-contamination from surfaces to food (Kusumaningrum, Riboldi, Hazeleger, & Beumer, 2003). The food industry is greatly concerned with providing hygienic conditions to ensure the provision of safe, quality food with an acceptable shelf-life. Disinfection is the final step in hygienic procedures to prevent the growth of microorganisms on surfaces. However, if disinfection is insufficient, environmental free-living (planktonic) bacterial cells are able to adhere to surfaces and can form biofilms, which protect microorganisms from adverse conditions and result in the transmission of foodborne disease (DeVere & Purchase, 2007; Reij, Den Aantrekker, & ILSI Europe Risk Analysis in Microbiology Task Force, 2004; Satpathy, Sen, Pattanaik, & Raut, 2016).

Gram-positive bacteria belonging to the genera Staphylococci and Enterococci have a great ability to survive long periods in adverse conditions and have been involved in an increase in the presence of bacterial resistance to different antimicrobial products (Chaibenjawong & Foster, 2011; Kim, Ryu, Park, & Ryu, 2017; Neely & Maley, 2000; Rice, 2006; Ríos-Castillo, González-Rivas, & Rodríguez-Jerez, 2017). The lack of rigor in the rotation of disinfectants during their use and their wrong concentration in the formulations has been noted among the causes of increasing bacterial resistance (Langsrud, Sidhu, Heir, & Holck, 2003a; Meyer, 2006).

To demonstrate the effectiveness of commercial disinfectants under practical conditions, disinfectant products are tested according to standard methods using indicator organisms of food contamination. The term ‘indicator organisms’ has been used for nearly a century to assess the microbiological status of food production and food control systems. It includes evaluating the quality or safety of raw or processed food products and validating the effectiveness of microbial control measures (Halkman & Halkman, 2014; Tortorello, 2003).

Staphylococcus aureus is a common indicator of food contamination because this bacterium has been isolated in a variety of environments as an important source of cross-contamination (Le Loir, Baron, & Gautier, 2003; Rode, Langsrud, Holck, & Møretrø, 2007). This bacterium has been implicated in numerous outbreaks and cases of food poisoning worldwide (Grace & Fetsch, 2018). Likewise, it has a high ability to survive under adverse conditions for long periods, at least for 96 h on dry surfaces (Kusumaningrum et al., 2003), for more than 90 days in polyethylene (Neely & Maley, 2000), and 318 days in screw-top bottles (Wagenvoort, Sluijsmans, & Penders, 2000). Enterococcus spp can persist in food-processing facilities for a long time, so this genus could be monitored mainly as an indicator of process hygiene or food quality. Enterococcus counts are more reliable than coliform counts as an index of sanitary quality because the former is more adapt at surviving in adverse conditions (Byappanahalli, Nevers, Korajkic, Staley, & Harwood, 2012; Devriese, Pot, Van Damme, Kersters, & Haesebrouck, 1995; Halkman & Halkman, 2014; Jay, Loessner, & Golden, 2005). The characteristic to survive in adverse conditions, the potent and unique ability to exchange genetic material confer to Enterococcus an intrinsic and acquired resistance to practically all the antibiotics currently in use (Giraffa, 2014; Hollenbeck & Rice, 2012). Enterococcus is capable of colonizing both raw and heat-treated food. Therefore, their presence in food and other environmental sources may play a significant role in the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance and other virulence traits (Giraffa, 2014).

Products based on benzalkonium chloride and sodium hypochlorite are disinfectants commonly used in the food industry (Fazlara & Ekhtelat, 2012; Fukuzaki, 2006; Ríos-Castillo et al., 2017). Benzalkonium chloride is a quaternary ammonium compound (QACs) widely used in the food processing industry because it is more stable in the presence of organic matter and temperature fluctuations than other disinfectant products (Bessems, 1998; Gilbert & Moore, 2005; McDonnell & Russell, 1999; Taylor, Rogers, & Holah, 1999). Likewise, benzalkonium chloride is effective in preventing the bacterial adhesion and the process of biofilm formation at conventional in-use concentrations (Houari & Di Martino, 2007; Oosterhof, Buijssen, Busscher, van der Laan, & van der Mei, 2006). Sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) is the most widely used disinfectant in the food industry and has a broad spectrum against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, viruses and spores (Fukuzaki, 2006). Besides, this product has the property to remove adhered organisms from surfaces (McDonnell & Russell, 1999).

The European standard EN 13697:2015 is a quantitative test of contamination on non-porous surfaces for assessing the microbiological efficacy of chemical disinfectants using indicator organisms in the food industry. According to this standard, a reduction of surface attached bacteria of ≥4 log10 is required to rate a disinfectant as effective (Anonymous, 2015; Vestby et al., 2010). However, despite tests to rate the effectiveness of disinfectants in reducing microbial contamination, their lasting effects are relatively brief. Between 20 min and 3 h after disinfection, surfaces were shown to revert to a state of contamination in places with conditions favorable for the growth of microorganisms (Scott, Bloomfield, & Barlow, 1984).

Controlling microbial colonization on surfaces represents one of the challenges in food environments where microbial communities are problematic. Adapting different strategies, such as (1) surface impregnation with antimicrobial agents (Myszka & Czaczyk, 2011) and (2) developing disinfectants with long-term properties are measures to prevent bacterial adhesion and growth on surfaces. Today, many disinfectant products are available that assure effective protection against a posterior possible bacterial adhesion on surfaces.

Nevertheless, there is no method to evaluate the long-term antibacterial efficacy of disinfectant products to demonstrate whether they retain their effectiveness over time. The objective of this study was to adapt the European standard EN 13697:2015 to evaluate the long-term antibacterial efficacy of disinfectant products (benzalkonium chloride and sodium hypochlorite), comparing the results of their initial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus hirae obtained using the regular standard method on surfaces.

Section snippets

Test material

Stainless steel (as non-porous surfaces) type 1.4301 (also known as AISI 304) 2.0 cm in diameter and 1.2 mm thick were used. Prior to performing the study, the surfaces were cleaned by immersion in an aqueous detergent (Dipol® D.I.S. DINO S.L., Madrid, Spain) for 1 h, rinsed, and introduced into a solution of 70% isopropyl alcohol (2-propanol) (Panreac Química S.L.U., Castellar del Vallès, Spain) for 15 min. Then, the surfaces were sterilized using an autoclave at 121 °C for 15 min (Anonymous,

Benzalkonium chloride based products

The products based on benzalkonium chloride in the different dilutions of the study showed an initial activity at 0 h (≥4 log10 reduction) and long-term antibacterial efficacy at 24 h (≥3 log10 reduction) for both bacteria tested, S. aureus and E. hirae (Table 2). The maximum initial activities at 0 h on S. aureus were observed with products B3 (6.93 log10 and 6.96 log10 at 1:1 or 1:2 dilutions, respectively) and B2 (6.81 log10 at 1:4 dilution). For E. hirae, the maximum initial activity at 1:1

Conclusions

The rotation of disinfectants and the use of products with long-term activity should be considered in practical conditions to prevent bacterial adherence on surfaces. Benzalkonium chloride in combination with sodium hydroxide or amine oxide in appropriate concentrations demonstrated long-term antibacterial efficacy against S. aureus and E. hirae. Sodium hypochlorite as a sole compound did not demonstrate long-term activity, but this activity was achieved when it was formulated with other

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dolors Busquets Soler for her technical assistance and to Mrs. Sarah Davis for English grammar revision.

References (66)

  • H.D. Kusumaningrum et al.

    Survival of foodborne pathogens on stainless steel surfaces and cross-contamination to foods

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2003)
  • S. Langsrud et al.

    Bacterial disinfectant resistance—a challenge for the food industry

    International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation

    (2003)
  • B. Meyer

    Does microbial resistance to biocides create a hazard to food hygiene?

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2006)
  • T. Meylheuc et al.

    Adsorption of a biosurfactant on surfaces to enhance the disinfection of surfaces contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2006)
  • T.M. Mosteller et al.

    Sanitizer efficacy against attached bacteria in a milk biofilm

    Journal of Food Protection

    (1993)
  • M.W. Reij et al.

    Recontamination as a source of pathogens in processed foods

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2004)
  • L.B. Rice

    Antimicrobial resistance in gram-positive bacteria

    American Journal of Infection Control

    (2006)
  • T.M. Rode et al.

    Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2007)
  • S. Satpathy et al.

    Review on bacterial biofilm: An universal cause of contamination

    Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology

    (2016)
  • M. Sharma et al.

    Biofilms evaluation as an essential component of HACCP for food/dairy processing industry - a case

    Food Control

    (2002)
  • J.L. Speier et al.

    Destruction of microorganisms by contact with solid surfaces

    Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

    (1982)
  • G. Sundheim et al.

    Bacterial resistance to disinfectants containing quaternary ammonium compounds

    International Biodeterrioration & Biodegradation

    (1998)
  • J.H.T. Wagenvoort et al.

    Better environmental survival of outbreak vs. sporadic MRSA isolates

    Journal of Hospital Infection

    (2000)
  • K. Aarnisalo et al.

    Bactericidal efficiencies of commercial disinfectants against Listeria monocytogenes on surfaces

    Journal of Food Safety

    (2000)
  • Anonymous

    Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Quantitative non-porous surface test for the evaluation of bactericidal and/or fungicidal activity of chemical disinfectants used in food, industrial, domestic and institutional areas. Test method and requirements without mechanical action (phase 2/step 2)

    (2015)
  • AOAC International

    Official methods of analysis of AOAC international

  • M.N. Byappanahalli et al.

    Enterococci in the environment

    Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews

    (2012)
  • P. Chaibenjawong et al.

    Desiccation tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus

    Archives of Microbiology

    (2011)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Chlorine penetration into artificial biofilm is limited by a reaction–diffusion interaction

    Environmental Science & Technology

    (1996)
  • T. Cloete et al.

    Surfactants and the attachment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to 3CR12 stainless steel and glass

    WaterSA

    (2001)
  • B. Cords et al.

    Sanitizers: Halogens, surface-active agents, and peroxides

  • D. De Beer et al.

    Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms during disinfection

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology

    (1994)
  • T.J. Eaton et al.

    Molecular screening of Enterococcus virulence determinants and potential for genetic exchange between food and medical isolates

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text