Elsevier

Food Control

Volume 23, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 234-237
Food Control

Effects of the processing steps on parathion levels during honey production and parathion removal by macroporous adsorption resins

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.07.020Get rights and content

Abstract

The effects of different steps in honey production on parathion levels and parathion removal from honey using macroporous adsorption resins (MARs) were investigated in this study. Parathion residues were quantified by gas chromatography with flame photometric detection (GC-FPD) after each processing step including preheating, filtration, vacuum concentration and pasteurization. The four processing steps could reduce the initial parathion level of 2.77 to 2.73, 2.53, 2.30 and 2.23 mg/kg, respectively, and the total loss of parathion was only 19%. Meanwhile, different types of MARs were used in parathion adsorption, and the results from removal experiments showed that LS-803 resin was more efficient in removing parathion from honey than other resins LS-903, LSA-21 and LSA-900B, with the adsorption rate of above 90%.

Highlights

► We studied the effects of processing steps in honey production on parathion levels. ► We screened four macroporous adsorption resins for removing parathion from honey. ► LS-803 resin was selected as the optimal resin for removing parathion from honey.

Introduction

Parathion (O, O-diethyl-O-4-nitro-phenyl thiophosphate) is one of the most widely applied organophosphorus (OPs) insecticides in agriculture (Wu & Linden, 2008). Parathion is of great public health concern because it is associated with acute toxicity to mammals through the inhibition of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in the nervous system (Pope, Karanth, & Liu, 2005). In addition, the previous studies showed that a long-term exposure to parathion would even cause environmental deterioration (Ghauch, Rima, Amine, & Martin-Bouyer, 1999), ecological threats (Rodriguez et al., 2006, Roque et al., 2005, Sarkar et al., 2007, Sultatos, 1986), as well as adverse health effects upon the public (Muttray et al., 2005, Slotkin et al., 2009). Thus, parathion has been banned in many developed countries like the USA (US EPA, 2000). However, the use of parathion continues in many developing countries including China, where the application of parathion is still legal for crops other than vegetables, fruits, teas or herbal medicines (Agriculture Ministry, China, 2007).

Honey is a natural, nutritious and healthy food produced by honeybees from nectar of plants or honeydew. It is susceptible to environmental factors such as air, water, soil and plants that honeybees can contact directly. Obviously, the unobservant and extensive usage of OPs in agricultural practice can mainly conduce to pesticides contamination carried out by bees’ pollination (Bozena, 2002, Otero et al., 2007, Rissaton et al., 2007). During honey processing, raw honey can be usually processed through several unit treatments such as washing, heating, concentrating and filtering. These unit steps are important factors that lead to reduction of pesticide residues (Uygun, Senoz, Öztürk, & Koksel, 2009). Despite the fact that the effects of food processing on pesticide residues have been extensively reviewed by researchers (Uygun et al., 2008, Uygun et al., 2009, Zhu et al., 2010), there exist the limited investigations in to the persistence of parathion as residues in honey. Thus, it is important to evaluate the effects of honey processing on parathion to determine whether the insecticide level can be managed through the post-harvest procedures. Information on the parathion persistence during processing will be useful for the development of an effective food safety program for honey.

Generally, the contaminated honey should be disused if the residue levels of pesticides exceed the maximum residue limits (MRLs). Yet this way may cause a large amount of wastes which remain lots of beneficial substances underutilized. As the pesticide residues in honey are reduced to the level below MRLs, the unqualified honey can be reused as a sweetener in food industry. Therefore, in order to reduce parathion in honey, it is necessary to establish reliable, efficient and economical methods that fit the requirement of production. Some researchers had previously reported several methods to reduce parathion by ultrasonic degradation, ozonedegradation and photodegradation (Doong and Chang, 1998, Nowakowska et al., 2004, Yao et al., 2010). However, these methods may have such disadvantages as high production cost and more toxic transformation products or metabolites, which are not suitable for large-scale industrial production. Accordingly, the use of MARs for removing parathion from honey shows such various superior aspects as low cost, simple operation, high efficiency, free pollution and easy regeneration (Liu, Liu, Chen, Liu, & Di, 2010).

The objectives of the study were (1) to investigate the effects of different processing steps including preheating, filtration, vacuum concentration and pasteurization on parathion residue levels and (2) to evaluate the parathion adsorption abilities of four types of MARs and to select the optimal MARs for removing parathion from honey.

Section snippets

Chemicals

Parathion standard (>99.5% pure) was purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Augsburg, Germany). Ethyl acetate, acetone and sodium chloride were analytical grade and purchased from Tianjin Reagent Co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Acetone was redistilled before its use.

Adsorbents

Macroporous adsorption resins (MARs) including LS-903 and LS-803 were purchased from Xi’an Grancent Exchange and Adsorbent Material Ltd. (Shaanxi province, China), LSA-900B and LSA-21 were offered from Xi’an Sunresin Technology Co., Ltd.

Recovery experiments

The method used for parathion determination in this study was efficient. Recovery rates of parathion was obtained by spiking the honey with 0.5, 2, 5 mg/kg in triplicate ranging from 81% to 113% for parathion and the relative standard deviations (RSD) for repeatability ranging from 0.006 to 0.132. The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.05 mg/kg. Linearity was determined by analyzing seven calibration standards within the concentration ranging from 0.1 to 5 mg/kg (in acetone), and the correlation

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that during honey processing, vacuum concentration could contribute the most in the reduction of parathion level, followed by filtration processing, pasteurization and preheating. Meanwhile, the adsorption abilities of different types of MARs were estimated and the results showed that LS-803 resin had the highest adsorption ability for parathion adsorption when compared with other three resins LS-903, LSA-21 and LSA-900B. Consequently, LS-803 resin was selected

References (27)

Cited by (18)

  • Effect of processing steps on phenolic profile of rape honey (Brassica napus) using HPLC-ECD

    2022, LWT
    Citation Excerpt :

    In honey production, different processing steps are used to ensure favorable sensory characteristics of honey in the commercial sale, including the processing units of preheating, filtration, moisture reduction and pasteurization (Fig. 1) (Xu et al., 2012).

  • Synthesis and characterization of polypyrrole, polyaniline nanoparticles and their nanocomposite for removal of azo dyes; sunset yellow and Congo red

    2018, Journal of Cleaner Production
    Citation Excerpt :

    Application of conductive polymers is an alternative coating agent that can eliminate the previous disadvantages and improve selectivity. Polypyrrole (PPy) and polyaniline (PANI) have extremely become popular for coating on the surface of nano materials (Sathishkumar et al., 2012; Yong et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2009; Aftab et al., 2010; Khomenko et al., 2005; Philip et al., 2004; Ruihan et al., 2012). Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are the strongest and stiffest materials yet discovered in terms of tensile strength and elastic modulus respectively.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text