Elsevier

Food Chemistry

Volume 116, Issue 3, 1 October 2009, Pages 806-810
Food Chemistry

Analytical Methods
Polymerase chain reaction assay for identification of chicken in meat and meat products

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.030Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for specific detection of chicken meat using designed primer pair based on mitochondrial D-loop gene for amplification of 442 bp DNA fragments from fresh, processed and autoclaved meat and meat products. The PCR result was further verified by restriction digestion with HaeIII and Sau3AI enzymes for specific cutting site in amplified DNA fragments. The specificity of assay was cross tested with DNA of cattle, buffalo, sheep, goat, pig, duck, guinea fowl, turkey and quail, where amplification was observed only in chicken without cross reactivity with red meat species. However positive reaction was also observed in quail and turkey. In this study, no adverse effects of cooking and autoclaving were found on amplification of chicken DNA fragments. Thus, the detection limits was found to be less than 1% in admixed meat and meat products. The developed assay was found specific and sensitive for rapid identification of admixed chicken meat and meat products processed under different manufacturing conditions.

Introduction

The adulteration/substitution of meat has always been a concern for various reasons such as public health, religious factors, wholesomeness and unhealthy competition in meat market (Arslan et al., 2006, Mane et al., 2006). Consumer should be protected from these malicious practices of meat adulterations by quick, precise and specific identification of species present in meat and meat products. Various methods are employed for detection of species origin of meat. These include sensory evaluation to latest DNA based assays. DNA based assays are gaining popularity in meat species identification due to their stability at high temperature and conserved structure within all individual of the species (Calvo et al., 2001, Girish et al., 2004). Earlier, DNA based assay employed for identification of species origin of meat was DNA hybridisation (Baur, Teifel-Greiding, & Leibhardt, 1987) but nowadays that has been replaced by PCR assays.

The PCR assays are employed for identification of species origin of meat using random primers (Saez, Sanz, & Toldra, 2004) to amplify the non-targeted DNA, while universal primers are used (Girish et al., 2005, Verkaar et al., 2002) for amplification of targeted genomic and mitochondrial DNA followed by restrictive enzyme digestion to differentiate meat species. The results of RAPD–PCR are non-reproducible due to requirement of high stringent conditions (Koh, Lim, Chua, Chew, & Phang, 1998), while PCR–RFLP is more time consuming, require more analytical work and result interpretation is complex. The result interpretation is even more complex in admixture meat and meat products (Irfan-Ilhak & Arslan, 2007). The specific detection of species origin of meat by PCR using species-specific primers is relatively quick, precise, sensitive and cost effective as compared to other PCR based assay (Mane et al., 2007). This species-specific PCR assay was previously used by various workers for detection of various mammalian and poultry species in meat and meat products (Arslan et al., 2006, Meyer et al., 1994).

These PCR assays targets genomic as well as mitochondrial DNA for the purpose of meat species identification, even in cooked meat under different processing conditions. However, in the present study the mitochondrial DNA was used for meat species identification because of the maternal inheritance of mitochondria, normally only one allele exists in an individual and thus no sequence ambiguities are expected from the presence of more than one allele (Unseld, Beyermann, Brandt, & Hiesel, 1995). The variable regions of the mitochondrial gene are present in thousands of copies per cell (Greenwood & Paboo, 1999), which increases the probability of achieving a positive result even in severe DNA fragmentation due to intense processing conditions (Bellagamba, Moretti, Comincini, & Valfre, 2001). Keeping the above facts and considering future implications in the meat trade, the present study was planned with the overall objective to develop simple, quick, sensitive, precise, cost effective and applicable method for identification of chicken meat and meat products processed under different manufacturing conditions by PCR assay.

Section snippets

Meat and blood samples

The fresh meat samples of buffalo, sheep, goat, pig, chicken and duck were collected from the local municipal slaughterhouses. While the guinea fowl, turkey and quail samples were collected from central avian research institute. After collection, samples were kept at −20 °C till further processing. The blood samples were collected from specific breeds of species under investigation from different sources. The blood was collected in sterile 15 ml polypropylene tube containing 0.5 ml of 0.5 M

Results and discussion

Precise, authentic and rapid testing of animal origin foods is indispensable to avoid unfair market competition and protection of consumer from fraudulent practices of meat adulteration. So, the aim of the study was to develop and evaluate the species-specific PCR assay for identification of chicken species in meat and meat products processed under different manufacturing conditions. The species-specific primer pair was designed based on mitochondrial D-loop gene for amplification of about 442 

Conclusions

The species-specific PCR assay was found to be precise, sensitive and rapid methods for routine analysis of meat species, even in admixed meat and meat products under different processing conditions. Thus, it can be concluded that the species-specific PCR assay can be useful tool for routine assessments of authenticity and quality of meat and meat products to protect the consumers from fraudulent practices of meat substitution.

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to Director, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122 (India) for providing necessary facilities for the present work.

References (24)

Cited by (100)

  • Food adulteration with genetically modified soybeans and maize, meat of animal species and ractopamine residues in different food products

    2022, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Food adulteration entails the use of different animal species (dog, donkey, pork, horse, sheep, chicken and cat) mixed with bovine meat, as well as the use of some feed additives promoting growth such as RAC residue to increase quantity and reduce production costs [3]. The examination of adulteration should be performed frequently due to the religious affairs, fraud and malicious marketing practices, health risks such as specific food allergies and mutations besides the economic and legal concerns [4]. GMOs are considered one of the main food adulteration technologies and illegal additives that involves inserting foreign genes from animals, bacteria, viruses, or other plant species into crops [5].

  • Species-specific TM-LAMP and Trident-like lateral flow biosensor for on-site authenticity detection of horse and donkey meat

    2019, Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
    Citation Excerpt :

    Presently, many studies focus on the use of endogenous reference genes to detect the origin of animal meat products. Currently, mitochondrial genes such as cytb as the endogenous reference gene of pig [28], Nd2 gene as the endogenous reference gene of donkey [29] and D-loop as the endogenous reference gene of chicken [30], are usually selected as endogenous reference genes. However, due to the high conservativeness of mitochondrial genes and the substantial similarity between related species, adequate distinction and identification proves challenging.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text