ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Volume 45, Issue 8, August 2007, Pages 1496-1506
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (911 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.02.009    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

A probabilistic model for simultaneous exposure to multiple compounds from food and its use for risk–benefit assessment

Hilko van der Voeta, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Anika de Mulb and Jacob D. van Klaverenb

aBiometris, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 100, NL-6700 AC Wageningen, Netherlands bRIKILT – Institute of Food Safety, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 230, NL 6700 AE Wageningen, Netherlands

Received 27 June 2006; 
accepted 11 February 2007. 
Available online 17 February 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

A model is presented which allows to quantify the simultaneous distribution of the exposure to two compounds, for example a health-risk and a health promoting compound. The model considers the total dietary intake, and can be used as a first step to study the effects on the balance between risks and benefits following changes in the consumption pattern. The exposure is modelled separately for intake probabilities using a betabinomial model, and for intake amounts using a lognormal model, and these parts are afterwards integrated by Monte Carlo simulation. The model is illustrated using the risk–benefit case of dioxins and the omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). High concentrations of both the health adverse compounds and the health promoting compounds are simultaneously present in fatty fish. Calculated exposures were compared with intake limits: the adequate intake for EPA + DHA and the tolerable daily intake (TDI) for dioxins. We estimate the probability that dioxin exposure is below TDI, the probability that EPA + DHA exposure is above the adequate intake, and the probability that both conditions occur simultaneously. We also model the dependence of these probabilities on age.

In the studied population the exposure to both compounds is almost completely below the limits. A scenario study in which meat consumption was replaced by fatty fish consumption shows an increase in the fraction of the population with the recommended intake of EPA + DHA, however also the fraction of the population exceeding the TDI for dioxins is increased. For the example scenario the optimal amount of fatty fish consumption is derived.

Keywords: Probabilistic risk assessment; Betabinomial–lognormal model; Long-term intake; Dioxin; Fish fatty acids

Abbreviations: CPAP, conversion to primary agricultural products; DALY, disability adjusted life years; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; DNFCS, Dutch National Food Consumption Survey; EAR, estimated average requirement; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; TDI, tolerable daily intake; TEF, toxic equivalence factor; TEQ, toxic equivalent; TWI, tolerable weekly intake; PCB, polychlorobiphenyl; PCDF, polychlorinated dibenzofuran; PCDD, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin; RDA, recommended dietary allowance; REML, residual maximum likelihood; WHO, World Health Organization

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Intake probabilities
2.2. Intake amounts
2.3. Long-term intakes
2.4. Extensions of the model and scenario analysis
3. Example and dataset
3.1. Food sampling, dioxin data and EPA + DHA data
3.2. Consumption data
3.3. Limit values
4. Results
4.1. Estimation of risk–benefit exposure
4.2. Scenario analysis
4.3. Age dependency
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References








Food and Chemical Toxicology
Volume 45, Issue 8, August 2007, Pages 1496-1506
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.