Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 78, Issue 6, December 2020, Pages 831-833
European Urology

Platinum Priority – Editorial
Referring to the article published on pp. 822–830 of this issue.
A “Tail” of Immunotherapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.040Get rights and content

Section snippets

Radiotherapy plus immunotherapy

Preclinical and clinical evidence supports the combination of radiation and immunotherapy, although clear evidence of a true abscopal effect in human randomized controlled trials remains elusive. CA184-043 is similar in some respects to the PACIFIC trial in non–small-cell lung cancer, a randomized phase 3 trial of durvalumab after chemoradiation that showed significant improvements in OS [4] with CPI following treatment with both cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation. As radiation does,

Reducing early OS declines

Both the CA184-043 and CA184-095 trials showed early lowering of OS curves when compared to the control groups; while not universally seen with immunotherapy, this has been seen in other trials with CPI [8]. In several immunotherapy trials, a disconnect between PFS and OS can also be seen. The reasons for such findings are varied and complex, but no doubt encompass both drug-mediated toxicity issues and delayed onset and/or the effect of antitumor responses in the setting of progressive

Optimal timing of immunotherapy

The initial report on CA184-043 suggested that ipilimumab might provide the most benefit in patients with favorable prognostic features: a post hoc analysis revealed median OS of 22.7 mo versus 15.8 mo in the placebo group (p =  0.038). Similarly, an analysis of patients treated with sipuleucel-T in the IMPACT trial showed the greatest increase in OS for the lowest prostate-specific antigen quartile versus the highest when compared to the control group [10]. Along with numerous preclinical

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (5)

View full text