Short communicationEnergy information engagement among the poor: Predicting participation in a free workshop
Section snippets
Methods
We conducted face-to-face interviews (n = 61) with applicants to the Durham County, NC (USA), Department of Social Services Low-Income Energy Assistance Program. (We interviewed applicants separately from the application process and interviewees were not necessarily eligible for assistance.) Respondents received an LED flashlight for their time.
We focus in this brief on analysis of closed-ended items regarding participant intention to attend future energy workshops or meetings. To account for
Participant description
Participants ranged in age from 24 to 78, with a median age of 43. They were mostly female (90%) and African-American (96%). Median annual household income was less than $20,000 (US); 64% reported less than $20,000 in annual household income. Most (87%) rented their residence and nearly half of all participants lived in a freestanding house.
Living experience
The majority (57%) of participants reported living in a home that was “drafty” most or all of the time during most recent winter. Most (75%) also reported
Conclusion
The low-income participants in our study reported considerable need for weatherization and expressed interest in receiving energy education. At the same time, however, predictive models of intended engagement with educational meetings suggested noteworthy constraints on meeting attendance. Although general attitude toward energy education workshops did not predict future attendance, personal circumstance, community norms, and perceived accessibility of energy information all played predictive
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank other members of the team: Emily Conner, Drew Howard, and Sidharth Sharma. Sheree Knight and staff members with Durham County Social Services graciously facilitated data collection. Duke University's Bass Connections in Energy program funded this project and staff members of Duke's Energy Initiative were helpful, including Kyle Bradbury, David Doctor, Steve Hicks, and Richard Newell, as were Dan Curry and Ann Roy.
References (7)
- et al.
From if only to social potential in schemes to reduce building energy use
Energy Res Soc Sci
(2014) Dragon-breath and snow-melt: know-how, experience and heat flows in the home
Energy Res Soc Sci
(2014)- et al.
Weatherization behavior and social context: the influences of factual knowledge and social interaction
Energy Res Soc Sci
(2014)
Cited by (9)
Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design
2018, Energy Research and Social ScienceCitation Excerpt :These can be difficult to access due to small or non-existent sampling frames, yet their viewpoints can provide an important, often missing contribution to a given literature. Finally, sensitive or vulnerable populations can include the survivors of energy accidents such as those at Chernobyl [151] or Fukushima [152], indigenous peoples [153–155], children [156], the elderly or ill [157,158], and the chronically poor [159–161]. Understandably, strategies for accessing these groups will be completely different from those for elites and experts, and will require cultural sensitivity and careful attention to ethics.
Renewable energy research and technologies through responsible research and innovation looking glass: Reflexions, theoretical approaches and contemporary discourses
2018, Applied EnergyCitation Excerpt :The relevance of ensuring energy education at all levels is an issue globally recognized. Revising science education [105], the aspects found were energy education [106], renewable energy education [106–109], as the treatment of various topics and issues related to renewable energy resources and technologies (as an independent subject or correlated with social acceptance [86]), energy poverty [110,111], consumption behaviour [112,113], and communication and diffusion. On the other hand, energy education devoted to promote public awareness, to the development of consumer confidence, as well as related with training experts, and educational efforts addressed to training policy analysts, advisors, and future customers were found [106].
Justice, fuel poverty and disabled people in England
2015, Energy Research and Social ScienceCitation Excerpt :Whilst presenting a case study of English fuel poverty rates and policy interventions, the paper contributes to broader debates around fuel poverty, vulnerability, and policy. In particular, the paper builds on previous work published within this journal, helping to inform knowledge about the manifestation of fuel poverty in different national contexts (complementing the work of Bazilian et al. [16] and Southwell et al. [13]); furthering knowledge about the nature and impact of energy related policies (as highlighted by Johnston et al. [28], O’sullivan et al. [29]); and contributing to the body of knowledge that considers the needs and experiences of the fuel poor [29,30]. In particular it complements the work by Walker et al. [25] by using a similar conceptual framework of justice to critically assess the relationship between national fuel poverty policy and vulnerable groups.
Benefit or burden? Perceptions of energy efficiency efforts among low-income housing residents in New York City
2015, Energy Research and Social ScienceCitation Excerpt :While we know these ‘fruit’ produce definite and high yielding benefits compared to other proposed energy conservation or climate change strategies, the full range of potential benefits associated with energy efficiency remain largely unexplored [8]. Studies by Southwell et al. have demonstrated that there is interest among low-income households to learn more about weatherization, and that people who understand weatherization and share that knowledge within their social networks are more likely to weatherize [9,10]. In spite of the obvious and considerable financial, environmental and probable health benefits, low-income householders face crucial barriers in adopting home energy efficiency and weatherization measures due to large upfront costs and limited decision-making authority for renters.
Public participation in energy saving retrofitting of residential buildings in China
2015, Applied EnergyCitation Excerpt :Some scholars argue that bottom-up processes and ‘grassroots innovations’ with intensive resident participation are key factors to ensure successful retrofitting of residential building projects (e.g. [26]. Education strategies that provide energy tips, information, and factual knowledge, and relevant social interaction in social networks of residents have been acknowledged as playing an important roles in determining household energy use behavior [27,28]. When households do not know, understand or accept advanced energy saving technologies related to retrofitting, implementing such energy efficient technologies can only provide sub-optimal results [29,30].
Community Energy in Germany: A Social Science Perspective
2023, Community Energy in Germany: A Social Science Perspective