ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (2214 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.007    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Methane formation at Costa Rica continental margin—constraints for gas hydrate inventories and cross-décollement fluid flow

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Christian HensenCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, b, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Klaus Wallmanna, b

aSFB574, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Wischhofstr. 1-3, 24148 Kiel, Germany

bLeibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften, IFM-GEOMAR, Wischhofstr. 1-3, 24148 Kiel, Germany


Received 30 November 2004; 
revised 9 June 2005; 
accepted 9 June 2005. 
Editor: E. Boyle. 
Available online 1 July 2005.

Abstract

We present a numerical model study in order to quantify the effects of organic carbon (POC) degradation and fluid migration on methane and gas hydrate formation at ODP site 1040 (Costa Rica convergent margin). Various model runs show that POC-degradation in upper plate sediments yields a potential for methane hydrate formation between 0.8 and 2.5 vol.% of pore space. However, observed chlorinity anomalies cannot be explained by the amount and the distribution pattern of gas hydrates. Moreover, pore water profiles of ammonia do not match the observations. Setting up a moderate upward flow (0.03 cm yr− 1) of methane-enriched, low-chlorinity fluids (induced by dewatering of oceanic plate sediments) leads to a good approximation to measured pore water profiles, thus enabling a precise estimate of POC degradation kinetics. Fluid flow has a strong impact on the location of the upper limit of the modeled gas hydrate occurrence zone (GHOZ) and may increase the total amount of gas hydrate by more than 50%. Our best estimate of the amount of gas hydrate within the GHOZ is on average 1.65 vol.% of pore space, which corresponds to about 2.5 Tg of methane per km trench within the frontal prism of slope sediments.

To comply with the fact that subducted pore waters are rich in sulfate and that there is striking evidence for fluid conduits at various depths we performed additional model runs, where we simulated fluid flow by using a Gauss-type rate law, allowing us to define distinct fluid sources. We can demonstrate that combined methane production in the upper plate sediments and sulfate reduction at the top of the down going slab is sufficient to prevent the upward movement of the zone of anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) to above the décollement at given upward advection rates. Steep pore water gradients along the plate boundary can be explained by lateral backflow within oceanic plate sediments. On a long term (in the order of at least some 100,000 years), fluid flow along conduits is likely to occur at low rates with temporarily increased pulses. All modeled runs are constrained by their compatibility to observed pore water profiles.

Keywords: gas hydrate; fluids; chloride; subduction zone; numerical modelling

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Geologic setting and geochemical background
3. Model description
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Isolated upper plate approach
4.1.1. Decomposition of organic matter and formation of gas hydrate
4.1.2. Impact of deep fluid chemistry and upward fluid flow
4.2. Combining upper and lower plate modeling
4.2.1. Effect of fluid inflow via distinct conduits
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References











Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 431 6002567; fax: +49 431 6002947.

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.