ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (602 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.011    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Evidence for large century time-scale changes in solar activity in the past 32 Kyr, based on in-situ cosmogenic 14C in ice at Summit, Greenland

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Devendra Lala, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, A.J.T. Jullb, E-mail The Corresponding Author, David Pollardc, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Loic Vachera

aScripps Institution of Oceanography, Geosciences Research Division, La Jolla, CA 92093-0244, USA

bUniversity of Arizona, NSF Arizona AMS Laboratory, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

cPennsylvania State University, EMS Environment Institute, 2217 Earth-Engineering Sciences, University Park, PA 16802-6813, USA


Received 8 July 2004; 
revised 9 February 2005; 
accepted 14 February 2005. 
Editor: K. Farley. 
Available online 13 May 2005.

Abstract

We present results of estimates of cosmic ray flux in Greenland at the Summit (3200 m.a.s.l, 72.6°N, 38.5°W), during the past 32 Kyr. We derive these estimates based on concentrations of in-situ cosmogenic 14C produced in ice crystals. Based on the secular equilibrium concentration of in-situ produced 14C in quartz in terrestrial rocks, we find that on century time-scales, the cosmic ray production rate of 14C at the Summit was close to its estimated long-term average production rate, except during 3 periods: (i) during 8500–9500 yr B.P. and 27,000–32,000 yr B.P, when the production rate was higher by about a factor of 2, and (ii) during 12,000–16,000 yr B.P, when the production rate was lower by a factor of not, vert, similar 1.5. The observed variation in cosmic ray flux at the polar site is best attributed to changes in solar activity resulting in variable modulation of terrestrial cosmic ray flux. Changes in the geomagnetic field in the past do not affect the cosmic ray flux at polar latitudes. Likewise, climate changes do not affect the in-situ 14C record in ice.

During the first two epochs, the solar activity must have been very low, as during Maunder Minimum (virtually no sunspots), resulting in essentially no modulation of the cosmic ray flux by the solar plasma. During the low cosmic ray flux epoch, 12,000–16,000 yr B.P., the observed decrease in cosmic ray flux corresponds to high solar activity as seen in 1958 (sun-spot number not, vert, similar 190).

We discuss the proxy evidence from tree ring and sediment based records of atmospheric 14C/12C ratios during the three epochs. These records have been used as a measure of changes in cosmic ray flux, and solar activity in the past. However, since they are also appreciably affected by climatic changes, a comparison of the two records is potentially valuable for delineating the nature of past changes in solar activity, and large-scale ocean circulation and air–sea exchange.

Keywords: solar activity; cosmic ray fluxes; cosmogenic 14C in polar ice; sun spot numbers; geomagnetic indices

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Experimental
3. Interpretation of in-situ 14C data
3.1. (14CO/(14CO + 14CO2)) ratios in the in-situ 14C in ice samples
3.2. Estimation of cosmic ray flux at Summit in the past 32 Kyr, from in-situ 14C data
4. Interpretation of estimated cosmic ray flux variations at Summit during the past 32 Kyr
4.1. Atmospheric pressure changes in the past
4.2. Records of changes in cosmic ray flux in the past, and expected cosmic ray flux at the Summit during periods of low solar activity
5. Proxy evidence for marked changes of solar activity in the past
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References







Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author.

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.