doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.07.013
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Characteristics of MEG and MRI between Taylor's focal cortical dysplasia (type II) and other cortical dysplasia: Surgical outcome after complete resection of MEG spike source and MR lesion in pediatric cortical dysplasia
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Elysa Widjajaa,
,
, Hiroshi Otsubob, Charles Raybauda, Ayako Ochib, Derrick Chanb, James T. Rutkac, O. Carter Snead IIIb, William Hallidayd, Ryoichi Sakutad, Elaine Galiciab, Ilan Shelefa and Sylvester H. Chuanga
aDiagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8
bDepartment of Neurology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
cDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
dDepartment of Pathology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Received 6 May 2008;
revised 11 July 2008;
accepted 20 July 2008.
Available online 7 September 2008.
Summary
Purpose
Cortical dysplasia (CD) has been classified as Taylor's focal cortical dysplasia (FCD type II) or other CD (FCD type I and mild malformation of cortical development) based on histological findings. The aims of this study were to determine whether MRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG) could distinguish between these two groups and to evaluate surgical outcomes.
Methods
We evaluated the MRI features, MEG spike source (MEGSS) patterns (clusters or scatters) and postsurgical seizure outcomes of 27 children with CD.
Results
Thirteen patients had Taylor's FCD and 14 had other CD. MRI showed visible lesion in 22 (81%) patients. Tapering of abnormal white matter signals to the ventricles and cortical thickening were more prevalent in Taylor's FCD; focal hypoplasia and white matter atrophy were more prevalent in other CD. MEG showed spike sources in 26 (96%) patients. Taylor's FCD showed clustered MEGSSs in 6, both clustered and scattered MEGSSs in 5 and scattered MEGSSs in 2; other CD demonstrated clusters in 2, cluster and scatter in 10 and scatter in 1. Eleven (85%) of 13 patients who had complete resection of clustered MEGSSs achieved Engel class I outcome, but 4 (44%) of 9 patients with incomplete resections achieved class I. Fifteen (88%) of 17 patients who had complete resection of MRI lesions achieved class I, but 1 (33%) of 3 patients with incomplete lesionectomy was class I. There was no difference in surgical outcomes between Taylor's FCD and other CD.
Conclusions
Surgical outcome was the same in both groups following complete removal of areas containing clustered MEGSSs and MR lesions.
Keywords: Cortical dysplasia; Taylor's focal cortical dysplasia; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetoencephalography; Pediatric; MEG spike source
Figure 1. Case of Taylor's focal cortical dysplasia. (a) Axial T2 demonstrates abnormal signal in the subcortical white matter of the right frontal lobe with tapering of abnormal signal towards the ventricle (arrow). (b) Axial 3D T1-weighted images demonstrate part of a cluster of magnetoencephalographic spike sources (MEGSSs) in the right frontal lobe (selected images with MEGSSs on the slice).
Figure 2. Case of other cortical dysplasias. (a) Axial T2 demonstrates reduced volume and abnormal signal in the left mesial parietal lobe (arrowheads). (b) Axial 3D T1-weighted image demonstrates a cluster of magnetoencephalographic spike sources (MEGSSs) with scatter MEGSSs in the right parietal lobe (all MEGSSs overlaid onto one slice).
Figure 3. Surgical outcome of Taylor's focal cortical dysplasia and other cortical dysplasia.
Table 1.
MR features associated with Taylor's focal cortical dysplasia and other cortical dysplasia

Table 2.
MEG features associated with Taylor's focal cortical dysplasia and other cortical dysplasia

Table 3.
Surgical outcome (Engel classification) with respect to resection of MR lesions, clustered and scattered MEG spike sources


Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 416 813 7654; fax: +1 416 813 5789.
|
Note to users: The section "Articles in Press" contains peer reviewed accepted articles to be published in this journal. When the final article is assigned to an issue of the journal, the "Article in Press" version will be removed from this section and will appear in the associated published journal issue. The date it was first made available online will be carried over. Please be aware that although "Articles in Press" do not have all bibliographic details available yet, they can already be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI as follows: Author(s), Article Title, Journal (Year), DOI. Please consult the journal's reference style for the exact appearance of these elements, abbreviation of journal names and the use of punctuation.
|
| There are three types of "Articles in Press": |
- Accepted manuscripts: these are articles that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by the Editorial Board. The articles have not yet been copy edited and/or formatted in the journal house style.
- Uncorrected proofs: these are copy edited and formatted articles that are not yet finalized and that will be corrected by the authors. Therefore the text could change before final publication.
- Corrected proofs: these are articles containing the authors' corrections and may, or may not yet have specific issue and page numbers assigned.
|