Elsevier

Environmental Research

Volume 155, May 2017, Pages 22-30
Environmental Research

Supplementary feeding and endoparasites in threatened avian scavengers: Coprologic evidence from red kites in their wintering stronghold

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.01.034Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Red kites feeding on livestock carcass show higher helminth infections than those feeding on wild prey.

  • Overcrowding of kites foraging on livestock carcasses can increase the acquisition and transmission of parasites.

  • Supplementary feeding stations can promote the spread of parasites to wintering individuals.

Abstract

Many obligate and facultative avian scavengers are increasingly dependent on food provided in supplementary feeding stations (SFS), which are managed for the conservation of these species. Deliberate feeding can influence disease-related host demography and population dynamics through physiological changes and density-dependent parasite acquisition and transmission, but information on this threat to avian scavengers is scarce. Due to their effects on host aggregation and density, we hypothesised that the predictability and concentration of food in SFS can exacerbate parasite infection. This hypothesis was tested by comparing the prevalence, richness, abundance and mixed infection of endoparasites (coccidia and helminths) in red kites Milvus milvus foraging on livestock carcasses (mostly of pigs and poultry) in overcrowded and confined conditions at SFS, relative to those foraging alone or in small groups on wild prey unevenly randomly distributed within large areas during winter, mostly wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). No clear differences were found between areas with and without SFS in the prevalence and abundance of oocyst of Eimeria. This coccidian genus appears to include parasites of the prey rather than the raptors, thus representing parasite transport or pseudo-parasitism rather than actual parasitism in the kites. A higher prevalence and richness of helminths, as well as mixed infections with several phyla, was found in kites exploiting SFS than in those feeding on wild prey in the area without SFS. The unsanitary conditions derived from the stack of livestock carcasses and the contamination of carrion with the faeces of multiple scavenger hosts can increase the accumulation and persistence of helminths eggs and intermediate hosts. The regular use and frequent confinement of large numbers of red kites at SFS can promote the spread of parasites to a large proportion of the European breeding population distributed across Spain during the winter. We encourage that carcasses of free roaming livestock can be left in the countryside, as well as the conservation management of wildlife exploited as food by red kites (especially wild rabbits), to attempt avoiding overcrowded and confined conditions at SFS. Further research is required to assess the impact of deliberate feeding on the spread of parasites and other disease agents in the threatened species SFS are intended to favour.

Introduction

The influence of human activities on the disease dynamics of wildlife populations is gaining increasing attention for its implications on biodiversity conservation and environmental health (Daszak et al., 2000, Aguirre and Tabor, 2008, Keesing et al., 2010, Gottdenker et al., 2014). In particular, human activities are increasingly altering food and foraging conditions of many wildlife species worldwide (Fischer and Lindenmayer, 2007, Sih et al., 2011, Oro et al., 2013). By providing food in predictable foraging sites, humans can intentionally or unintentionally modify the behaviour, distribution, and density of wildlife populations (Robb et al., 2008, Oro et al., 2013, Kubasiewicz et al., 2016). This can influence disease-related host demographics and population dynamics through physiological changes and density-dependent processes such as parasite acquisition and transmission (Arnsberg et al., 1998, Lebarbenchon et al., 2006, Becker et al., 2015). Therefore, evaluating whether the prevalence of particular parasites and concurrent infections are due to the hosts’ habits and environmental features which are influenced by anthropogenic effects is fundamental to understanding the health and dynamics of wildlife populations.

A wide array of parasites exploit the limited resources of their avian hosts, which promote diverse immune responses mediated through nutritional condition, and eventually can cause disease and death (Clayton and Moore, 1997, Ardia and Schat, 2008). Condition-dependent investment in immunity against parasites can be shaped by food availability and different diet compositions that influence nutritional status, which is a main component of individual quality determining individual fitness (Nelson, 2002). In addition, diet can determine the acquisition of food-borne parasites and pathogens (Friend and Franson, 1999, Mor-Mur and Yuste, 2010; Wiethoelter al, 2015). Other factors, such as foraging grounds, sociality, density and food searching strategies can also influence parasite acquisition and transmission (Arnsberg et al., 1998, Lebarbenchon et al., 2006, Becker et al., 2015). Knowledge on how these factors influence the prevalence and effects of parasites on raptors (Falconiformes and Accipitriformes) come from surveys of dead individuals with and without disease signs in recovery centres, or by examination of patent effects of disease during outbreaks (Friend and Franson, 1999, Lumeij et al., 2000). Comparatively less information has been obtained from apparently healthy individuals in wild populations (e.g. Coulson et al., 2010). Depending on virulence, the prevalence of parasites evaluated by random sampling in the wild can be influenced by the fact that infected individuals may be lost at variable rates due to associated mortality (Wobeser, 2013). Experiments relating infection and increasing parasite burdens with poor health and mortality can shed light on the role of parasites in population regulation (Pedersen and Fenton, 2015). In practice, experimental approaches involving threatened species are challenging, and it requires previous baseline information of the wide array of pathogens and parasites generally infecting the wild threatened populations (Wobeser, 2013). In addition, knowledge is very limited for wild birds on how environmental and population conditions and associated related habits, such as diet and overcrowding influence infection and transmission of parasites (Friend et al., 2001, Lebarbenchon et al., 2006, Ardia and Schat, 2008). Obtaining this kind of baseline information can be especially relevant for conservation purposes of threatened species (Cleaveland et al., 2002, Smith et al., 2006, Thompson et al., 2010).

Obligate and facultative avian scavengers are among the most threatened vertebrates (Ogada et al., 2012, Buechley and Şekercioğlu, 2016). Due to environmental degradation and intensification of agriculture affecting wild food sources, many scavenger species are increasingly dependent on carcasses of domestic livestock in supplementary feeding stations (SFS), which are managed for the conservation of these species (Cortés-Avizanda et al., 2016). The predictability and availability of food can determine the degree of the host's infection of particular parasites and pathogens (Lebarbenchon et al., 2006, Becker et al., 2015). Despite satisfying these conditions, few data are available on the role of SFS on scavengers’ nutritional condition and disease. This role can be amplified based on the dynamics and demographics of scavengers’ populations through several processes. First, food abundance and predictability can attract multiple conspecific and heterospecific scavengers, thus artificially increasing the host spatial concentration, overcrowding, intra- and inter-specific agonistic interactions, and spread of parasites in a particular location and its effects on stress and density-dependent host to host infection probability (Wright and Gompper, 2005, Lebarbenchon et al., 2006, Becker et al., 2015). Second, livestock carcasses from different farming operations, especially confined farming versus free-ranging farming operations, can vary in the probability of transmission of food-borne parasites and pathogens to scavengers, and it can differ from those acquired from wild animals exploited as food of the host (Cortés-Avizanda et al., 2016). Third, diet can have an indirect effect on parasite acquisition and infection intensity through the scavengers exposure to livestock pharmaceuticals which predispose opportunistic infections, especially broad-spectrum antibiotics disrupting normal flora and then allowing infection by bacterial and fungal pathogens (Keeney et al., 2014, Blanco, 2015, Blanco et al., 2017). These factors can also have variable impacts on host nutritional condition which can directly and indirectly influence the host's immunological state, pathogen acquisition, and overall health (Ardia and Schat, 2008, Becker et al., 2015, López-Rull et al., 2015). However, all these factors remain poorly understood in regards to their implications in the management and conservation of avian scavengers.

Coccidia and helminths are among the most common endoparasites in raptors. Both groups of parasites can cause malnutrition in their hosts because they provoke malabsorption, digestive problems and competition for resources. Often these parasites promote anaemia, weakness and are carriers for other parasites. In addition, immunosuppression due to infection by particular parasites may enhance host susceptibility to a concurrent infecting organism (Norris and Evans, 2000). These consequences are most common in young and debilitated individuals during stressful conditions (Friend and Franson, 1999, Lumeij et al., 2000, Klaphake and Clancy, 2005, Cooper, 2008). Infected animals spread helminths eggs and coccidian oocysts in faeces, so that other individuals can become infected when frequenting places where faeces accumulated due to stacked food and the habitual presence and overcrowding of foraging individuals (Wright and Gompper, 2005, Lebarbenchon et al., 2006, Becker et al., 2015). Helminths often occur in mixed infections involving several phyla (Sánchez-Andrade et al., 2002, Santoro et al., 2012) in combination with coccidian infections (Lumeij et al., 2000, Klaphake and Clancy, 2005, Cooper, 2008). Some coccidian species may cause disease (coccidiosis) producing diarrhoea and other detrimental effects that can lead to death in young of weak individuals. Other species can be transiently present without causing pathological effects due to the consumption of infected prey (Upton et al., 1990, Redig et al., 1993, Forbes and Fox, 2000).

In this study we investigated whether feeding habits associated with food availability and predictability at SFS were related to differences in the prevalence of endoparasites in a threatened generalist predator and facultative scavenger, the red kite Milvus milvus. Specifically, we compared diet and endoparasite prevalence and intensity in red kites foraging in areas with and without SFS. Previous studies have recorded through necropsy the presence of Capillaria sp. and other nematodes, as well as cestodes, trematodes and acanthocephalans in facultative and obligate scavenger species admitted in recovery centres (Sánchez-Andrade et al., 2002, Ferrer et al., 2004, Sanmartín et al., 2004, Santoro et al., 2010, Santoro et al., 2012), but little information is available for red kites (Krone, 2000, Sánchez-Andrade et al., 2002, Komorová et al., 2015), and no study cited the prevalence of coccidia in this species (see review by Duszynski et al. (1999)).

The red kite is listed as globally threatened because of steep population declines (BirdLife International, 2016), particularly in the Spanish breeding and wintering grounds (Viñuela et al., 1999, Mougeot et al., 2011). Despite these concerns, no study has evaluated the prevalence and intensity of parasitism and disease in this species or the environmental factors that can influence these traits in the wild. Previous studies have shown differences in diet composition of wintering populations, especially regarding the consumption of livestock carcasses depending on the farming and livestock residue elimination operations (Blanco, 2014a). The high predictability and abundance of food at SFS promote the repeated use of these places, a high abundance, density, and gregariousness of foraging red kites (Serrano, 1999, Viñuela et al., 1999, Contreras, 2001) and other scavenger species (Blanco, 1994, Blanco, 1996, Cortés-Avizanda et al., 2010). Deliberate feeding at SFS provides excellent opportunities to explore the consequences of overcrowding on parasite acquisition and transmission, as well as the related impact of food features (e.g. the content of pathogens and pharmaceuticals) and foraging grounds on infection and disease. Due to their effects on host aggregation and density (Arnsberg et al., 1998, McCallum et al., 2001), the predictability and concentration of food can exacerbate parasite infection (Lebarbenchon et al., 2006, Becker et al., 2015). This hypothesis predicts an increased kite exposure to endoparasite propagules from accumulated and concentrated faeces from overcrowded conspecifics and other scavengers foraging in the small specific locations of SFS (Cortés-Avizanda et al., 2010, Cortés-Avizanda et al., 2016) relative to those foraging alone or in small groups on prey randomly distributed within large areas (Heredia et al., 1991, Hiraldo et al., 1991, Viñuela et al., 1999). This is based on the fact that propagules of helminths and coccidia, as well as other disease agents, can remain viable for long periods in faeces and sludge while also fostering intermediate hosts and vectors (Anderson, 2000, World Health Organization, 2004, Botzler and Brown, 2014), thus contributing to increased host infection and re-infection in overcrowded conditions at SFS.

Section snippets

Study species and study areas

The red kite is a medium sized (~1 kg) raptor with a distribution range restricted to the Western Palearctic (Cramp and Simmons, 1980). The decline suffered by this species has been attributed to human persecution, especially through illegal poisoning, unintended rodenticide intoxication, habitat degradation and agricultural intensification, and the loss and highly regulated carcass dumping sites (Viñuela et al., 1999, Blanco and Montoya, 2004, Mougeot et al., 2011, see Table 1 for the

Diet and use of SFS

Red kites from the area with SFS mostly fed on carcasses from confined livestock, especially poultry and swine (Fig. 3), although about half of the pellets also contained remains of free-roaming livestock and wild prey, mostly voles and birds (Fig. 3). In contrast, in the area without SFS kites primarily fed almost exclusively on wild prey (Fig. 3), mostly on lagomorphs (wild rabbits, and Iberian hares, Lepus granatensis) and less frequently on other wild prey and carcass of free-ranging sheep.

Discussion

Our results show differences in the prevalence of helminths between red kites foraging on livestock carcass at SFS and those almost exclusively feeding on wild prey during winter. Contrasting farming systems between wintering areas lead to a clear difference in the availability of livestock carcass, especially from confined swine and poultry disposed at SFS aimed for the conservation of avian scavengers. This crucial difference strongly influences kite abundance and density, foraging habits,

Research and conservation recommendations

Shortcomings and threats of deliberate feeding require comprehensive understanding to critically evaluate potential paradoxical creation of ecological, evolutionary, epidemiological and contamination traps (Battin, 2004, Blanco, 2006, Kubasiewicz et al., 2016) leading to attractive sinks (Delibes et al., 2001) for the threatened species they are intended to favour. We encourage further research acknowledging the fruitful opportunities provided by SFS to experimentally study the ecological and

Acknowledgements

We thank J.L. González, Ó. Frías and P. Alcázar for their help with fieldwork. Funds were provided by the project CGL2010-15726 of Spanish Ministerio of Economía y Competitividad. M. López Lázaro, J. Bas and Fondo Amigos del Buitre (FAB) provided pictures. We acknowledge the efforts of four anonymous reviewers in improving the paper's content.

References (90)

  • M. Santoro et al.

    Helminth infestation in birds of prey (Accipitriformes and Falconiformes) in Southern Italy

    Vet. J.

    (2010)
  • A.A. Aguirre et al.

    Global factors driving emerging infectious diseases

    Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2008)
  • R.C. Anderson

    Nematode Parasite of Vertebrates: Their Development and Transmission

    (2000)
  • D.R. Ardia et al.

    Ecoimmunology

  • P. Arnsberg et al.

    Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communities

    Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.

    (1998)
  • J. Battin

    When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2004)
  • D.J. Becker et al.

    Linking anthropogenic resources to wildlife-pathogen dynamics: a review and meta-analysis

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2015)
  • BirdLife International, 2016. Species factsheet: Milvus milvus. Downloaded from 〈http://www.birdlife.org〉 on...
  • G. Blanco

    Seasonal abundance of black Kites associated with the rubbish dump of Madrid, Spain

    J. Raptor Res.

    (1994)
  • G. Blanco

    Population dynamics and communal roosting of white storks foraging at a Spanish refuse dump

    Colonial Waterbirds

    (1996)
  • G. Blanco

    Natural selection and the risks of artificial selection in the wild: nestling quality or quantity from supplementary feeding in the Spanish imperial eagle

    Ardeola

    (2006)
  • G. Blanco

    Can livestock carrion availability influence diet of wintering red Kites? Implications of sanitary policies in ecosystem services and conservation

    Popul. Ecol.

    (2014)
  • G. Blanco

    Influence of diet on the gastrointestinal flora of wintering red Kites

    Eur. J. Wildl. Res.

    (2014)
  • G. Blanco

    Multiresistant Salmonella serovar Typhimurium monophasic in wintering red kites Milvus milvus in Segovia, Central Spain

    J. Raptor Res.

    (2015)
  • Blanco, G., Montoya, R., 2004. Landscape, “muladares” or poisoning?: using GIS to assess factors related to the decline...
  • R.G. Botzler et al.

    Foundations of Wildlife Diseases

    (2014)
  • Cardiel, I., 2006. El Milano real en España. II censo nacional. SEO/BirdLife, Madrid (in Spanish with English...
  • T.A. Carter et al.

    Parasitic Diseases of Wild Birds

    (2008)
  • D.L. Clayton et al.

    Host-Parasite Evolution: General Principles and Avian Models

    (1997)
  • S. Cleaveland et al.

    The role of pathogens in biological conservation

  • Contreras, A., 2001. Impacto sobre la avifauna de la implantación del plan de gestión de los residuos sólidos urbanos...
  • A. Cortés-Avizanda et al.

    Supplementary feeding and endangered avian scavengers: benefits, caveats and controversies

    Front. Ecol. Environ.

    (2016)
  • J.O. Coulson et al.

    Gastrointestinal parasites of the swallow-tailed kite (Elanoides forficatus), including a report of lesions associated with the nematode Dispharynx sp.

    J. Raptor Res.

    (2010)
  • S. Cramp et al.
    (1980)
  • P. Daszak et al.

    Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife-threats to biodiversity and human health

    Science

    (2000)
  • M. Delibes et al.

    Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection

    Am. Nat.

    (2001)
  • Duszynski, D.W., Couch, L., 2013. The Biology and Identification of the Coccidia (apicomplexa) of Rabbits of the World....
  • Duszynski, D.W., Upton, S.J., Couch, L., 1999. The Coccidia of the World....
  • D. Ferrer et al.

    Helminths isolated from the digestive tract of diurnal raptors in Catalonia, Spain

    Vet. Rec.

    (2004)
  • J. Fischer et al.

    Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis

    Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.

    (2007)
  • Forbes, N.A., Fox, M.T., 2000. Control of endemic Caryospora species infestation of captive raptors. In: Proceedings of...
  • Friend, M., Franson, J.C., 1999. Field manual of wildlife diseases general field procedures and disease of...
  • M. Friend et al.

    Disease emergence in birds: challenges for the twenty-first century

    Auk

    (2001)
  • J.T. García et al.

    Geographic variation of the winter diet of the red kite Milvus milvus in the Iberian Peninsula

    Ibis

    (1998)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Enhancing monitoring and transboundary collaboration for conserving migratory species under global change: The priority case of the red kite

      2022, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although this attraction to supplemental food can buffer effects of poisoning on population viability, it can also increase other risks related to human-mediated food. Supplemental feeding may induce sanitary and toxicological problems when improperly managed (Blanco et al., 2017; Pitarch et al., 2017), and foraging in areas dominated by humans can pose additional risks such as collisions or electrocutions to energy and transport infrastructures (Hill et al., 2019a, b). Successful supplemental feeding of red kites depends on a tailored design for this species that accounts for the risks associated with this management practice (Oro et al., 2008; Orros and Fellowes, 2015) and reduces competition with larger scavenging species such as vultures (Cortes-Avizanda et al., 2016; Viñuela et al., 1999).

    • Livestock farming practices modulate vulture diet-disease interactions

      2019, Global Ecology and Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      The irregular ingestion in terms of frequency, “dosage” and drug cocktails from factory farms has been argued to alter the normal microbiota and immune systems of nestling vultures (Blanco et al., 2017a; Pitarch et al., 2017). These factors, coupled with the risk of pathogen acquisition from livestock (Blanco, 2018; Blanco and Díaz de Tuesta, 2018; Marin et al., 2018), and from increased intra-and interspecific transmission in the crowding and unsanitary conditions generally encountered in feeding stations (Blanco et al., 2017b), suggest an overall negative health impact on scavengers relying on carcasses from factory farms instead of wild animals and free-ranging livestock (Cortés-Avizanda et al., 2016). Paradoxically, few studies have evaluated the physiological and immunological effects of supplementary feeding on vultures, or the impact of particular diets based on wild animals and livestock from different farming systems on scavenger health (Blanco, 2006, 2014b).

    • Supplementary feeding stations for conservation of vultures could be an important source of monophasic Salmonella typhimurium 1,4,[5],12:i:-

      2018, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      This observation is in line with other studies, which have associated pig carcasses with avian scavenger contamination with veterinary pharmaceuticals and the creation of new resistances and the amplification of these acquired pathogens (Blanco et al., 2016, 2017a; Blanco, 2018). In addition, different studies have highlighted the potential impact of pig carcasses disposed in the SFSs on development of fungal and parasitic infections in wild avian scavengers (Blanco et al., 2017b, 2017c; Pitarch et al., 2017), although conceptually food security and food safety can potentially be better assured in the SFSs (Margalida et al., 2014). To circumvent this problem, in France conservationists, vets and stakeholders promoted the development of individual SFS, with the principle that each farmer directly recycles their carcasses at their own SFS, avoiding carcass displacement and limiting potential dissemination of pathogens, and furthermore providing carcasses spread more spatially for vultures, in a more natural way (Dupond et al., 2012).

    • Oral mycoses in avian scavengers exposed to antibiotics from livestock farming

      2017, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular, European vultures have increased their dependence on livestock carcasses from these feeding stations and farm surroundings over carcasses of free-ranging livestock (Cortés-Avizanda et al., 2016). These carcasses could pose health risks to avian scavengers due to ingestion of veterinary pharmaceuticals (Blanco et al., 2016, 2017a, 2017b), exposure to parasites (Blanco et al., 2017c) and microbial pathogens that may have developed multi-resistance mechanisms to these drugs (Blanco, 2015). This is mainly because carrion used for this purpose is generally from livestock from factory farming (such as poultry and swine) that are often sick, medicated just before death, and disposed of in feeding stations a short time afterwards without a withdrawal period or residue control (Blanco et al., 2016, 2017a; Cortés-Avizanda et al., 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text