Elsevier

Environmental Pollution

Volume 215, August 2016, Pages 195-202
Environmental Pollution

The washout effects of rainfall on atmospheric particulate pollution in two Chinese cities

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Relative effect is an approach that links washout effect to precipitation amount.

  • Particle size plays an important role in washout effect of rainfall.

  • The threshold is helpful in discriminating whether rainfall can improve air quality.

  • The lag period lengths determine the improvement of air quality following rain.

  • Restricted by relative effect, the washout effect to particles is limited.

Abstract

Though rainfall is recognized as one of the main mechanisms to reduce atmospheric particulate pollution, few studies have quantified this effect, particularly the corresponding lag effect and threshold. This study aimed to investigate the association between rainfall and air quality using a distributed lag non-linear model. Daily data on ambient PM2.5 and PM2.5–10 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm and from 2.5 to 10 μm) and meteorological factors were collected in Guangzhou and Xi'an from 2013 to 2014. A better washout effect was found for PM2.5–10 than for PM2.5, and the rainfall thresholds for both particle fractions were 7 mm in Guangzhou and 1 mm in Xi'an. The decrease in PM2.5 levels following rain lasted for 3 and 6 days in Guangzhou and Xi'an, respectively. Rainfall had a better washout effect in Xi'an compared with that in Guangzhou. Findings from this study contribute to a better understanding of the washout effects of rainfall on particulate pollution, which may help to understand the category and sustainability of dust-haze and enforce anthropogenic control measures in time.

Introduction

With increasing attention to dust-haze and related harmful health effects in China, air pollution has become a significant environmental concern for the public and policy makers (WHO, 2011, Rauhala, 2013, Xu et al., 2013). One of the major factors that causes dust-haze is atmospheric particles, especially PM2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm), which originates mainly from fuel combustion, construction dust and vehicle exhaust (Vingarzan and Li, 2006). The natural and anthropogenic processes for reducing atmospheric particle levels are important to improve air quality.

Rainfall is recognized as one of the main natural processes to improve air quality (Duhanyan and Roustan, 2011, Elperin et al., 2011), and it can greatly enhance the positive reductions achieved by anthropogenic control measures (Leung and Gustafson, 2005). Our previous study assessed the rainfall removal efficiency for total suspended particles (TSP) and found that artificial rain interventions may worsen air quality due to the lower removal of TSP without rainfall (Guo et al., 2014). However, there is limited information about the washout of particles and improvement in air quality following a single rain event and corresponding lag effects, as previous studies usually combined several rain events in one sample or focused on insufficient daily samples (Mattiot and Scafe, 1999, Encinas et al., 2004, He and Balasubramanian, 2009, Huang et al., 2009, Guo et al., 2014). Moreover, the results for analyzing washout of TSP are not applicable to a more narrowly defined specific size range of particle (e.g., PM2.5), as the washout effects are variable among different sizes of particles (Baklanov and Sørensen, 2001, Wang et al., 2010).

Numerous studies have conducted experimental and theoretical assessments on scavenging coefficients; a microphysical approximation of the particle washout effect by raindrops (Slinn, 1984, Flossmann et al., 1985, Volken and Schumann, 1993, Mircea et al., 2000, Andronache, 2003, Laakso et al., 2003, Loosmore and Cederwall, 2004, Bae et al., 2006, Feng, 2007, Wang et al., 2010, Quérel et al., 2014a, Quérel et al., 2014b, Wang et al., 2014). However, due to the complex collection of microphysical parameters (e.g., raindrop diameter, particle diameter, collision efficiency between raindrop and atmospheric particles, etc.) and huge computing resources required (Mircea et al., 2000, Bae et al., 2006, Wang et al., 2010), the scavenging coefficient is not easy to calculate, and therefore not suitable to evaluate air quality directly. Instead of linking air quality to scavenging coefficient, an approach is needed that links it to observable meteorological parameters such as rainfall conditions (Quérel et al., 2014b). Also, focusing on observable parameters may allow a more direct evaluation of the change in air quality following rain. For example, rainfall may worsen air quality following low amounts of precipitation (Levin and Cotton, 2008, Feng and Wang, 2012, Yuan, 2014) and identifying the critical threshold which corresponds to precipitation amount may help to discriminate and forecast changes in air quality.

In view of this knowledge gap, we assessed the removal effects of rainfall by collecting daily PM2.5 and PM2.5–10 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter between 2.5 and 10 μm) concentrations and meteorological factors (wind speed and precipitation) in Guangzhou and Xi'an during 2013 and 2014. This study aims to provide a quantitative description of the rainfall washout effect using a new approach, which can enhance the knowledge for evaluating particulate pollution, and hence assist in implementing efficient control measures to cope with worsening air quality.

Section snippets

Study setting and data collection

Two cities were selected to explore rainfall washout effects on particles. One is Guangzhou, a coastal city in South China with high amounts of precipitation, e.g., annual average precipitation of 2200 mm in 2014 (http://cdc.nmic.cn/home.do). The other is Xi'an, an inland city in Northwest China with low amounts of precipitation, e.g., annual average precipitation of 660 mm in 2014 (http://cdc.nmic.cn/home.do). The two cities have a similar annual wind speed (2.3 ± 0.97 km h−1 for Guangzhou and

Results

Average daily concentrations of PM2.5 and PM2.5–10 in Guangzhou were relatively lower than those in Xi'an. In Guangzhou, concentrations of PM2.5 and PM2.5–10 were 50 ± 26 μg m−3 (range: 9.3–160 μg m−3) and 21 ± 9.9 μg m−3 (range: 0.53–66 μg m−3), respectively (Table 1). In Xi'an, the concentrations of PM2.5 and PM2.5–10 were 89 ± 77 μg m−3 (range: 9.6–900 μg m−3) and 75 ± 56 μg m−3 (range: 4.1–640 μg m−3), respectively (Table 1). The daily average rainfall was 6.0 ± 15 mm in Guangzhou and

Discussion

We observed different relative effects on particulate concentration with different particle sizes, namely PM2.5 and PM2.5–10, suggesting that the washout effect of rainfall on particle is dependent on particle size, with greater effects for the coarser particle fraction. Similar conclusions were made in previous studies that used a microphysical approach, i.e., theoretical and experimental research on scavenging coefficients (Slinn, 1984, Flossmann et al., 1985, Volken and Schumann, 1993,

Conclusions

We calculated the relative effect of rainfall on atmospheric particle concentrations; an approach which directly describes the decreases in atmospheric particle levels using a precipitation amount. Given the theory relating to scavenging coefficients and the differing characteristics for each of the two city study locations described here, it can be deducted that the relative effect of particle washout was influenced by particle size and raindrop size. The existence of a rainfall threshold

Acknowledgements

The present study was financially supported by the public welfare research program of National Health and Family Planning Commission of China (No. 201402022) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M572282).

References (49)

  • D.-Y. Huang et al.

    Distribution and deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in precipitation in Guangzhou, South China

    J. Environ. Sci.

    (2009)
  • L. Laakso et al.

    Ultrafine particle scavenging coefficients calculated from 6 years field measurements

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2003)
  • S. Lai et al.

    Characterization of PM2.5 and the major chemical components during a 1-year campaign in rural Guangzhou, Southern China

    Atmos. Res.

    (2016)
  • G.A. Loosmore et al.

    Precipitation scavenging of atmospheric aerosols for emergency response applications: testing an updated model with new real-time data

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2004)
  • M. Mircea et al.

    Precipitation scavenging coefficient: influence of measured aerosol and raindrop size distributions

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2000)
  • A. Quérel et al.

    The importance of new collection efficiency values including the effect of rear capture for the below-cloud scavenging of aerosol particles

    Atmos. Res.

    (2014)
  • P.E. Saide et al.

    Forecasting urban PM10 and PM2.5 pollution episodes in very stable nocturnal conditions and complex terrain using WRF-Chem CO tracer model

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2011)
  • Y. Song et al.

    The forecasting research of early warning systems for atmospheric pollutants: a case in Yangtze River Delta region

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2015)
  • R. Vingarzan et al.

    The Pacific 2001 air quality study - synthesis of findings and policy implications

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2006)
  • W. Wu et al.

    Temperature–mortality relationship in four subtropical Chinese cities: a time-series study using a distributed lag non-linear model

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2013)
  • H. Xu et al.

    Inter-annual variability of wintertime PM2.5 chemical composition in Xi'an, China: evidences of changing source emissions

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • P. Xu et al.

    Haze, air pollution, and health in China

    The Lancet

    (2013)
  • K. Zhang et al.

    Diurnal and seasonal variability in size-dependent atmospheric deposition fluxes of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an urban center

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2012)
  • C. Andronache

    Estimated variability of below-cloud aerosol removal by rainfall for observed aerosol size distributions

    Atmos. Chem. Phys.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    This paper has been recommended for acceptance by Hageman Kimberly Jill.

    View full text