ViewpointIs there any real chance for carbon capture to be beneficial to the environment?
Highlights
► Role of carbon dioxide emission is still controversial. ► Atmospheric carbon capture has no present interest. ► Carbon capture at the source may be interesting. ► Carbon capture and recycle has better perspectives than carbon capture and storage.
Section snippets
To the Editor
Apart from the still open debate how relevant are the regulated anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions to the behaviour of our climate, some of the proposed mitigation strategies actually translate in much worse consequences for the economy and the environment including the anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions that just doing nothing. Anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions are higher than ever and further emissions increase seems inevitable with the increasing population and energy needs. The
References (5)
- Gazzino, M., Benelli, G., 2008. Pressurised oxy-coal combustion Rankine-cycle for future zero emission power plants:...
- Gazzino, M., Riccio, G., Rossi, N., Benelli, G., 2009. Pressurised oxy-coal combustion Rankine-cycle for future zero...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (4)
Carbon dioxide hydrogenation for sustainable energy storage
2024, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyTechnological optimism in climate mitigation: The case of carbon capture and storage
2018, Oxford Handbook of Energy and SocietyCarbon capture and storage: A controversial climate mitigation approach
2015, International SpectatorTime to stop investing in carbon capture and storage and reduce government subsidies of fossil-fuels
2014, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.