Elsevier

Engineering Structures

Volume 56, November 2013, Pages 194-206
Engineering Structures

Analysis of flexure-shear behavior of UHPFRC beams based on stress field approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.04.024Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Modified Compression Field Theory has been adapted for UHPFRC beams.

  • Only “stress–strain” relationships obtained from characterization tests are needed.

  • The model has been checked with respect to complete data of experimental programs.

  • The predictions of the model agree well with the experimental behavior of beams.

  • The evolution of the struts inclination when the load increases is well evaluated.

Abstract

An adaptation of the Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT) to grasp the flexure-shear behavior of prestressed or reinforced beams made of Ultra High Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) is presented. The UHPFRC mechanical behavior is captured using only “stress–strain” relationships obtained from characterization tests and modified with correction factors derived from literature. The model has been checked with respect to complete data of two experimental programs. The predictions of the model agree rather well with the experimental results with an efficient evaluation of the reorientation of the compressive struts with increasing load. The condition for a synergetic contribution to the shear capacity of transversal reinforcement up to their yield strength and UHPFRC is also discussed.

Introduction

The Ultra High Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) behavior under tension is a fundamental constitutive property that modifies the use of conventional reinforcement [1]. In addition the structural applications often associate UHPFRC with pretension all the more that the compressive strength of these materials is quite high. Thus the UHPFRC behavior under tension is often critical, not or not only for bending verification but also for shear design where only UHPFRC carry tensile forces. Thus the behavior of beams made of UHPFRC under shear loading is particularly relevant to illustrate this situation. As an example, shear justification critically determined the web thickness of ITE® beams in Pinel Bridge [2].

For conventional reinforced concrete, at the end of the 19th and at the beginning of the 20th century, Ritter [3] and Mörsch [4] used the equilibrium equations to develop the first truss model in order to determine the ultimate shear strength of reinforced concrete beams. From that time, many researchers have developed truss models capable of predicting not only the ultimate shear strength of reinforced and/or prestressed concrete structures but also their global behavior (“Load–Deflection” curve for example) under shear loading. Several of such models are based on an evaluation of the stress field [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. The Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT) [5], [6], [7], [8] is the most commonly used. In particular, it forms the basis for shear design in the Canadian code [17] and in the Final Draft of fib Model Code 2010 [18], [19], [20].

In the present paper, the results of a study examining the feasibility of applying an adaptation of the MCFT for the rational assessment of shear behavior in reinforced and prestressed UHPFRC beams are presented. The proposed adaptation of MCFT to UHPFRC has first been checked with respect to complete data of an experimental program realized at IFSTTAR [21], [22], [23] and defined to analyse the shear behavior of reinforced and prestressed beams made of UHPFRC taking into account the actual orientation of fibers. Then the model has been verified against data from an experimental campaign carried out by Sato et al. [24] intending in particular to check the additivity of fiber and transverse reinforcement contributions for reinforced UHPFRC beams with or without stirrups.

Section snippets

Adopted approach

The approach presented herein is based on MCFT. The fibers participation is integrated in the UHPFRC contribution. The UHPFRC is considered as developing multiple fine-cracking under tension. Thus a “stress–strain” approach can be appropriate, in particular for the UHPFRC tensile behavior [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. Concerning UHPFRC mechanical behavior, the proposed approach needs only “stress–strain” relationships obtained from characterization tests and modified with correction factors

Calculation procedure

The beam cross section is discretized in many horizontal layers.

Description of the experimental program and input data

An experimental program has been realized at IFSTTAR in order to analyse the shear behavior of reinforced and prestressed beams made of UHPFRC taking into account the actual orientation of fibers [21], [22], [37]. Specimens were fabricated in a precast factory (Veldhoven, the Netherlands) in industrial conditions, using two UHPFRC mixes [A-A(2) and B] presented in Table 1. Specimens made of mix A were cast in two steps, noted A and A(2). The main parameters studied in this experimental program

Conclusions

The results of a study examining the feasibility of applying an adaptation of the MCFT for the rational assessment of shear behavior of reinforced and/or prestressed UHPFRC beams, have been presented. The fibers participation is integrated in the UHPFRC contribution. The UHPFRC is considered as developing multiple fine-cracking under tension. Thus a “stress–strain” approach can be adopted for the UHPFRC tensile behavior. For this latter, the proposed approach needs only “stress–strain”

References (40)

  • J. Xia et al.

    Shear failure analysis on ultra-high performance concrete beams reinforced with high strength steel

    Eng Struct

    (2011)
  • Ultra high performance fibre-reinforced concretes—interim recommendations. Paris (France): Association Française de...
  • S. Chanut et al.

    Un cinquième pont routier français en BFUP: le triplement du pont Pinel à Rouen

    Bulletin Ouvrages d’Art du Sétra

    (2007)
  • Ritter.W. Die et al.

    Schweizerische Bauzeitung

    (1899)
  • Mörsch E. Der Eisenbetonbau. In: Konrad Wittwer, editor. Seine Theorie und Anwendung. Stuttgart;...
  • F. Vecchio et al.

    The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear

    ACI Struct J

    (1986)
  • M.P. Collins et al.

    Prestressed concrete structures

    (1991)
  • H. Nakamura et al.

    Evaluation of shear strength of RC beam section based on extended modified compression field theory

    JSCE Conc Libr

    (1995)
  • M.S. Kachi et al.

    L’effort tranchant dans la modélisation du comportement jusqu’à la rupture des poutres en béton armé et précontraint

    Revue européenne de Génie Civil

    (2006)
  • T.T.C. Hsu

    Unified theory of reinforced concrete

    (1993)
  • A. Belarbi et al.

    Constitutive laws of concrete in tension and reinforcing bars stiffened by concrete

    ACI Struct J

    (1994)
  • A. Belarbi et al.

    Constitutive laws of softened concrete in biaxial tension compression

    ACI Struct J

    (1995)
  • X.-B D. Pang et al.

    Behavior of reinforced concrete membrane elements in shear

    ACI Struct J

    (1995)
  • A. Muttoni

    Shear and punching strength of slabs without shear reinforcement (in German: Schubfestigkeit und Durchstanzen von Platten ohne Querkraftbewehrung)

    Beton und Stahlbetonbau

    (2003)
  • A. Muttoni et al.

    Shear strength of members without transverse reinforcement as function of critical shear crack width

    ACI Struct J

    (2008)
  • Sigrist V, Hackbarth B. Stress field analysis of structural concrete beams. In: Proceedings of 3rd fib international...
  • V. Sigrist

    Generalized stress field approach for analysis of beams in shear

    ACI Struct J

    (2011)
  • CAN/CSA Standard A23.3-04. Design of concrete structures. Mississauga, ON (Canada): Canadian Standards Association. p....
  • E.C. Bentz et al.

    The simplified MCFT for calculating the shear strength of reinforced concrete elements

    ACI Struct J

    (2006)
  • fédération internationale du béton (fib). Model Code 2010 – Final draft. fib. Bulletin...
  • Cited by (28)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text