Elsevier

Energy Conversion and Management

Volume 148, 15 September 2017, Pages 360-377
Energy Conversion and Management

Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a combined supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton/absorption refrigeration cycle

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.042Get rights and content

Highlights

  • An exergoeconomic analysis is performed for the SCRB/ARC cycle.

  • Parametric analysis is performed to study the performance of the SCRB/ARC.

  • Performances of the SCRB/ARC and SCRBC are presented and compared.

  • The SCRB/ARC has better performances in comparison with the SCRBC.

Abstract

Exergoeconomic analysis is performed for a novel combined SCRB/ARC (supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton/absorption refrigeration cycle) in which the waste heat from the SCRBC is recovered by an ARC for producing cooling. Parametric analysis is conducted to investigate the effects of the decision variables on the performance of the SCRB/ARC cycle. The performances of the SCRB/ARC and SCRBC cycles are optimized and compared from the viewpoints of first law, second law and exergoeconomics. It is concluded that combining the SCRBC with an ARC can not only enhance the first and second law efficiencies of the SCRBC, but also improve the exergoeconomic performance. The results show that the largest exergy destruction rate occurs in the reactor, while the components in the ARC have less exergy destruction. The reactor and turbine are the first and second important components from exergoeconomic aspects. When optimization is based on the exergoeconomics, the first and second law efficiencies and the total product unit cost of SCRB/ARC are 26.12% higher, 2.73% higher and 2.03% lower than those of the SCRBC. The optimization study also reveals that an increase in the reactor outlet temperature can enhance both thermodynamic and exergoeconomic performances of the SCRB/ARC. For the basic design case, the SCRB/ARC can produce 71.76 MW of the cooling capacity and 6.57 MW of the cooling exergy at the expense of only 0.36 MW of power in comparison with the SCRBC.

Introduction

Many efforts have been devoted to the high efficiency and the cost reduction of electricity generated by the nuclear power plants toward the successful future utilization of the nuclear power [1]. In recent years, the Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR) [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and the supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle (SCRBC) [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] have become the advanced technologies in utilizing the nuclear energy. Compared with the GT-MHR, the SCRBC has a reasonable efficiency of 45.3% at a lower reactor outlet temperature of 550 °C, while the GT-MHR obtains a comparable efficiency at a significantly higher reactor outlet temperature of 850 °C [8]. The SCRBC proves to be a more promising approach of the energy utilization for the future power plants because of its compactness, simplicity, better economic aspect and higher efficiency. For the SCRBC, the compressor work can be significantly reduced by using the drastic changes of the CO2 properties near the critical point, leading to a significant increase in the efficiency. It is known that the working fluid should be cooled to some temperature before the compression process. For the SCRBC, CO2 is usually cooled to about 32 °C near its critical temperature (31.1 °C), which leads to a reasonable low-grade thermal energy (about 50% of the input energy) rejected to the pre-cooler [11], [12]. Therefore the performance of the SCRBC can be improved by reutilizing the low-grade thermal energy in the pre-cooler through various waste heat recovery systems.

Much attention has been focused on the utilization of the waste heat from the SCRBC by using the organic Rankine cycles (ORCs). Besarati and Goswami [13] implemented a thermodynamic analysis and comparison of three different SCB/ORC (sunpercritical CO2 Brayton/organic Rankine cycle) cycles. The results presented that the largest efficiency increment was obtained by adopting a simple SCBC (supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle) configuration as the topping cycle. However, the maximum efficiency of the overall system was achieved by the SCRB/ORC (supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle) cycle. Akbari and Mahmoudi [14] investigated a combined SCRB/ORC by using the exergy and exergoeconomic analyses. They concluded that the exergy efficiency of SCRB/ORC was higher than that of the SCRBC by up to 11.7% and that the total product unit cost of SCRB/ORC was lower than that of the SCRBC by up to 5.7%. Wang et al. [15] conducted a comparative study between the SCRB/ORC and SCRB/CDTPC (supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton/CO2 transcritical power cycle) considering the exergy and exergoeconomics. The results showed that the second law efficiency of the SCRB/CDTPC cycle was comparable with that of the SCRB/ORC cycle. Meanwhile, the total product unit cost of the SCRB/CDTPC was slightly higher than that of the SCRB/ORC. Sánchez et al. [16] studied the performance of SCB/ORC with different pure organic fluids and hydrocarbon mixtures as working fluids in the bottoming ORC cycles. The results indicated that the overall efficiency of the SCB/ORC was 7% higher than that of the simple SCBC when the hydrocarbon mixtures were utilized in the bottoming ORC. Zhang et al. [17] simulated and analyzed a SCRBC combined with an ORC with liquefied natural gas as heat sink. They found that the overall thermal efficiency of the SCRB/ORC could be up to 52.12% under the operating conditions of 20 MPa, 800 K and part-flow ratio 6.8.

A number of studies have also been published on the utilization of the waste heat from the SCRBC by employing a CO2 transcritical power cycle (CDTPC). Yari and Sirousazar [18] investigated the performance of the combined SCRB/CDTPC cycle. They found that the second law efficiency of the SCRB/CDTPC was 5.5–26% higher than that of the single SCRBC. Wang et al. [19] conducted a thermo-economic analysis on the performance of the SCRBC combined with a CDTPC. The results showed that the capital cost per net power output was 6% higher than that of the single SCRBC. Wang et al. [20] also carried out the thermodynamic comparison and optimization of two different configurations of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles with a bottoming CDTPC. They concluded that the thermal efficiencies of the recompression and simple configurations of the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles could be increased by 10.12% and 19.34%, respectively by adding a CDTPC. Wu et al. [21] performed a detailed analysis on a cooling and power system combining SCRBC with a CDTPC using liquefied natural gas (LNG) as the heat sink. The results revealed that the thermal efficiency of the SCRB/CDTPC could be achieved as high as 54.47% using LNG as heat sink.

Some investigations have also been performed on the recovery of the waste heat from the SCRBC by adopting a Kalina cycle. Li et al. [22] conducted an exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a SCRBC coupled with a Kalina cycle. They reported that the total product unit cost and the exergy efficiency of the SCRB/KC (supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton/Kalina cycle) were 5.5% lower and 8.02% higher than those of the SCRBC cycle. Mahmoudi et al. [23] also investigated a combined SCRB/KC from the viewpoints of exergy and exergoeconomics. They found that the minimum total product unit cost and the maximum exergy efficiency of the SCRB/KC were 4.9% lower and 10% higher than those of the SCRBC cycle. However, little attention has been devoted to the waste heat recovery from the SCRBC by utilizing an absorption refrigeration cycle (ARC). Currently the ammonia-water and lithium bromide-water are the conventional working fluids in the ARC. The refrigerants of the ammonia-water and lithium bromide-water are ammonia and water, respectively. The advantage for the ammonia is that it can evaporate at a lower temperature and in a wider temperature range than water. Meanwhile, the ARC utilizing the ammonia-water as the working pair can be driven by the heat source generally at 50–200 °C [24], which is wider than that of the heat source driving the ARC utilizing lithium bromide-water. Therefore the ammonia-water was selected as the working pair in the ARC. Furthermore, the SCRB/ARC (supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton/absorption refrigeration cycle) can provide power and cooling, while the SCRBC can provide only power.

This paper focuses on the energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of the SCRB/ARC cycle. Firstly, the combined SCRB/ARC is investigated in terms of the energy and exergy compared with the single SCRBC under a basic design case. Then, the parametric analysis is performed to investigate the effects of the key decision variables on the thermodynamic and exergoeconomic performances of the combined SCRB/ARC cycle. Finally, the both the SCRB/ARC and single SCRBC are optimized using the genetic algorithm (GA) from the viewpoints of the energy, exergy and exergoeconomics and then the results are compared. These findings may help to extend the utilization of the waste heat from the SCRBC for the nuclear power plants and enhance the performance of the SCRBC.

Section snippets

System description and assumptions

Fig. 1 exhibits the configuration of the proposed SCRB/ARC (supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton/absorption refrigeration cycle) and a T-s diagram of SCRBC (supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle). The proposed cycle is a combination of the SCRBC and the ARC (absorption refrigeration cycle) so that the heat rejected in the pre-cooler of the SCRBC can be utilized to drive the ARC to provide cooling for the nuclear power plants or for other purpose. The CO2 leaving from the reactor

Thermodynamic analysis

The combined SCRB/ARC cycle was developed on the basis of the conservations of the mass, energy as well as exergy balance of individual components [11], [12], [26]. In this paper, MATLAB and REFPROP9.1 [29] are combined through an interface to simulate the cycle performance based on the mass, energy and exergy balance equations as well as the thermodynamic property relations. Moreover, all the physical and thermodynamic properties of the fluids involved in the present work are evaluated by

Results and discussion

In this section, parametric study was conducted to investigate the effects of the decision variables (four variables for the proposed SCRB/ARC cycle) on the values of the objectives: the energy utilization factor (EUF), exergy efficiency (ηex) and the total product unit cost (cP,tot). The decision variables are the compressor pressure ratio (PRc), heat-end temperature difference in the generator (ΔTgen,hot), cold-end temperature difference in the generator (ΔTgen,cold), temperature in the

Conclusions

In the present paper, the authors have proposed a novel combined SCRB/ARC (supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton/absorption refrigeration cycle) cycle in which the waste heat from the SCRBC is utilized by an ARC for generating cooling. Detailed thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses and optimization have been performed for the SCRB/ARC cycle. Parametric analysis has also been carried out to investigate the effects of the key thermodynamic parameters on the thermodynamic and exergoeconomic

References (47)

  • M. Kanoglu et al.

    Performance assessment of cogeneration plants

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2009)
  • S.F. Mussati et al.

    NLP modeling for the optimization of LiBr-H2O absorption refrigeration systems with exergy loss rate, heat transfer area, and cost as single objective functions

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2016)
  • F. Mohammadkhani et al.

    Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles

    Energy

    (2014)
  • M. Khaljani et al.

    Comprehensive analysis of energy, exergy and exergo-economic of cogeneration of heat and power in a combined gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2015)
  • L.S. Vieira et al.

    Exergoeconomic improvement of a complex cogeneration system integrated with a professional process simulator

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2009)
  • V. Zare et al.

    An exergoeconomic investigation of waste heat recovery from the Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR) employing an ammonia–water power/cooling cycle

    Energy

    (2013)
  • R.D. Misra et al.

    Thermoeconomic evaluation and optimization of a double-effect H2O/LiBr vapour-absorption refrigeration system

    Int J Refrig

    (2005)
  • A.T. Bulgan

    Optimization of the thermodynamic model of aqua-ammonia absorption refrigeration systems

    Energy Convers Manage

    (1995)
  • C. Wu et al.

    Thermodynamic analysis and parametric optimization of CDTPC-ARC based on cascade use of waste heat of heavy-duty internal combustion engines (ICEs)

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2016)
  • B.H. Gebreslassie et al.

    Design of environmentally conscious absorption cooling systems via multi-objective optimization and life cycle assessment

    Appl Energy

    (2009)
  • D. Alberstein

    Weapons Grade Plutonium Destruction In The Gas Turbine Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR)

    (1997)
  • Alberstein D, Neylan AJ. Plutonium disposition in the gas turbine modular helium reactor (GT-MHR);...
  • Quinn EL, Shenoy A. Instrumentation and control design for the Gas Turbine Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR);...
  • Cited by (169)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text