doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.002
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd All rights reserved.
The evaluation of breast tissues removed during reductive mammaplasty with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Antonino De Lorenzoa, Gianpiero Gravantea, b,
,
, Roberto Sorgec, Fabio Nicolid, Riccardo Carusod, Antonino Aracod, Michele Servidioa, Augusto Orlandie and Valerio Cervellid
aDivision of Human Nutrition, University of Tor Vergata in Rome, Italy
bDepartment of Surgery, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, United Kingdom
cLaboratory of Biometry, University of Tor Vergata in Rome, Italy
dDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Tor Vergata in Rome, Italy
eDepartment of Biopathology, Anatomic Pathology Institute, University of Tor Vergata in Rome, Italy
Received 27 October 2007;
revised 2 February 2008;
accepted 4 February 2008.
Available online 18 March 2008.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
Purpose
We conducted a case-control study in which patients were evaluated with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) before and after breast reduction surgery, and results were correlated with the histological examination. Our goal was to confirm the DEXA as a precise technique for the measurement of breast composition, in order to propose it for the preoperative evaluation of plastic surgery patients.
Materials and methods
We prospectively recruited all women that underwent reduction mammaplasty and excluded patients with contraindications to the operation or those that previously underwent bariatric surgery to reduce their weight. Patients were evaluated with DEXA 1 week before and after surgery.
Results
From February to October 2006 we recruited 25 patients. The statistical analysis found a significant reduction of weight, BMI, regional fat free mass and fat mass after the operation. The comparison between DEXA and the histological analysis produced a correlation r = 0.989 (r2 = 0.978), with a predictivity of 98% and a percentage of error 8.3% (95% confidence intervals −252.6, 273.7; 95% limits of agreements of Bland and Altman −436.0, 457.1). Similar results were obtained with the analysis of fat.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrated that conventional segmental DEXA is a very precise technique to measure the amount of tissue removed in breast reductions and could open future application in the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing such operations.
Keywords: Mammary reduction; Body composition; Fat and lean mass; DEXA
Fig. 1. DEXA regional evaluation (box) of a 30-year-old patient.
Fig. 2. Upper panel, scatter plot of tissue measured with DEXA and analysed with histology. Identity line (red) and regression line (black). Lower panel, Bland and Altman plot with 95% confidence intervals (black lines) and limits of agreements (red lines) of differences between histologic values and DEXA measurements.
Fig. 3. Upper panel, scatter plot of fat measured with DEXA (FM) and analysed with histology. Identity line (red) and regression line (black). Lower panel, Bland and Altman plot with 95% confidence intervals (black lines) and limits of agreements (red lines) of differences between histologic values and DEXA measurements.
Table 1.
Demographic and anthropometric characteristics

Table 2.
Preoperative/postoperative results obtained with DEXA for regional and breast tissues

All data were examined with the Student's t-test.
Table 3.
Results obtained with the histologic analysis

Table 4.
Correlation between the DEXA analysis of tissues and the histomorphometric examination
a Histological FM and FFM derived from the percentage of fat and total tissue removed.
|
Note to users: The section "Articles in Press" contains peer reviewed accepted articles to be published in this journal. When the final article is assigned to an issue of the journal, the "Article in Press" version will be removed from this section and will appear in the associated published journal issue. The date it was first made available online will be carried over. Please be aware that although "Articles in Press" do not have all bibliographic details available yet, they can already be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI as follows: Author(s), Article Title, Journal (Year), DOI. Please consult the journal's reference style for the exact appearance of these elements, abbreviation of journal names and the use of punctuation.
|
| There are three types of "Articles in Press": |
- Accepted manuscripts: these are articles that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by the Editorial Board. The articles have not yet been copy edited and/or formatted in the journal house style.
- Uncorrected proofs: these are copy edited and formatted articles that are not yet finalized and that will be corrected by the authors. Therefore the text could change before final publication.
- Corrected proofs: these are articles containing the authors' corrections and may, or may not yet have specific issue and page numbers assigned.
|