Research paper
Graft copolymers of ethyl methacrylate on waxy maize starch derivatives as novel excipients for matrix tablets: Drug release and fronts movement kinetics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.12.005Get rights and content

Abstract

A previous paper [1] deals with the physicochemical and technological characterization of novel graft copolymers of ethyl methacrylate (EMA) on waxy maize starch (MS) and hydroxypropylstarch (MHS). The results obtained suggested the potential application of these copolymers as excipients for compressed non-disintegrating matrix tablets. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the mechanism governing drug release from matrix systems prepared with the new copolymers and anhydrous theophylline or diltiazem HCl as model drugs with different solubility. The influence of the carbohydrate nature, drying procedure and initial pore network on drug release kinetics was also evaluated. Drug release experiments were performed from free tablets. Radial drug release and fronts movement kinetics were also analysed, and several mathematical models were employed to ascertain the drug release mechanisms. The drug release markedly depends on the drug solubility and the carbohydrate nature but is practically not affected by the drying process and the initial matrix porosity. A faster drug release is observed for matrices containing diltiazem HCl compared with those containing anhydrous theophylline, in accordance with the higher drug solubility and the higher friability of diltiazem matrices. In fact, although diffusion is the prevailing drug release mechanism for all matrices, the erosion mechanism seems to have some contribution in several formulations containing diltiazem. A reduction in the surface exposed to the dissolution medium (radial release studies) leads to a decrease in the drug release rate, but the release mechanism is not essentially modified. The nearly constant erosion front movement confirms the behaviour of these systems as inert matrices where the drugs are released mainly by diffusion through the porous structure.

Graphical abstract

The graphs show the drug release and fronts movement profiles for matrices prepared with freeze-dried (FD) graft copolymers of ethyl methacrylate (EMA) and waxy maize starch (MS) or hydroxypropylstarch (MHS), using as model drugs anhydrous theophylline (T) or diltiazem HCl (D). The drug release markedly depends on the drug solubility and the carbohydrate nature, decreasing with the reduction in the surface exposed to the dissolution medium (radial release studies). The fronts movement kinetic reveals a faster water uptake for the most hydrophilic copolymer (MHS derivative) and a nearly constant erosion movement typical of inert matrices.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (114KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Among the different approaches experimented for obtaining sustained-release delivery systems, matrix tablets, particularly if obtained by direct compression, still appear as one of the most efficient and interesting from both the economic and the process development points of view [2].

A variety of polymers is employed as matrix-forming excipients whose nature and characteristics may play an important role and significantly influence the behaviour of these devices. The controlling effect of a polymer material on drug release depends on its physicochemical properties and the way it is mixed during the manufacture of the system. To be more specific, the effect is due to the polymer molecular properties, such as the nature of the monomer, type and degree of substitution and whether the polymer is mixed dry or dissolved [3], [4].

Three main types of polymers may be used as drug delivery modulators: natural, synthetic and semi-synthetic. Among semi-synthetic polymers, modified starches have been proposed as direct compression excipients for controlled release matrices [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. For instance, substituted amylose leads to hydrophilic matrix systems resistant to biodegradation [10] whereas starch acetate and graft copolymers with vinyl monomers yield hydrophobic matrices [8], [11]. Therefore, native starch properties are substantially modified, and the mechanism involved on drug release differs depending on the type of polymer used.

In a previous work [1], a novel generation of copolymers combining waxy maize starch (amylose content < 1%) derivatives (MS, MHS) and ethyl methacrylate (EMA) were synthesised by free-radical polymerization and alternatively dried by vacuum oven (OD) or freeze-drying (FD) techniques. The physicochemical and technological properties of these materials were thoroughly evaluated and their performance compared with the raw starches. The grafting of EMA on the carbohydrates backbone introduced hydrophobicity and leaded to amorphization and changes in particle size and morphology that affected the densification behaviour of the original carbohydrates. Graft copolymerization also improved the compactibility and mechanical resistance of native starches, suggesting the potential value of these copolymers as excipients for compressed non-disintegrating matrix tablets.

In addition to the polymer nature, drug properties such as polymorphism, degree of crystallinity, particle size, solubility and amount in the pharmaceutical dosage form can influence the release kinetic [12]. From all these variables, the solubility characteristics of the active are particularly important when designing extended-release dosage forms, as they can strongly influence the overall release profile. In fact, an excessively high or an extremely low solubility may give rise to formulation problems. Indeed, it is widely accepted that for both inert and swellable systems, diffusion, preceded by dissolution, may represent the key parameter for controlling drug release [13]. Thus, in the present study, two model drugs were selected, anhydrous theophylline and diltiazem HCl, because both are suitable candidates for controlled release formulations [2], [14] and have different solubility.

For the above reasons, the aim of this work was to identify the mechanism governing drug release from matrix systems prepared with the novel copolymers of ethyl methacrylate and waxy maize starch derivatives, using as model drugs anhydrous theophylline (a slightly water soluble drug) and diltiazem hydrochloride (a freely water soluble drug). Attention has also been focused on the influence of the carbohydrate nature, drying process and matrix porosity on the mechanistic aspects of drug release from the tested matrices.

Section snippets

Materials

Copolymers synthesised by free radical copolymerization of ethyl methacrylate (EMA) and waxy maize starch (MS) or waxy maize hydroxypropylstarch (MHS) were selected for the study. The preparation of the grafted copolymers has been described in detail by Marinich et al. [1]. The products obtained (waxy maize starch–ethyl metacrylate – MSEMA and waxy maize hydroxypropylstarch–ethyl methacrylate – MHSEMA) were dried either in a vacuum oven (OD copolymers) or freeze dried (FD copolymers). The

Preparation of tablets

Although a thorough study on compression characteristics of the copolymers has been reported in a previous paper [1], it is known that the addition of drug and lubricant to direct compression tablet matrices could produce substantial changes in compaction profiles [8], [24], [25]. For this reason, some compression parameters [26], [27] obtained from the different mixtures are summarised in Table 1.

Concerning the influence of the carbohydrate nature, the applied pressure (P) required to obtain

Conclusions

The present study signifies the potential of the novel graft copolymers as directly compressible tabletting excipients for sustained release purposes. The grafting of EMA introduces hydrophobicity and steric bulkiness that considerably protect the starch and prolong drug release. This behaviour is more noticeable when a slightly water soluble drug is included in the formulation. If a freely water soluble drug is selected, the combination with MSEMA derivatives (more hydrophobic than MHSEMA

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a F.P.I. grant from Spanish Government and was part of a project (MAT2004-01599) from Spanish Ministry of Education and Science.

References (37)

Cited by (15)

  • Dynamic structure model of polyelectrolyte complex based controlled-release matrix tablets visualized by synchrotron radiation micro-computed tomography

    2020, Materials Science and Engineering C
    Citation Excerpt :

    As a result of the counter-current diffusion of water and drug, as well as gel layer erosion and drug dissolution, different dynamic interfaces can be identified, i.e. erosion front, diffusion front, transition or swelling front, and penetration front [4,5]. Front movements can also be adjusted by choosing various types of hydrophilic polymers, inducing different drug release kinetics such as Higuchi, First-order, and Zero-order kinetics [3,6]. However, these previous findings and conclusions were generally derived from single hypromellose polymer based matrix tablets [3,4,7].

  • Evaluation of retrograded starch as excipient for controlled release matrix tablets

    2017, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite the wide and successful research with alternative routes of drug administration, the oral route remains the preferable choice because of its inherent benefits, such as safety, easy administration, flexibility of formulation, greater patient adherence to the treatment and the possibility of releasing drugs both locally and systemically [1,2]. Among oral controlled release systems, matrix tablets were noteworthy by presenting efficient manufacturing technology and high reproducibility, which reflects in lower costs of production, mainly when the direct compression of the powders is their way of obtainment [3,4]. Swellable hydrophilic matrices are monolithic systems that do not degrade upon contact with the aqueous medium, undergoing hydration, which leads to the formation of a swollen diffusion layer, controlling the rates of release.

  • Hydroxyethyl Pachyman as a novel excipient for sustained-release matrix tablets

    2016, Carbohydrate Polymers
    Citation Excerpt :

    Among these polymers, natural and semi-synthetic polysaccharides have caused serious concern and widely used in drug controlled release due to their nontoxicity, safety, hydrophilicity, biodegradability and low cost. The polysaccharides such as chitosan, xanthan gum, guar gum, dextran, pectin or substituted cellulose derivatives like hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) and hydroxyethyl cellulose or synthetic polymers like poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and polyacrylic acid have been used as matrices for the sustained release of drugs (Fukuda, Peppas, & McGinity, 2006; Körner, Larsson, Piculell, & Wittgren, 2005; Maggi, Segale, Torre, Ochoa Machiste, & Conte, 2002; Marinich, Ferrero, & Jimenez-Castellanos, 2012; Neau, Chow, & Durrani, 1996; Sahasathian et al., 2007; Sriamornsak, Thirawong, Weerapol, Nunthanid, & Sungthongjeen, 2007; Tommasina, Pietro, Carlotta, & Franco, 2007). Poria cocos is the sclederma of Poria Cocos (Schw.)

  • Insights into the mechanisms of chitosan-anionic polymers-based matrix tablets for extended drug release

    2014, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
    Citation Excerpt :

    As a result of the counter-current diffusion of water and drug, as well as gel layer erosion and drug dissolution, different moving fronts have been identified: the erosion front, the diffusion front, the transition or swelling front, and penetration front (Kulinowski et al., 2012; Maderuelo et al., 2011). Front movements could be adjusted by choosing different types of polymers, further resulting in varied drug release kinetics such as Higuchi, First-order, and Zero-order kinetics (Marinich et al., 2012; Siepmann and Siepmann, 2012). Thus, to achieve desirable release profiles, polymers should be optimized based on their physicochemical properties associated with release mechanisms (Maderuelo et al., 2011).

  • Films from resistant starch-pectin dispersions intended for colonic drug delivery

    2014, Carbohydrate Polymers
    Citation Excerpt :

    Starch is a safe and nontoxic excipient, however, native starch does not present physical and chemical properties suitable to some specific uses and its modification by physical, chemical and enzymatic processes is necessary in order to modulate its properties (Zavareze & Dias, 2011). Thus, starch derivatives have been used in formulations of tablets, microparticles and coating films in order to reach desired drug release rates (López, García, & Zaritzky, 2008; Marinich, Ferrero, & Jiménez-Castellanos, 2012; Rashid, Al-Remawy, Leharne, Chowdhry, & Badwan, 2011; Teacă, Bodîrlău, & Spiridon, 2013; Tuovinen, Peltonen, et al., 2004; Tuovinen, Ruhanena, et al., 2004). Resistant starch (RS) is the starch fraction that resists digestion in stomach and duodenum, but is degraded by colonic microbiota (Htoon et al., 2010).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text