ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
European Journal of Operational Research
Volume 181, Issue 1, 16 August 2007, Pages 195-206
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (558 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.010    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Production, Manufacturing and Logistics

On operators and search space topology in multi-objective flow shop scheduling

Martin Josef GeigerCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aLehrstuhl für Industriebetriebslehre, Universität Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany

Received 19 January 2006; 
accepted 8 June 2006. 
Available online 14 August 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms identifies Pareto-optimal alternatives or their close approximation by means of a sequence of successive local improvement moves. While several successful applications to combinatorial optimization problems are known, studies of underlying problem structures are still scarce.

The paper presents a study of the problem structure of multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problems and investigates the effectiveness of local search neighborhoods within an evolutionary search framework. First, small problem instances with up to six objective functions for which the optimal alternatives are known are studied. Second, benchmark instances taken from literature are investigated. It turns out for the investigated data sets that the Pareto-optimal alternatives are found relatively concentrated in alternative space.

Also, it can be shown that no single neighborhood operator is able to equally identify all Pareto-optimal alternatives. Taking this into consideration, significant improvements have been obtained by combining different neighborhood structures into a multi-operator search framework.

Keywords: Multiple objective programming; Flow shop scheduling; Local search; Evolutionary computations

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. The multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problem
2.1. Problem statement
2.2. Neighborhood operators
3. Search space topology
3.1. Test instances
3.2. Measuring the distribution of Pareto-optimal alternatives
4. Effectiveness of heuristic search
4.1. Initial experiments
4.2. Multi-operator search
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References





 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.