EORTC Clinical Trial in Perspective

A multinational, multi-tumour basket study in very rare cancer types: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase II 90101 ‘CREATE’ trial

Rare cancers, which collectively account for almost 25 % of all malignancies, are poorly understood in terms of their aetiology and pathogenesis and are infrequently the focus of translational and clinical research to improve their diagnosis and treatment. Consequently, those affected have comparatively few treatment options, and their prognosis is worse than that of patients with more common entities. Here we review two relevant groups of rare cancers, bone and soft-tissue sarcomas and neuroendocrine tumours (NET), to illustrate recent efforts towards individualised, biology-guided clinical management to improve long-term outcomes. Specifically, we address how comprehensive, multi-layered molecular analyses, including the assessment of predisposing hereditary factors, and innovative imaging approaches can improve the diagnosis of these diseases, allow for better prognostic assessment, and provide new targets for pharmacologic and, in the case of NET, nuclear medicine interventions, whose clinical value must be determined in controlled trials optimally tailored to the particular patient population most likely to benefit. Furthermore, we describe the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in dedicated reference centres for rare cancers and the increasingly acknowledged potential of networking across institutions at a national and international level. Finally, we illustrate the value of a learning health system based on the systematic collection and sharing of the biological and clinical profiles of patients with rare cancers to achieve continuous cross-fertilisation of scientific and clinical efforts, making the vision of stratified precision medicine in these long-overlooked diseases a reality.

MET receptor has emerged as a druggable target across several human cancers. Agents targeting MET and its ligand hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) including small molecules such as crizotinib, tivantinib and cabozantinib or antibodies including rilotumumab and onartuzumab have proven their values in different tumors. Recently, capmatinib was approved for treatment of metastatic lung cancer with MET exon 14 skipping. In this review, we critically examine the current evidence on how HGF/MET combination therapies may take advantage of synergistic effects, overcome primary or acquired drug resistance, target tumor microenvironment, modulate drug metabolism or tackle pharmacokinetic issues. Preclinical and clinical studies on the combination of HGF/MET-targeted agents with conventional chemotherapeutics or molecularly targeted treatments (including EGFR, VEGFR, HER2, RAF/MEK, and PI3K/Akt targeting agents) and also the value of biomarkers are examined. Our deeper understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying successful pharmacological combinations is crucial to find the best personalized treatment regimens for cancer patients.

Molecular profiling provides the insight that specific genetic alterations can be detected across a wide range of different histologically characterised tumour types. Thus, the basic concept of basket trials (BTs) to target those genetic alterations with the same anti-tumour agents independent of the underlying tumour type was tumour agnostic. BTs can be divided into tumour gnostic, tumour semi-gnostic, and tumour agnostic trials which cover BTs of the conventional and the complex multiple-parallel type.

At the beginning of the use of BTs, the expectation that they would function agnostically was dominating. This period was followed by an avalanche of experiments, analyses, and commentaries that underlined the importance of the microenvironment of tumours and thereby the impact of tissue also on molecularly targeted therapies. Intra-tumour heterogeneity with the phenomena of both intrinsic resistant cancer cell subclones and treatment-emergent acquired mutations that result in drug resistance as well as the co-occurrence of multiple potentially actionable molecular alterations within a tumour necessitate combinatorial treatment. However, this setting has only scarcely been addressed by BTs so far.

Each of the various subtypes of BTs has contributed to meet the main goal of drug development, the approval of the agents tested. The position of BTs within the drug approval process and their potential impact on the off-label use of targeted agents are referred to as well.

This review highlights the achievements reached with BTs along with failures. Selected issues of controversy are critically discussed, and potential solutions are addressed.

Recent years have seen a change in the way that clinical trials are being conducted. There has been a rise of designs more flexible than traditional adaptive and group sequential trials which allow the investigation of multiple substudies with possibly different objectives, interventions, and subgroups conducted within an overall trial structure, summarized by the term master protocol. This review aims to identify existing master protocol studies and summarize their characteristics. The review also identifies articles relevant to the design of master protocol trials, such as proposed trial designs and related methods.

We conducted a comprehensive systematic search to review current literature on master protocol trials from a design and analysis perspective, focusing on platform trials and considering basket and umbrella trials. Articles were included regardless of statistical complexity and classified as reviews related to planned or conducted trials, trial designs, or statistical methods. The results of the literature search are reported, and some features of the identified articles are summarized.

Most of the trials using master protocols were designed as single-arm (n = 29/50), Phase II trials (n = 32/50) in oncology (n = 42/50) using a binary endpoint (n = 26/50) and frequentist decision rules (n = 37/50). We observed an exponential increase in publications in this domain during the last few years in both planned and conducted trials, as well as relevant methods, which we assume has not yet reached its peak. Although many operational and statistical challenges associated with such trials remain, the general consensus seems to be that master protocols provide potentially enormous advantages in efficiency and flexibility of clinical drug development.

Master protocol trials and especially platform trials have the potential to revolutionize clinical drug development if the methodologic and operational challenges can be overcome.

We report the clinical findings and results of treatment in the cohort of patients with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) managed according to the European pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) protocol from 2005 to 2016.

Patients (<25 years old) with IMT from 9 countries were prospectively registered via a web-based system. Their histology was reviewed by a national/international pathology panel. Immunohistochemistry for ALK assessment was mandatory. No adjuvant therapy was suggested for initially resected tumors. No specific systemic therapy was recommended for cases of unresectable disease.

Among 80 cases of IMT registered, 20 were excluded because pathology review led to a revised diagnosis. Of the remaining 60 patients (median age 9.5 years), 59 had localized, and 1 had multifocal/metastatic disease. The lung was the primary site in 14 cases. IMT developed as a second tumor in 2 cases. Forty cases were ALK-positive, and 20 were ALK-negative. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 82.9% and 98.1%, respectively. No clinical variables correlated statistically with the outcome: survival was the same for ALK-positive and ALK-negative cases. The overall response to systemic therapy was 64%: 8/10 cases responded to vinblastine-methotrexate chemotherapy, and 5/5 to ALK-inhibitors.

This study demonstrated a good overall prognosis for IMT, even for initially unresectable disease and in ALK-negative cases. Chemotherapy is still a valid option for advanced disease. Larger studies involving both pediatric and adult patients are needed to clarify the role of ALK inhibitors.