Elsevier

Ecological Indicators

Volume 91, August 2018, Pages 105-115
Ecological Indicators

Original Articles
Production and decomposition rates of different fen species as targets for restoration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.069Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We studied rich fen NPP and decomposition as indicators for restoration monitoring.

  • Contribution to NPP in decreasing importance: roots, bryophytes, trees, herbs and shrubs.

  • Bryophyte reintroduction could help to reach the restoration goal of carbon sequestration.

  • Species with high root production, such as graminoids, should be selected for restoration.

  • Hummock plant community had a higher peat accumulation potential.

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in considering ecosystem processes after fen restoration, and not solely species composition. To evaluate the success of ecological restoration, comparisons with targets from reference ecosystems are required. We documented net primary production (NPP) and decomposition of the main vegetation components in order to describe a reference data set for ecological restoration of moderately rich to rich minerotrophic peatlands (fens) in southeastern Canada. Data collection included three growing seasons for herbs and shrubs and two growing seasons for belowground biomass, trees and bryophytes. Average NPP for above and belowground biomass of three selected natural basin fens were 450 g m−2 yr−1. Belowground NPP represented 45% of the total NPP. Sphagnum warnstorfii was the most productive bryophyte (140 g m−2 yr−1) and the slowest plant species to decompose (exponential decomposition constant k = 0.07 yr−1). The brown mosses Tomenthypnum nitens, Campylium stellatum and Scorpidium cossonii had a NPP of 79, 69 and 92 g m−2 yr−1, respectively, and decomposed at the same rate (identical k values of 0.14 yr−1). Trees covered a large surface area in the fens, with an average NPP of 73 g m−2 yr−1. S. warnstorfii contributed to hummocks having a higher peat accumulation potential than lawn vegetation. The graminoid Trichophorum cespitosum significantly increased NPP in lawns and should be targeted in restoration plans for fens. To restore peat accumulating processes (production and decomposition) in fens, bryophytes should be the primary focus for re-introduction, specifically species that are adapted to living in drier conditions, such as hummock species. The range of variability for NPP and decomposition established by this study should be considered as a decision tool in restoration projects to monitor restored ecosystems trajectories and successes.

Introduction

Peatlands are ecosystems where plant biomass production is greater than decomposition (Moore and Bellamy, 1974). Over a long period of time, partially decomposed vegetation (peat), forms organic soils rich in carbon. To be considered a peatland, the waterlogged ecosystem must have at least 30–40 cm of accumulated peat which must contain more than 30% organic matter according to various national classification systems (National Wetlands Working Group, NWWG, 1997). Peatlands are classified into two broad types based on vegetation, water regime and chemistry. Ombrotrophic peatlands, or bogs, are exclusively rain fed and dominated by Sphagnum mosses that help to maintain the pH under 4.0 (Rydin and Jeglum, 2013, Rochefort et al., 2012). Minerotrophic peatlands, or fens, are to some extent connected to the regional watershed. The hydrology and water chemistry determine the gradient from poor to moderately rich to extremely rich fens, which influence vegetation composition (Sjörs, 1950Sjörs, 1950Sjörs, 1950, Chee and Vitt, 1989, Sjörs and Gunnarsson, 2002, Vitt, 2006, Rydin and Jeglum, 2013, Rochefort et al., 2012). Poor fens have a pH between 4.2 and 5.5 and, like bogs, are dominated by Sphagnum mosses. Moderately rich or intermediate and rich fens have a pH above 5.5 and are dominated by brown mosses, an ecological group of species mostly of the Amblystegiaceae and Calliergonaceae, and fen-adapted species of Sphagnum mosses. Rich fens can also be composed in part or exclusively of graminoid plants. There is a great variation between poor and rich fens in terms of vegetation and water chemistry. This study focused on moderately rich to extreme rich fens as described by Rochefort et al. (2012).

The ability to store large amounts of carbon over millennia is unique to peatlands (Gorham, 1991, Vasander and Kettunen, 2006). The estimates of accumulated carbon in northern peatlands are 500 (±100) Gt (Yu, 2012). Disturbances and modification of vegetation composition affect peatland functions by switching the carbon balance from sinks to source (Waddington et al., 2002, Turetsky et al., 2011, Rankin, 2016). The estimate of total peatland losses worldwide is 10–20% (Joosten and Clarke, 2002). In southeastern Canada, pressure on peatlands for agriculture, forestry and peat extraction is critical at a regional scale (Pellerin and Poulin, 2013). The release of greenhouse gases by disturbed and unrestored peatlands is a concern in a climate change context because this contributes to positive feedback loops of rising temperature and precipitation (IPCC, 2013).

Peatland restoration aims to re-establish the carbon sequestration function by the recovery of suitable hydrology and adequate plant diversity after a disturbance event (Rochefort et al., 2003, Grand-Clement et al., 2013, Lamers et al., 2015). Restoration efforts include rewetting through ditch blocking and, if necessary, reprofiling the peat surface with bunds and terracing to evenly redistribute the water (Price et al., 2003, Malloy and Price, 2014). In a long-term perspective, the rewetting of the peatland encourages vegetation to recolonize the former degraded peatlands, and may be sufficient to recover some of the carbon sequestration function (Tuittila et al., 1999). But the trajectory of the restored community toward the targets remains hard to predict (Triisberg et al., 2011, Gagnon, 2016). Active reintroduction of vegetation (i.e. by targeting slow to decompose species such as Sphagnum spp. or highly productive species such as tall or tussock sedge species) may accelerate peat accumulation recovery (Lucchese et al., 2010). Projects to restore moderately-rich to rich peatlands that have undergone land-use changes have increased in interest over the last decade in North America as the awareness of the need to preserve fen ecosystem increases (Graf et al., 2012, Schimelpfenig et al., 2014, Chimner et al., 2017).

Inclusion of a reference ecosystem is part of the planning and is essential to any restoration project. Throughout the project, the reference will act as a standard for comparison and evaluation (SERI, 2004, Clewell and Aronson, 2013, Shackelford et al., 2013). It will help define realistic goals and will be used during the monitoring phase to assess if the restored ecosystem reached the desired state of recovery (SERI, 2004). To define the reference, studies of similar natural ecosystem from the region are usually used (White and Walker, 1997). There is a gap in knowledge about reference targets for fens in southeastern Canada, particularly regarding the ecological function of peat accumulation. An estimate of the net primary production (NPP) and the decomposition decay constant from vegetation communities are required to estimate peat accumulation potential.

Variations in vegetation influence net primary production (NPP) and decomposition in peatlands. Among other important environmental variables impacting NPP, there are the level of photosynthetic radiation, water table depth, and nutrient availability (Blodau, 2002, Wieder, 2006), while the decomposition is affected by the chemical composition of the litter (Thormann and Bayley, 1997a), abiotic conditions such as climate, soil temperature, and water table depth (Moore et al., 2007), and microbial biota (Andersen et al., 2010). Moderately rich fens produce more biomass than bogs or extreme rich fens because of well-developed vegetation layers including mosses, sedges and shrubs (Szumigalski and Bayley, 1996, Thormann and Bayley, 1997b). Accumulation of peat in sedge-dominated fen occurs because the process can rely on the high production of sedges that overcome their fast decomposition rate (Brinson et al., 1981, Vitt, 1990, Thormann et al., 1999). In brown moss-dominated fens, the herb layer is less developed and the peat accumulation process is heavily influenced by the slower decomposition rate of brown mosses rather than their production rate (Vitt, 1990). In both sedges and moss-dominated fens, the belowground compartment may play an important role in the peat accumulation function, but its production and decomposition rates are rarely estimated (e.g. Reader and Stewart, 1972, Wallén, 1986, Backéus, 1990, Sjörs, 1991). Finally, microtopographic gradients are present in fens dominated by mosses, but have not been specifically studied in the literature. Particular species colonize hummock, lawn and hollow biotopes (Gignac, 1992) and have different production and decomposition patterns (Vitt, 1990, Johnson and Damman, 1991). There is an interest in studying the plant communities colonizing these main biotopes in fens as it can impact decision making during restoration planning. Therefore, an accurate knowledge of NPP and decomposition for the main vegetation classes and biotopes will improve estimation of the peat accumulation potential of a peatland community, and therefore target the preferred plant community for restoration.

The aim of this study was to establish indicators for fen restoration success for two important processes of fens: biomass production and decomposition. We estimated above and belowground net primary production, as well as the litter decomposition decay constant of the main vegetation classes (bryophytes, herbs, shrubs and trees). We also determined if either hummock or lawn plant communities present higher peat accumulation potential. Based on the observation that the dominant species colonizing the hummock biotope is Sphagnum spp., a group recognized for its slow decay rate that should contribute to increased peat accumulation potential, we hypothesized that the hummock plant community should be targeted during restoration. The general outcome was to select a plant community as a functional indicator to improve the restoration of the peat accumulation of peatlands. We used simple methods that could be used for monitoring fen restoration programs to evaluate the progress of the return of functions over time.

Section snippets

Site description

Production and decomposition measurements were conducted in three natural fens located in the Appalachian foothills of the St. Lawrence Lowlands, Quebec, Canada. Mean annual temperature of the area is 5.5 °C over the past 100 years, with a minimum average temperature of −11.4 °C in January and maximum average temperature of 18.3 °C in July. Average precipitation is 959 mm per year of which 71% falls as rain (Environment Canada, 2015).

From previous inventories in the same area, we found that

Net primary production

On average, for the three studied moderately rich fens, the total NPP of aboveground (bryophytes, herbs, shrubs and trees) and belowground (roots) was 450 g m−2 yr−1 (Table 2). The sites varied between 367 and 514 g m−2 yr−1 from Joncs to BSF (Table 2). The proportion of belowground annual production was 45% of the total NPP. The remaining 55% was accounted for by the aboveground production and was shared in decreasing order of importance between trees, bryophytes, herbs and shrubs.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to estimate net primary production (NPP) and decomposition rate of moderately-rich and wooded fens located in northeastern North America. As the interest to define main indicators increase to strengthen fen restoration planning and monitoring, this study brought an actual assessment as well as new perspectives of production and decomposition. In order to improve the rates of peat accumulation functions in restored peatlands, two vegetation classes are

Conclusions

This study documented net primary production (NPP) and surface litter decomposition of the main vegetation components in order to be used as reference targets for ecological restoration of moderately rich to rich minerotrophic peatlands in southeastern Canada. From our results, a hummock biotope, composed of S. warnstorfii, T. nitens and shrubs should be reintroduced in the restored system since this community had a better potential to recover peat accumulation function in the short term

Acknowledgments

Financial support was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss Association and its members. Vicky Bérubé’s personal grants were provided by the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies. We thank numerous field and laboratory assistants for their precious help. We owe a particular thank you to Marie-Eve Gauthier, Phan Cat Tuong, Kathy Pouliot, Catherine Emond, and Gilles Berger for their assistance in

References (82)

  • V. Bérubé et al.

    Fen restoration: defining a reference ecosystem using paleoecological stratigraphy and present-day inventories

    Botany

    (2017)
  • C. Blodau

    Carbon cycling in peatlands – a review of processes and controls

    Environ. Rev.

    (2002)
  • M.M. Brinson et al.

    Primary productivity, decomposition, and consumer activity in freshwater wetlands

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.

    (1981)
  • C. Campbell et al.

    Net Primary Production and Standing Biomass in Northern Continental Wetlands

    (2000)
  • W.-L. Chee et al.

    The vegetation, surface water chemistry and peat chemistry of moderate-rich fens in central Alberta, Canada

    Wetlands

    (1989)
  • R.A. Chimner et al.

    Modeling carbon accumulation in Rocky Mountain fens

    Wetlands

    (2002)
  • R.A. Chimner et al.

    An overview of peatland restoration in North America: where are we after 25 years?

    Restor. Ecol.

    (2017)
  • A.F. Clewell et al.

    Ecological restoration principles, values, and structures of an emerging profession

    (2013)
  • Environment Canada

    Canadian Climate Normals 1981-2010 Station Data

    (2015)
  • Faubert, J. 2007. Catalogue des bryophytes du Québec et du Labrador. Provancheria: Mémoire de l'Herbier Louis-Marie, no...
  • L. Finér et al.

    The ingrowth bag method in measuring root production on peatland sites

    Scand. J. Forest Res.

    (2000)
  • Gagnon, F. 2016. La régénération spontanée d’une tourbière manitobaine après extraction de la tourbe: diversité des...
  • D.L. Gignac

    Niche structure, resource partitioning, and species interactions of mire bryophytes relative to climatic and ecological gradients in Western Canada

    Bryologist

    (1992)
  • S. Gogo et al.

    In situ and laboratory non-additive litter mixture effect on C dynamics of Sphagnum rubellum and Molinia caerulea litters

    J. Soils Sediments

    (2016)
  • E. Gorham

    Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable response to climatic warming

    Ecol. Appl.

    (1991)
  • M.D. Graf et al.

    Examining the peat-accumulating potential of fen vegetation in the context of fen restoration of harvested peatlands

    Ecoscience

    (2009)
  • M.D. Graf et al.

    Restoration of peatlands after peat extraction: Impacts, restoration goals, and techniques

  • E. Grand-Clement et al.

    Evaluating ecosystem goods and services after restoration of marginal upland peatlands in South-West England

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2013)
  • M.L. Hallett et al.

    Do we practice what we preach? Goal setting for ecological restoration

    Restor. Ecol.

    (2013)
  • B. Hoorens et al.

    Litter quality and interactive effects in litter mixtures: more negative interactions under elevated CO2?

    J. Ecol.

    (2002)
  • Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) on-line database [online]. http://www.itis.gov (accessed on 4 April...
  • IPCC, 2013. Supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: wetlands, chapter...
  • L.C. Johnson et al.

    Species-controlled Sphagnum decay on a South Swedish raised bog

    Oikos

    (1991)
  • H. Joosten et al.

    Wise Use of Mires and Peatlands – Background and Principles Including a Framework for Decision-making

    (2002)
  • M.-C. Lambert et al.

    Canadian national tree aboveground biomass équations

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (2005)
  • L.P.M. Lamers et al.

    Ecological restoration of rich fens in Europe and North America: from trial and error to an evidence-based approach

    Biol. Rev.

    (2015)
  • T.R. Moore

    Plant production, decomposition and carbon efflux in a subarctic patterned fen

    Arctic Alpine Res.

    (1989)
  • P.D. Moore et al.

    Peatlands

    (1974)
  • T.R. Moore et al.

    Litter decomposition in temperate peatland ecosystems: the effect of substrate and site

    Ecosystems

    (2007)
  • National Wetlands Working Group. 1997. The Canadian wetland classification system (second ed.). In: B.G. Warner, C.D.A....
  • É. Paradis et al.

    The lagg ecotone: an integrative part of bog ecosystems in North America

    Plant Ecol.

    (2015)
  • View full text