The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation
Introduction
The articles that make up this special section of Ecological Economics all have one common feature. Either explicitly or implicitly, they address the need for valuing the services provided by the natural environment in order to achieve more informed resource policy decisions. It is not always possible or efficient to conduct an original valuation study for each specific geographic area or service of concern. This article addresses the potential for using benefit transfer to estimate the value of nonmarket environmental goods and services generated by ecosystem processes. We first discuss the growing demand for monetized values of ecosystem services, and the role of benefit transfer in meeting this demand. We then review accepted guidelines for conducting benefit transfers and discuss advancements in transfer methods and modeling techniques. Next, we discuss the role of web-based resources in the valuation of ecosystem services along with recent references that provide in-depth reviews of these resources. Finally, we offer suggestions for improving benefit transfers in the spirit of improving ecosystem service valuation for future project or policy analysis.
Section snippets
The Demand for and Supply of Ecosystem Service Valuation Research
Growth in human population or per-capita resource consumption, shifting public preferences, increasing resource scarcity, declining environmental health and many other pressures mean that policymakers across the globe face increasingly complex decisions about natural resource management. Coupled with recent global assessments of the status of ecosystems and the benefits they provide to society (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), 2011, UK
Benefit Transfer as a Method to Estimate Ecosystem Service Values
Benefit transfer is broadly defined as “…the use of existing data or information in settings other than for what it was originally collected” (Rosenberger and Loomis, 2003, p. 445). In the context discussed here, this involves the transfer of original ecosystem service value estimates from an existing ‘study site’ or multiple study sites to an unstudied ‘policy site’ with similar characteristics that is being evaluated. Benefit transfer is increasingly being used to meet the demand for
The Future of Benefit Transfer in Ecosystem Service Valuation
Benefit transfer has been widely practiced for several decades now. The motivation driving its use, namely, to supply information on ecosystem service values for use in policy decisions, is only growing. Given that economic analyses must be available in a timely manner to be policy-relevant, and often face budget constraints that prevent original study, the existing stock of welfare estimates will continue to be drawn on for valuation studies for new policy sites. Considerable advancements in
References (89)
- et al.
A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation
Ecosyst. Serv.
(2013) - et al.
What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
Ecol. Econ.
(2007) - et al.
The recreational value of coral reefs: a meta-analysis
Ecol. Econ.
(2007) Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects
Ecol. Econ.
(2000)- et al.
Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices
Environ. Pollut.
(2011) - et al.
Ecosystem services: classification for valuation
Biol. Conserv.
(2008) - et al.
Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
Ecol. Econ.
(2009) - et al.
Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA
Ecol. Econ.
(2011) - et al.
Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
Ecol. Econ.
(2006) - et al.
Clean water, ecological benefits, and benefits transfer: a work in progress at the U.S. EPA
Ecol. Econ.
(2006)
Valuing ecosystem services from wetlands restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley
Ecol. Econ.
An operational structure for clarity in ecosystem service values
Ecol. Econ.
The quest for the “optimal” payment for environmental services program: ambition meets reality, with useful lessons
For. Policy Econ.
A willingness-to-pay function for protecting acres of spotted owl habitat from fire
Ecol. Econ.
Reducing barriers in future benefit transfers: needed improvements in primary study design and reporting
Ecol. Econ.
Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis
Ecol. Econ.
International valuation databases: overview, methods and operational issues
Ecol. Econ.
Non-market valuation databases: how useful are they?
Econ. Anal. Policy
Evaluating the accuracy of the benefit transfer method: a rural water supply application in the USA
J. Environ. Manag.
The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: an updated meta-analysis
Ecol. Econ.
Measurement, generalization, and publication: sources of error in benefit transfers and their management
Ecol. Econ.
What have we learned since Hotelling's letter? A meta-analysis
Econ. Lett.
Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer
Ecol. Econ.
Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy
Ecol. Econ.
The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis
Ecol. Econ.
A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe
J. For. Econ.
The decision to use benefit transfer or conduct original valuation research for benefit–cost and policy analysis
Contemp. Econ. Policy
Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services
Ecosyst. Serv.
Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in U.K. woodland recreation values
Land Econ.
Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments
Environ. Resour. Econ.
Making benefit transfers work: deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe
Environ. Resour. Econ.
The economics of rural and agricultural ecosystem services: purism versus practicality
Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev.
On measuring economic values for nature
Environ. Sci. Technol.
The Definition and Choice of Environmental Commodities for Nonmarket Valuation
RFF DP 09-35
Benefit transfer studies: myths, pragmatism, and idealism
Water Resour. Res.
What do we know about groundwater values? Preliminary implications from a meta analysis of contingent-valuation studies
Am. J. Agric. Econ.
The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and meta-analysis of the literature
Environ. Resour. Econ.
The validity of environmental benefits transfer: further empirical testing
Environ. Resour. Econ.
A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies
Reg. Environ. Chang.
Economic science, endangered species, and biodiversity loss
Conserv. Biol.
The value of the world's ecosystems and natural capital
Nature
Why ecosystem-based management may fail without changes to tool development and financing
Bioscience
Benefits transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies
Water Resour. Res.
On the tactics of benefit estimation under Executive Order 12291
Cited by (235)
Societal benefits of floodplains in the Chesapeake Bay and Delaware River watersheds: Sediment, nutrient, and flood regulation ecosystem services
2023, Journal of Environmental Management