ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Decision Support Systems
Volume 42, Issue 3, December 2006, Pages 1290-1306
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (422 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.10.009    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Matching knowledge elements in concept maps using a similarity flooding algorithm

Byron Marshalla, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Hsinchun Chenb and Therani Madhusudanb

aOregon State University, Department of Accounting, Finance, and Information Management, United States bUniversity of Arizona, MIS Department, United States

Received 4 May 2005; 
revised 15 August 2005; 
accepted 24 October 2005. 
Available online 29 November 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Concept mapping systems used in education and knowledge management emphasize flexibility of representation to enhance learning and facilitate knowledge capture. Collections of concept maps exhibit terminology variance, informality, and organizational variation. These factors make it difficult to match elements between maps in comparison, retrieval, and merging processes. In this work, we add an element anchoring mechanism to a similarity flooding (SF) algorithm to match nodes and substructures between pairs of simulated maps and student-drawn concept maps. Experimental results show significant improvement over simple string matching with combined recall accuracy of 91% for conceptual nodes and concept → link → concept propositions in student-drawn maps.

Keywords: Semantic matching; Concept mapping; Semantic networks; Conceptual graphs; Computer assisted instruction

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Literature review and background
2.1. Concept map (CM) applications
2.2. Computational challenges
2.2.1. Terminology variation
2.2.2. Informality
2.2.3. Organizational variation
2.3. Matching techniques
2.4. Similarity flooding
3. Research questions
3.1. GetSmart system
3.2. Observed vocabulary overlap
3.3. Observed organizational variations
4. Implementation
5. Simulation experiment
5.1. Simulation experimental design
5.2. Simulation experiment results
6. Student-drawn map experiment
6.1. Student-drawn map experimentation
6.2. Student-drawn map results
7. Discussion
8. Conclusions and future directions
Acknowledgements
References
Vitae












Decision Support Systems
Volume 42, Issue 3, December 2006, Pages 1290-1306
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.