Digestive EndoscopyInterobserver agreement among endoscopists on evaluation of polypoid colorectal lesions visualized with the Pentax i-Scan technique
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third cause of cancer death in the USA [1] and the fourth most common form of cancer in the world, as well as one of the most frequent in the Western world [2]. It is widely accepted that adenomatous polyps, which represent one half to two thirds of all colorectal polyps [3], [4], are precursors of CRC; multiple genetic alterations have been implicated in the evolution of adenoma to carcinoma [5]. Colonoscopy is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosing colorectal neoplasia [6], [7] and colonoscopy with polypectomy of neoplastic adenomatous lesions reduces the risk of CRC by as much as 80% for a period that may exceed 10 years [8]; furthermore, it has recently been reported that this strategy also prevents death from CRC [9]. Although colonoscopy is the gold standard screening modality for CRC, it does have some diagnostic limitations. Some studies have shown an overall neoplasm miss rate of up to 22% [10], [11].
Lesions suspicious of neoplasia and protruding adenomas are easy to identify with colonoscopy but the recognition of flat, depressed adenomatous lesions is sometimes difficult, especially when they are hidden by colonic folds, and is only possible with thorough, careful inspection [12]. Chromoendoscopy performed with magnifying endoscopes, although time-consuming, has been shown to identify colonic lesions easily, especially flat, small or depressed ones, and to predict histology reliably based on the surface pit-pattern architecture [13], [14].
New endoscopic techniques have been developed with the aim of improving the detection rate of small polyps and facilitating the differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps, with the possibility of visualizing the pit-pattern correctly. Advances in colonoscopy technology, such as Fuji intelligent chromoendoscopy (FICE), narrow band imaging (NBI) and the Pentax i-Scan electronic technique have the potential to improve the early detection of CRC. The i-Scan technique is a new, high-definition (HD+) image-enhanced endoscopy technique, with an electronic post-processing light filter using different software algorithms and real-time image mapping (RIM).
Although electronic chromoendoscopy techniques such as NBI and FICE are useful for detecting and diagnosing early neoplastic lesions with or without magnifying endoscopy [15], these techniques yield images that are much darker than conventional white-light images, particularly in regions of the gastrointestinal tract with a large lumen. Pentax i-Scan images are as bright as conventional, white-light images and, compared to FICE and NBI, are able to visualize much larger areas in a distant view and, unlike NBI, do not require staying close to the bowel wall. Furthermore, this Pentax technique does not need endoscopic magnification for the observation of the margins of lesions. There are, however, few studies in the literature about this new technique and, in particular, about which endoscopic Pentax i-Scan settings are most helpful in the differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colonic lesions.
Pentax i-Scan HD+ is a new, fully digital, high-definition, video-endoscopic system. The particular characteristics of the new Pentax Hi Line HD+ endoscopes, compared to those of the previous series, are that a megapixel CCD chip contains about 1,300,000 pixels compared to the approximately 410,000 pixels in the standard, digital zoom, which can double the magnification of the image. The EPK-i video processor processes a high-definition video (DVI-D) signal output with a progressive scan image that simultaneously moves all the lines and the pixels of the image. The system can achieve an endoscopic image resolution about three times higher than that of a standard endoscope. The video processor also offers the functions of the i-Scan, a filter system that can enhance the scanned images in real-time by modifying the software.
The i-Scan technology combines brightness of light (on a scale from −5 to +5) with noise reduction (low, medium and high) and three types of enhancement of the scanned image (surface enhancement – SE; contrast enhancement – CE; tone enhancement – TE) which, thanks to real-time changes in software algorithms, can be used individually or in combination. These algorithms, by emphasizing the virtual colour and contrast of the mucosa, provide a better view of the vascular patterns and architecture of the mucosa thus improving the identification of subtle surface irregularities of the mucosa and vasculature. These algorithms could, therefore, facilitate the identification of pre-cancerous lesions, even small ones. The more uniform lighting system and an image projected on a full screen give a new, improved depth of endoscopic view of the field.
With SE, the differences in luminance intensity (scale: from 4 to 6) between the pixels concerned and the surrounding pixels is analysed and the edge components are enhanced. The adjustment of the noise erasure function provides greater enhancement of the edges, corresponding to small variations in structure. Moreover, SE improves the visualization of minute glandular structures, making it easier to identify changes on the basis of structural differences.
With CE, areas of lower luminance (scale: from 2 to 6) are identified on the basis of pixel-wise luminance intensity data, followed by relative enhancement of the blue (B) component through slight suppression of the red (R) and green (G) components. The low luminance areas are then coloured slightly bluish-white and minute irregularities on the mucosal surface are enhanced. Irregular glandular structures in flat mucosa are also enhanced.
This function electronically substitutes the vital staining with various dyes used in endoscopy. The white-light images are processed and broken down into three main colour components (red, green and blue). The EPK-i works on the dynamics of the electronic components of colour (primarily the red component) through an algorithm and processes the image by enhancing the desired colour. TE functions available are similar to those of chromoendoscopy and are divided into TE p (pit-pattern), v (vessels), e (oesophagus), b (Barrett), g (gastric) and c (colonic).
Until now, no studies on interobserver agreement using the i-Scan technique have been reported. The aim of this work was to assess the interobserver agreement on the visualization of the surface (identifying the colonic pit-pattern) and margins of polyps and in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps, based on the interpretation of the pit-pattern.
Section snippets
Methods
In September 2011, during a meeting of the Italian branch of Pentax, eight expert endoscopists from five digestive endoscopy centres, who had been using the Pentax i-Scan technique from more than 1 year and were blinded to enhancement set, were invited to evaluate 400 previously selected Pentax i-Scan images.
Images of colorectal polyps were retrieved and selected by an experienced endoscopist who was excluded from the panel of evaluating endoscopists. Images that were obviously blurry, captured
Results
A total of 400 mixed images of polyps (38 sessile and 12 pedunculated) from 50 different patients (37 males and 13 females; mean age: 65.3 ± 8.7 years) with a diameter >5 mm and <10 mm (7.5 ± 2.1 mm) were retrieved and used for the final analysis; each endoscopist evaluated all 400 images, and no indeterminate responses were given.
Discussion
To our knowledge this is the first study assessing the interobserver agreement with regards to distinguishing between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps and correct visualization of the pit-pattern and the margins of the polyps on images recorded with different settings of the i-Scan technique.
High-definition resolution has recently entered the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy and the first promising data report a high rate of detection of adenomas [18], [19], [20], even though the value
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References (25)
- et al.
Screening, surveillance, and primary prevention for colorectal cancer: a review of the recent literature
Gastroenterology
(2008) - et al.
American Gastroenterological Association American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technology assessment on image-enhanced endoscopy
Gastroenterology
(2008) - et al.
Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK
Lancet
(2000) - et al.
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies
Gastroenterology
(1997) - et al.
Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic colorectal lesions
American Journal of Gastroenterology
(2001) - et al.
High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging
Gastroenterology
(2007) - et al.
Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial
Gastroenterology
(2008) - et al.
Interobserver and intra-observer consistency in the endoscopic assessment of colonic pit patterns
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
(2004) - et al.
Narrow-band imaging versus I-Scan for the real-time histological prediction of diminutive colonic polyps: a prospective comparative study by using the simple unified endoscopic classification
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
(2011) - et al.
Intraobserver and interobserver consistency for grading esophagitis with narrow-band imaging
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
(2007)
Endoscopic assessment and grading of Barrett's esophagus using magnification endoscopy and narrow-band imaging: accuracy and interobserver agreement of different classification systems (with videos)
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Cancer statistics
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Cited by (10)
High definition endoscopy with or without I-Scan increases the detection of celiac disease during routine endoscopy
2016, Digestive and Liver DiseaseCitation Excerpt :Secondly the pressure on time constraints, in conjunction with shifting visual reference points could be one reason for the findings. Finally I-Scan has been developed to aid identification of neoplastic lesions, such as polyps or dysplasia, largely within areas of otherwise normal mucosa [34,38–40]. In CD, macroscopic changes are likely to affect the entirety of the mucosa studied creating a more uniform image which may not be adequately augmented by I-Scan.
Advanced imaging in barrett's esophagus: Are we ready to relinquish the random?
2013, Clinical Gastroenterology and HepatologyRed flag imaging techniques in Barrett's Esophagus
2013, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :However, in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, I-Scan may significantly improve detection of small esophageal reflux lesions when used with WLE.53–55 Several studies have reported the use of I-Scan during colonoscopy, suggesting that it is equivalent to NBI for predicting histology in diminutive colon polyps,56 good interobserver agreement exists,57 and it shows improvement over HD-WLE for predicting neoplastic versus nonneoplastic polyps.58 Prospective, randomized, controlled studies are yet to be conducted to determine the true added value of digital chromoendoscopy in routine clinical practice.
A roadmap for the clinical implementation of optical-imaging biomarkers
2019, Nature Biomedical EngineeringVirtual chromoendoscopy with i-scan and its application for detection and characterization of colon polyps
2017, Revista Colombiana de GastroenterologiaNon-polypoid colorectal neoplasms: Classification, therapy and follow-up: 2015 Advances in Colorectal Cancer
2015, World Journal of Gastroenterology