ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Digital Investigation
Volume 3, Issue 2, June 2006, Pages 65-67
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (73 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.diin.2006.04.003    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Peer review

D. Bradburya, E-mail The Corresponding Author

a5 Heidi Close, Toftwood, Dereham, Norfolk, NR19 1NS, UK

Received 17 April 2006; 
revised 24 April 2006; 
accepted 24 April 2006. 
Available online 12 June 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Peer to peer networks can be used for good, and bad. Danny Bradbury finds out how investigators weed out the latter.


Digital Investigation
Volume 3, Issue 2, June 2006, Pages 65-67
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.