Notes
Comparison of several commercial serologic kits and Em18 serology for detection of human alveolar echinococcosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.03.018Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study was to design the best serologic strategy for diagnosing human alveolar echinococcosis (AE) cases in medical laboratory routine procedures. By combining 2 screening techniques, indirect hemagglutination with Em2plus-ELISA and/or recEm18-ELISA, 46 of 47 AE cases were detected. The necessary confirmation of results is then obtained by using immunoblot (LDBIO-IB® and/or recEm18-IB).

Section snippets

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mrs. Sonoyo Itoh, Pascale Simon, and Florence Skana for their excellent technical support. We also thank Lois Rose for her editorial assistance. This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (142556001, 17256002) from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science to AI.

References (8)

  • S. Bresson-Hadni et al.

    Imaging aspect and non-surgical interventional treatment in human alveolar echinococcosis

    Parasitol. Int.

    (2006)
  • B. Gottstein et al.

    Improved primary immunodiagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis in humans by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the Em2plus antigen

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (1993)
  • A. Ito et al.

    Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with affinity-purified Em18 and an ELISA with recombinant Em18 for differential diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis: results of a blind test

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • M. Liance et al.

    Immunodiagnosis of Echinococcus infections: confirmatory testing and species differentiation by a new commercial Western Blot

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2000)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (24)

  • Large-scale evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test for human cystic echinococcosis

    2017, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Citation Excerpt :

    If at least one first-line test was positive or equivocal, an immunoblot test (Echinococcus Western Blot IgG, LDBIO Diagnostic, Lyon, France) was used to confirm the positive result, as proposed in French National Health Ministry recommendations (available on the website from French National Health Insurance at http://www.codage.ext.cnamts.fr/f_mediam/fo/nabm/DOC043.pdf) and WHO-IWGE guidelines (Brunetti et al., 2010). The combination of the tests and the use of lowered cut-off values, for IHA (Bart et al., 2007) as well for Echinococcus granulosus and Em2plus ELISA (unpublished data) optimize the sensitivity of first-line analyses. A positive immunoblot is then required to confirm a positive sample or eliminate a false positive sample.

  • Development of a colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip based on HSP70 for the rapid detection of Echinococcus granulosus in sheep

    2017, Veterinary Parasitology
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, specialized equipment are required in most of these diagnosis methods, on the other hand, immunochromatographic strip is a rapid, cheap and specific detection technique that can be completed within 30 min. The application of the various recombinant antigens such as Em18, antigen B and antigen 5 has been reported in the serodiagnosis of echinococcosis (Bart et al., 2007; Ito et al., 2007; Reiterova et al., 2014). HSP70 was first identified by Colebrook and Lightowlers (1997) as an immunogen; Ortona et al. (2003) also found HSP70 of E. granulosus (Eg2HSP70) as an antigenic molecule inducing both B and T cell responses.

  • Diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis

    2014, Revue Francophone des Laboratoires
  • Comparison of the usefulness of hydatid cyst fluid, native antigen B and recombinant antigen B8/1 for serological diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis

    2012, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
    Citation Excerpt :

    This is consistent with results of other studies which have used this antigen for sero-diagnosis of CE.9,13,22 Through our previous studies,9,12,13,19,23–26 we expected that native antigens might include many non-specific components which may cause cross reactivity with other parasitic or even non-parasitic infections. Therefore, the positive reaction of non-CE patients and Iranian healthy subjects might be due to infection with some other diseases but not CE, since healthy controls from Japan showed no such positive reactivity.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Both authors contributed equally to the work.

View full text