ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Data & Knowledge Engineering
Volume 58, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages 358-380
Including the special issue : ER 2004
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (376 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.datak.2005.07.007    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice?

Islay Daviesa, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Peter Greenb, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Michael Rosemanna, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Marta Indulskab, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Stan Gallob, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aFaculty of Information Technology, Queensland University of Technology, 126 Margaret Street, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia bUQ Business School, University of Queensland Ipswich, 4305, Australia

Available online 25 July 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Much research has been devoted over the years to investigating and advancing the techniques and tools used by analysts when they model. As opposed to what academics, software providers and their resellers promote as should be happening, the aim of this research was to determine whether practitioners still embraced conceptual modeling seriously. In addition, what are the most popular techniques and tools used for conceptual modeling? What are the major purposes for which conceptual modeling is used? The study found that the top six most frequently used modeling techniques and methods were ER diagramming, data flow diagramming, systems flowcharting, workflow modeling, UML, and structured charts. Modeling technique use was found to decrease significantly from smaller to medium-sized organizations, but then to increase significantly in larger organizations (proxying for large, complex projects). Technique use was also found to significantly follow an inverted U-shaped curve, contrary to some prior explanations. Additionally, an important contribution of this study was the identification of the factors that uniquely influence the decision of analysts to continue to use modeling, viz., communication (using diagrams) to/from stakeholders, internal knowledge (lack of) of techniques, user expectations management, understanding models’ integration into the business, and tool/software deficiencies. The highest ranked purposes for which modeling was undertaken were database design and management, business process documentation, business process improvement, and software development.

Keywords: Conceptual modeling; Business systems analysis; Modeling techniques; Modeling tools; Project size; Modeler experience

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Background and hypotheses
2.1. Organization size
2.2. Years of modeling experience
3. Methodology
3.1. Step 1 of the analysis of problems and benefits—Nvivo 2
3.2. Step 2 of the analysis of problems and benefits—Leximancer
4. Survey results and discussion
5. Textual analysis results and discussion
5.1. Internal knowledge (lack of) of techniques
5.2. User expectations management
5.3. Understanding the models integration into the business
5.4. Tool/software deficiencies
5.5. Communication (using diagrams) to/from stakeholders
6. Conclusions and future work
Appendix A. Which of these modelling techniques do you use?
References
Vitae




Data & Knowledge Engineering
Volume 58, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages 358-380
Including the special issue : ER 2004
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.