ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Discrete Applied Mathematics
Volume 150, Issues 1-3, 1 September 2005, Pages 251-255
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (165 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.dam.2004.09.020    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Note

Note on: N.E. Aguilera, M.S. Escalante, G.L. Nasini, “The disjunctive procedure and blocker duality”star, open

V. Leonia, b, E-mail The Corresponding Author and G. Nasinia, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aUNR, Depto. de Matemática, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Ingeniería y Agrimensura, Av. Pellegrini 250, 2000 Rosario, Argentina bFundación Antorchas

Received 20 May 2003; 
revised 12 May 2004; 
accepted 2 September 2004. 
Available online 27 April 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Aguilera et al. [Discrete Appl. Math. 121 (2002) 1–13] give a generalization of a theorem of Lehman through an extension View the MathML source of the disjunctive procedure defined by Balas, Ceria and Cornuéjols. This generalization can be formulated as

(A) For every clutter View the MathML source, the disjunctive index of its set covering polyhedron View the MathML source coincides with the disjunctive index of the set covering polyhedron of its blocker, View the MathML source.

In Aguilera et al. [Discrete Appl. Math. 121 (2002) 1–3], (A) is indeed a corollary of the stronger result

(B) View the MathML source.

Motivated by the work of Gerards et al. [Math. Oper. Res. 28 (2003) 884–885] we propose a simpler proof of (B) as well as an alternative proof of (A), independent of (B). Both of them are based on the relationship between the “disjunctive relaxations” obtained by View the MathML source and the set covering polyhedra associated with some particular minors of View the MathML source.

Keywords: Disjunctive procedure; Blocking type polyhedra; Blocker duality; Clutter

Article Outline

References

Discrete Applied Mathematics
Volume 150, Issues 1-3, 1 September 2005, Pages 251-255
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.