State, Federal, and Industry Efforts at Paratuberculosis Control

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2011.07.010Get rights and content

Section snippets

National Regulations

The USDA has a long history of regulatory control of paratuberculosis. As early as 1952, the Secretary of Agriculture issued a notice that paratuberculosis existed in Puerto Rico and in each state of the continental United States, except Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Utah, and Wyoming.5 Since then, various regulations have been implemented to control the national spread of JD, but none have been effective; JD is now considered to exist in all areas of the United States.

In April 2000,

Current National Program

The VBJDCP is a cooperative program administered by state animal health agencies and supported by industry and federal agencies. The program consists of 3 basic elements: (1) education, (2) management, and (3) herd testing and classification.

Most states have adopted the national program as is, while others have included the VBJDCP as part of a larger quality assurance/cattle health program, providing a broader approach to disease prevention and management issues on premises. This format is a

State Efforts

While the program remains voluntary at the state and producer level, the VBJDCP provides the standard for which all state programs are operated in order to provide a level of consistency between states. To make the best use of state infrastructure and to match the needs of the cattle industry of the state, various states have implemented the program in different ways. The most active states (in terms of testing and enrolled herds) are Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Industry Initiatives

Industry remains a key partner in outreach effort to producers. Beef organizations have been providing Johne's information to members but had limited interaction with state activities. For the dairy industry, organizations such as cooperatives and producer and breed associations function primarily as a conduit for information to their members. The current economic downturn had caused several organizations to focus their efforts on short-term economic issues rather than targeting longer-term

Summary

Over the past decade, the cattle industry, state animal health agencies and USDA APHIS have invested significant resources for education and outreach to producers and to the control of JD. This effort has resulted in the successful development of a strong infrastructure to support the program in many states, including the critical components of laboratory capacity and trained veterinarians to conduct risk assessments and design effective management plans on cattle operations. However, the key

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (23)

  • Johne's disease on U.S. dairy operations

    (1997)
  • Part III: Reference of 1997 beef cow-calf production management and disease control

    (1998)
  • Johne's disease on U.S. dairies, 1991–2007

    (2008)
  • Dairy 2007, part V: changes in dairy cattle health and management practices in the United States, 1996–2007

    (2009)
  • Department of Agriculture, Office of the Secretary, brucellosis and paratuberculosis: notice regarding contagion of communicable diseaseFederal Register

  • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 9 CFR 71 and 80: Johne's disease in domestic livestock; interstate movementFederal Register

  • D. Whipple

    National Paratuberculosis Certification Program

  • L.L. Bulga

    U.S. voluntary Johne's disease herd status program for cattle

  • Uniform program standards for the voluntary bovine Johne's Disease Control Program

    (2002)
  • Uniform program standards for the voluntary bovine Johne's Disease Control Program

    (2010)
  • National Johne's Disease Demonstration Herd Project

    (2005)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Genome-wide association analysis for susceptibility to infection by Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in US Holsteins

      2022, Journal of Dairy Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The disease occurs worldwide in dairy cattle and other ruminants. Control programs for paratuberculosis have been established in some nations including Australia (Kennedy and Allworth, 2000), Norway (Tharaldsen et al., 2003), Iceland (Gunnarsson et al., 2003), Japan (Momotani, 2012), the Netherlands (Groenendaal et al., 2003), and the United States (Carter, 2011). Recent estimates suggest that 68% of US dairy herds (National Animal Health Monitoring System, 2008) and 7.9% of US beef herds have infected animals (Dargatz et al., 2001).

    • The genetic architecture of milk ELISA scores as an indicator of Johne's disease (paratuberculosis) in dairy cattle

      2018, Journal of Dairy Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      No effective treatment for JD is currently available (Attalla et al., 2010). Johne's disease control programs, or voluntary pilot programs, have been implemented in various countries including Australia, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, the United Kingdom, and the United States (Kennedy and Allworth, 2000; Groenendaal et al., 2003; Gunnarsson et al., 2003; Tharaldsen et al., 2003; Carter, 2011; Momotani, 2012; Geraghty et al., 2014; Garcia and Shalloo, 2015; Pieper et al., 2015). However, diagnosis of JD is difficult due to its long subclinical incubation period and the lack of sensitive diagnostic tests (Nielsen, 2008).

    • A review of bovine Johne's disease control activities in 6 endemically infected countries

      2014, Preventive Veterinary Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The level of producer engagement can increase from education to management and finally to herd testing/classification. Each state programme has a Designated Johne's Coordinator to facilitate activities (USDA-APHIS-VS, 2010; Carter, 2011). ‘Low risk’ herds are considered unlikely to contain infected cattle (with variable confidence in prevalence being below a variable cut-off).

    The author has nothing to disclose.

    View full text