ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Volume 13, Issue 1, February 2007, Pages 4-14
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (432 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2006.08.002    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

An experimental study comparing the effects of combined transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation and electromagnetic millimeter waves for spinal pain in Hong Kong

Y.B. YipCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Hing-Min Sonny Tsea and Ka Kalina Wua

aSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, PR China

Available online 18 October 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Summary

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of combined transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation (TAES) and electromagnetic millimeter wave (EMMW) therapy as an add-on treatment for pain relief and physical functional activity enhancement among adults with sub-acute non-specific spinal pain in either the low back or neck.

Design

A non-blinded study with data obtained before, immediate, one week and three months after intervention.

Setting

The Telehealth Clinic and Community Centre, Hong Kong.

Participants

Forty-seven subjects with either sub-acute neck or low back pain.

Intervention

Subjects were randomly allocated to either an intervention group (n=23) or a control group (n=24). These groups were then divided into subgroups according to the site of their spinal pain—neck or back. The intervention group had eight treatments over a three-week period of TAES and EMMW.

Outcome measures

Changes from baseline to the end of treatment were assessed at intervals of one week and three months on either neck or low back pain intensity [by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)]; stiffness level; stress level; neck or low back lateral flexion and forward flexion in cm, and interference with daily activities.

Results

The baseline VAS scores for the intervention and control groups were 5.34 and 5.18 out of 10, respectively (P value=0.77). At the one week and three month assessments, there were no significant differences between the groups—VAS (P value=0.09 and 0.27, respectively). A further subgroup of chronic pain sufferers (n=31) was identified and these had significantly reduced pain intensity at the one week assessment (P value=0.04) but this was not sustained at post three months after treatment (P value=0.15). Improvements in stiffness level, stress level, and functional disability level in the intervention group were not significant.

Conclusions

Our study shows that there was a reduction in pain intensity, stress and stiffness level immediately after the eight sessions of treatment (TAES and EMMW), though the effect is not sustained after a week. No pain relief was found with the neck pain subgroup. However, the reduction in subjective average pain intensity among the chronic pain subgroup was sustained at the post one week assessment for the intervention group but not at the post three month assessment.

Keywords: Electromagnetic millimetre waves; Low back pain; Neck pain; Pain relief; Transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation

Article Outline

Introduction
Methods
Study design and participants
Data collection procedures
Outcome measures
Primary outcome measure
Secondary outcome measures
Data analysis
Results
Enrolment, group allocation and follow-up
Subject characteristics
VAS determination of pain relief at the post-one week follow-up
Secondary outcomes
Participants’ satisfaction with TAES and EMMW therapy
Discussion
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References





 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.