ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Volume 12, Issue 1, February 2006, Pages 40-47
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (169 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.09.003    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

An exploratory study of complementary and alternative medicine in hospital midwifery: Models of care and professional strugglestar, open

Jon Adamsa, b, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (CCEB), Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Level 3, David Maddison Building, Royal Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle 2300, NSW, Australia bQualitative Research Laboratory, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Australia

Available online 22 December 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Summary

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasingly popular amongst midwives in Australia. A growing number of hospital midwives are personally integrating one or a range of CAM within their midwifery practice.

Despite this trend we still know little about CAM in midwifery, particularly at a grass-roots level. This paper reports findings from one section of a larger exploratory study examining grass-root practitioners’ understandings and experiences of complementary therapies in nursing and midwifery.

Thirteen in-depth interviews were conducted with midwives working in New South Wales public hospitals and currently integrating CAM within their general midwifery practice. Analysis illustrates how midwives’ explanations of, and affinity claims regarding, CAM feed into wider ongoing issues relating to professional autonomy and the relationship between midwifery and obstetrics.

Keywords: Hospital midwifery; Complementary and alternative medicine; Obstetrics; Professional struggle; Professional autonomy; Models of care; Professions

Article Outline

Introduction
The context and location of hospital midwifery
CAM in midwifery: towards studies in social context
Methods
Analysis
Midwifery and obstetrics: contrasting viewpoints of care
Positioning CAM in the midwifery paradigm: affinity claims
CAM as threat to obstetrics: professional self interest and hospital hierarchy
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.