ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (409 K)

Article Toolbox
  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.csda.2005.04.008    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Errors in discrimination with monotone missing data from multivariate normal populations

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

A. Batsidis, K. ZografosCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and S. Loukas

Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece


Received 27 March 2004; 
revised 3 December 2004; 
accepted 11 April 2005. 
Available online 10 May 2005.

Abstract

The behavior of the linear discriminant function is studied, when it is used for the classification of an observation X into one of two independent multivariate normal populations Np(μ(ν),Σ), with distinct mean vectors μ(ν), ν=1,2 and a common covariance matrix Σ. The effect of the estimation of the parameters, on the basis of random 2-step monotone training samples, is studied, in three stages of increasing complexity. Asymptotic expressions for the distribution functions of the probabilities of misclassification are derived. Moreover, numerical and simulation results are presented in order to study the effect to the distribution of the probabilities of misclassification using different estimation procedures and missingness rate in the data. Two extensions, related to the case of k-step monotone missing training samples and the case of completely unknown heteroscedastic normal populations are also discussed.

Keywords: Monotone missing data; Discriminant analysis; Errors of misclassification; Distribution of errors

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Preliminaries
3. Main results
3.1. The parameter μ(2) unknown
3.1.1. Distribution of View the MathML source
3.1.2. Distribution of View the MathML source
3.2. The parameters μ(1) and μ(2) unknown
3.3. All the parameters unknown
4. Numerical results
4.1. Effectiveness of case-wise deletion method
4.1.1. The parameter μ(2) unknown
4.1.2. The parameters μ(1) and μ(2) unknown
4.1.3. All the parameters unknown
4.2. Effectiveness of the missingness rate
4.2.1. The parameter μ(2) unknown
4.2.2. The parameters μ(1) and μ(2) unknown
4.2.3. All the parameters unknown
4.3. Effectiveness of simulation technique
4.3.1. The parameter μ(2) unknown
4.3.2. The parameters μ(1) and μ(2) unknown
4.3.3. All the parameters unknown
4.4. Summary of numerical results
5. Concluding remarks and extensions
Acknowledgements
References








Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +30 26510 98257; fax: +30 26510 98207.

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.