ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Volume 50, Issue 5, 1 March 2006, Pages 1188-1205
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (305 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.12.005    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

A hybrid EM approach to spatial clustering

Tianming HuCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Sam Yuan Sung

Department of Computer Science, National University of Singapore, Mailbox 327, 05-08, Blk S16, Singapore 117543, Singapore

Received 26 April 2004; 
revised 14 December 2004; 
accepted 14 December 2004. 
Available online 7 January 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Spatial clustering requires consideration of spatial information and this makes expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm that maximizes likelihood alone inappropriate. Although neighborhood EM (NEM) algorithm incorporates a spatial penalty term, it needs much more iterations for E-step. To incorporate spatial information while avoiding much additional computation, we propose a hybrid EM (HEM) approach that combines EM and NEM. Early training is performed via a selective hard EM till the penalized likelihood criterion begins to decrease. Then training is turned to NEM, which runs only one iteration of E-step and plays a role of finer tuning. Thus spatial information is incorporated throughout HEM and the computational complexity is also comparable to EM. Empirical results show that a few more passes are needed in HEM to converge after switching to NEM and the final clustering quality is close to or slightly better than standard NEM.

Keywords: Expectation-maximization algorithm; Spatial clustering; Gaussian mixture; Spatial penalty term

Article Outline

1. Introduction
1.1. Problem formulation
1.2. Related work
2. Basics of EM and NEM
2.1. Original EM
2.2. Entropy-based view
2.3. Neighborhood EM
2.3.1. Softmax function
3. Hybrid EM
3.1. Selective hardening
3.2. M-step implementation for fixing option
4. Experimental evaluation
4.1. Performance criteria
4.2. Satimage data
4.3. House price data
4.4. Bacteria image
5. Conclusion
References






 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.