ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Clinical Radiology
Volume 60, Issue 2, February 2005, Pages 251-256
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (187 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
doi:10.1016/j.crad.2004.02.013    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Radiologists Published by Elsevier Ltd.

CT herniography in the diagnosis of occult groin hernias

V. MarkosCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and E.F. Brown

Department of Radiology, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK


Received 18 February 2004; 
accepted 26 February 2004. 
Available online 19 January 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

AIM

To evaluate the role of computed tomography (CT) after herniography in the diagnosis and management of primary and recurrent groin hernias not detectable on clinical examination.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients underwent CT post-herniography over a 6-year period for suspected primary or recurrent inguinal hernia. The herniography and post-herniography CT findings were retrospectively compared with clinical and surgical follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the role of herniography and CT post-herniography in the primary and recurrent groups.

RESULTS

Of the 51 patients investigated for occult inguinal hernia, 19 had previous hernia repair with possible recurrence. The most common symptom at presentation was groin pain or discomfort (84%). Seventy-five percent in the primary group and 84% in the recurrent group had no findings on herniography or CT. Nine percent in the primary group and 16% in the recurrent group had hernias diagnosed by herniography. CT did not enhance the detection of hernia. Sensitivity for herniography and CT herniography in the primary groin hernia group was 75% as against specificity, which was 100 and 90%, respectively. For the recurrent groin hernias, sensitivity was 60% for herniography and 40% for CT herniography and specificity 100% for both.

CONCLUSION

CT performed post-herniography did not provide any benefit over performing herniography alone in the diagnosis of occult primary or recurrent inguinal hernias.

Keywords: Computed tomography (CT); Hernia; Groin; Abdominal wall

Article Outline

Introduction
Materials and methods
Technique
Herniography
CT Herniography
Results
Statistical analysis
Primary groin hernias
Recurrent groin hernia
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References




Clinical Radiology
Volume 60, Issue 2, February 2005, Pages 251-256
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.