Clinical Research in Head and Neck Reconstruction
Section snippets
Methodologic challenges in surgical trials
- 1.
Surgeons learn how to do things better with time. Given that a learning curve exists for surgical procedures, the number of procedures performed by a surgeon needs to be considered before beginning a randomized controlled trial.
- 2.
Surgical skills differ among surgeons. There are implications of differences between surgeons in their expertise in performing different surgeries. It may be that only the best surgeons should be involved in a trial comparing procedures, and they should be allowed to
Study designs
In simplistic terms, the two main groups of epidemiologic studies are observational and interventions. In both groups, studies can be descriptive or analytic. The main difference is that observation studies identify associations, while analytical studies explore causal relationships. Table 1 depicts the study types that fall within this framework.
True randomized prospective trials (Level I evidence, also termed randomized, controlled trials or RCT) are infrequent in head and neck surgery, and
Cohort studies
Numerous series have been published reviewing surgical options and the outcomes of reconstructive procedures for soft tissue and bony defects in the head and neck after ablation. Some series deal with the retrospective, cross-sectional review of certain types of defects and reconstruction [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. For example, Said and colleagues [15] reported on the results of bilobed free osteocutaneous fibula flaps for through-and-through oromandibular defects. The limitations in this
Quality-of-life studies
Surgical treatment always aims to improve the quality of life (QOL) by improving function or form, to reduce troublesome symptoms such as pain, and to improve the overall sense of well-being. Sometimes surgery succeeds in prolonging life by eradicating a disease, but where symptoms dominate the patient's experience, the priority becomes relief of these symptoms where it can be achieved.
Head and neck cancers rank among the most debilitating maladies known, affecting key contributors to a
Quality-of-life instruments
The concept of “health-related quality of life,” although intuitive, is nevertheless elusive. What would be “good” quality of life for one person might be “poor” quality for another. Because this cannot be standardized in an absolute sense, the work in this area accepts that the individual patient defines what their own quality of life is from their own perspective. This perspective can be assessed by general or global measures that look at the patient's overall satisfaction with the state of
Problems and cautions in head and neck surgery quality-of-life studies
Progress in QOL studies in head and neck cancer surgery are hampered by a number of potential problems. The significance of this depends on the question that the study hopes to answer. For instance, for some questions, only a few patients might be required. The following is a list of limitations in head and neck surgery studies:
- 1.
Lack of a uniformly accepted score or system, which would describe the extent of the anatomical defect and physiologic disruption resulting from the various resections.
Possible solutions to the head and neck quality of life problems
- 1.
Multicenter studies may help overcome the few patients available in any one center. This will be expensive, as it requires an infrastructure to be developed for any trial. Once the pattern is established, subsequent studies should be easier. Another alternative is to provide the raw demographic and staging data, as well as QOL domain scores, in case series publications, so that meta-analysis can eventually be performed.
- 2.
Trials should be designed with QOL outcomes as the primary measure. The
References (61)
Surgical research or comic opera: questions but few answers
Lancet
(1996)- et al.
Methodologic standards in surgical trials
Surgery
(1996) - et al.
Combined postoperative radiotherapy and weekly cisplatin infusion for locally advanced head and neck carcinoma: final report of a randomized trial
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1996) - et al.
Postoperative concomitant irradiation and chemotherapy with mitomycin C and bleomycin for advanced head-and-neck carcinoma
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2003) - et al.
Patterns of failure in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated postoperatively with irradiation or concomitant irradiation with Mitomycin C and Bleomycin
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2007) - et al.
Functional comparison after reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap or a pectoralis major flap for cancer of the tongue
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(2003) Innovation in surgery
Am J Surg
(2002)- et al.
A comparison between the University of Washington Head and Neck Disease-Specific Measure and the Medical Short Form 36, EORTC QOQ-C33 and EORTC Head and Neck 35
Oral Oncol
(1998) - et al.
Health-related quality of life and clinical function after primary surgery for oral cancer
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2002) - et al.
Clinical function after primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: an 11-item examination
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2002)
The principles behind the tactics of performing therapeutic trials
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
BMJ
Dextran-related complications in head and neck microsurgery: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A prospective randomized analysis
Plast Reconstr Surg
Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advance head and neck cancer
N Engl J Med
Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck
N Engl J Med
Postoperative chemoradiotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Head Neck
Functional outcomes after surgical reconstruction of the base of tongue using the radial forearm free flap in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma
Head Neck
Disease control, survival and functional outcome after multimodal treatment for advanced-stage tongue base cancer
Head Neck
Bilobed fibula flap for reconstruction of through-and-through oromandibular defects
Head Neck
Prognosis as a determinant of free flap utilization for reconstruction of the lateral mandibular defect
Head Neck
Functional outcomes and donor site morbidity following circumferential pharyngoesophageal reconstruction using an anterolateral thigh flap and salivary bypass tube
Head Neck
Fixation of mandibular osteotomies: comparison of locking and nonlocking hardware
Head Neck
Scapula osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: impact of flap choice on surgical and medical complications
Head Neck
Health-technology assessment in surgery
Lancet
Speech outcomes in Cantonese patients after glossectomy
Head Neck
Speech intelligibility after glossectomy and speech rehabilitation
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Transoral reconstruction of the mobile tongue, using radial forearm free flap
Microsurgery
Fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction of the tongue and floor of month
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Swallowing after major surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx: a prospective and longitudinal assessment of patients treated by microvaxcular soft tissue reconstruction
Head Neck
Cited by (1)
Comentario al trabajo "Protocolo quirúrgico en la reconstrucción de la parálisis facial: nuestra experiencia tras 140 casos tratados"
2008, Cirugia Plastica Ibero-Latinoamericana