Elsevier

Chemical Physics Letters

Volume 642, 1 December 2015, Pages 39-42
Chemical Physics Letters

Experimental and theoretical study on cation–π interaction of the univalent thallium cation with [2.2.2]paracyclophane

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2015.10.074Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry was used for characterization of cation–π interaction.

  • Cation Tl+ forms with [2.2.2]paracyclophane (C24H24) the complex [Tl(C24H24)]+.

  • By employing DFT calculations, the most probable structure of the proven cation–π complex [Tl(C24H24)]+ was predicted.

Abstract

By using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), it was proven experimentally that the univalent thallium cation (Tl+) forms with [2.2.2]paracyclophane (C24H24) the cationic complex species [Tl(C24H24)]+. Further, employing quantum mechanical DFT calculations, the most probable structure of the [Tl(C24H24)]+ complex was derived. In the resulting complex with a symmetry very close to C3, the ‘central’ cation Tl+ is bound by six bonding interactions to six carbon atoms from the three benzene rings of the parent [2.2.2]paracyclophane ligand via cation–π interaction.

Section snippets

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Grant Agency of Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Project No.: 42900/1312/3114, ‘Environmental Aspects of Sustainable Development of Society’, and by the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports (Project MSMT No.: 20/2015). The authors of this study thank Prof. Jaroslav Kvíčala from Prague for some theoretical calculations.

References (32)

  • N. Zacharias et al.

    Trends Pharm. Sci.

    (2002)
  • C. Janiak

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (1997)
  • J.L. Atwood et al.
    (1996)
  • F. Vögtle et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (1997)
  • J.L. Pierre et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1981)
  • J. Gross et al.

    Chem. Eur. J.

    (1996)
  • E.G. Buchanan et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (2013)
  • D.A. Dougherty

    Science

    (1996)
  • J.C. Ma et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (1997)
  • K.S. Kim et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2000)
  • G.W. Gokel

    Chem. Commun.

    (2003)
  • D. Schröder et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1998)
  • A. Gapeev et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. A

    (2000)
  • S. Tsuzuki et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. A

    (2001)
  • H. Huang et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. A

    (2002)
  • Y. Mo et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Solvent extraction of europium(III) trifluoromethanesulfonate into nitrobenzene by using [2.2.2]paracyclophane – Experimental and theoretical study

      2021, Journal of Molecular Liquids
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, the binding energy of trivalent cation Eu3+ with [2.2.2]paracyclophane is much higher than that of univalent cations. We can add that the soft univalent cations Ag+ and Tl+ interact with [2.2.2]paracyclophane differently than both, alkali metal cations and Eu3+ [7,8]. While these cations are located in the center of the [2.2.2]paracyclophane cavity, Ag+ and Tl+ cations are located out off plane of ligand cavity, similarly as Sn(II) and Ge(II) [23].

    • Interaction of the lithium cation with [2.2.2]paracyclophane: Experimental and theoretical study

      2021, Journal of Molecular Structure
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently, the first-principles model of Fermi resonance in the alkyl CH stretch region has been applied to 1,2-diphenylethane and [2.2.2]paracyclophane [12]. We must emphasize that the cation-π interactions of [2.2.2]paracyclophane (C24H24; see Fig. 1) with the “soft” cations Ag+ [9,10,13] and Tl+ [14] have been investigated. In our previous works, we dealt with the reaction of Na+, K+, Rb+ and Cs+and [2.2.2]paracyclophane in the gas phase [15–18].

    • Experimental and theoretical study on cation-π interaction of the univalent silver cation with pyrene in the gas phase and in the solid state

      2018, Inorganica Chimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, the interaction energies, E(int), of the found conformers A, B, C, D, and E belonging to the complexes [Ag(C16H10)]+ and [Ag(C16H10)2]+, involving the 7-point corrections for the basis set superposition error (BSSE) [58,59], are reviewed in Table 1. At this point it should be stated that the interaction energies corresponding to the complexes [2.2.2]paracyclophane – Tl+ (i.e., [Tl(C24H24)]+) and [2.2.2]paracyclophane – Ag+ (i.e., [Ag(C24H24)]+) in the gas phase are −198.1 and −361.2 kJ/mol, respectively, as evaluated recently [60,61]. From comparison of the previous values with the data given in Table 1, it follows that in the gas phase, the stabilities of the conformers A, B, and C are roughly comparable with that of the [Tl(C24H24)]+ complex, whereas the interaction energies of the remaining conformers D and E are nearly comparable with that of [Ag(C24H24)]+.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text