Elsevier

Chemical Physics Letters

Volumes 539–540, 29 June 2012, Pages 157-162
Chemical Physics Letters

Phase separation in crowded micro-spheroids: DNA–PEG system

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2012.05.033Get rights and content

Abstract

Living cells are characterized as micro-vesicles encapsulating highly crowded macromolecular media, including DNA. To probe the intrinsic property of such crowded systems in a micro-closed environment, we observed a mixture of DNA and hydrophilic polymer, PEG within an aqueous micro-spheroid. It was found that the mixture causes phase-segregation by depositing DNA near the spheroid surface, whereas corresponding bulk solution sustains isotropic phase. After the phase segregation, DNA molecules in the condensed phase exhibit time evolution to an ordered state. This surface-mediated segregation is discussed in terms of the depletion effect under micro-confinement.

Highlights

► Homogeneous bulk mixture of DNA–PEG phase separates in an aqueous micro-spheroid. ► DNA molecules accumulate near the droplet surface and make liquid crystalline ordering. ► Phase-separation process is slowed down with increase of droplet size. ► We explain it as enhancement of depletion force under confinement due to surface effects.

Introduction

Living cells maintain their lives under highly concentrated conditions of macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids along with other small molecules [1]. As for an example, in Escherichia coli, typical total mass density of protein and nucleic acid within the cytoplasm is ca. 220 mg/ml, indicating highly crowded condition [2]. In contrast, most of the biochemical and biophysical studies on the reaction mechanisms, kinetics and thermodynamics of proteins and nucleic acids have been carried out in vitro using dilute aqueous solutions of purified biopolymer constituents [3]. Thus, it is of considerable importance to examine how DNA molecules behave in a crowded solution of a confined cell-sized space ranging ∼1–100 μm. As a typical manifestation of crowding effect with macromolecules, we may consider the general tendency of de-mixing, or phase-segregation, due to an entropic interaction, i.e. depletion effect [4], [5].

It is well known that DNA condenses in the presence of hydrophilic polymer and salt such as NaCl and KCl [6] which is called polymer salt induced (psi) condensation [7], [8]. The hydrophilic solvable polymer, polyethylene–glycol (PEG) has been frequently adapted for the study of psi condensation [9], [10]. It has been revealed that single long DNA molecules undergo discrete transition between elongated coil and compact globule state in the presence of PEG and salt [11]. Whereas in concentrated DNA solutions with PEG, DNA chains tend to take elongated conformation by aligning parallel to each other, being similar to liquid crystal structures [12].

In the present Letter, we focus our attention on the change of the state of DNA molecules under crowded condition under confinement to micrometer length scales. We adapted the experimental system of a cell-sized droplet entrapping DNA and PEG. In order to make the experimental conditions to be simpler, we studied relatively short DNA molecules (300–700 bps) which behave as elastic rods. We show that phase-segregation is generated in a confined environment for the macromolecular solution, whereas segregation is not caused in the bulk solution, under the same composition of the solution. This initial study is a first step towards understanding of phase segregation of macromolecular solutions under confinement.

In relation to the specific effect of confinement on the segregation of DNA in a crowded micro-environment, it may of interest to note that condensed part of genomic DNA, i.e., heterochromatin, is often localized underneath the nuclear membrane, suggesting the similar effect as was observed in the present Letter [13], [14].

Section snippets

Experimental details

Salmon sperm DNA (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Japan) was dissolved in Milli-Q water at 10 mg/mL, and then probe sonicator was applied for 5 min on ice. After PCI (Phenol–Chloroform Isoamyl alcohol) method, centrifuging with isopropyl alcohol was done. Finally, the DNA was dissolved in TE buffer (mixture of Tris–HCl pH 8.0 and EDTA; Nippon Gene, Japan) to get the stock solution. The specification of the stock was checked by gel-electrophoresis as peak ∼500 bp (range ∼300–700 bp). The persistence

Results

Figure 1 shows the schematic representation of the experimental system, revealing the manner of phase-segregation with time. Large droplets of diameters 50–122 μm are useful for time lapse observation since larger droplets sink slowly onto the glass substrate to be fixed. We captured images for the droplets located on the lower glass slide by focusing on the intersecting plane parallel to the glass slide. For such droplets situated on the glass surface, we could obtain well-resolved pictures. It

Discussions

The most remarkable result in our experiments is that a DNA–PEG–NaCl solution, which is stable in bulk (this stability of bulk mixture is also confirmed from the initial homogeneous condition of the droplets), phase segregates within ∼h when confined in droplets of diameter ∼50 μm to ∼122 μm, depending on the droplet size and being a little bit slower for the larger droplets as exemplified in Figure 4. In other words, depletion interaction is enhanced in confinement under micrometer length

Conclusions

We found that, in a cell-sized droplet, characteristic phase-segregation is caused for the DNA solution crowded with PEG whereas the solution remains isotropic in bulk phase under the same composition. DNA molecules condense at the droplet boundary and gradually form an ordered phase. We also found that both phase segregation and ordering are slowed down as the droplet size is increased. We thus expect that the significant kinetic effect on the polymer solution may stimulate the further study

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported under Bilateral International Exchange Programme (BIEP) of Global Center of Excellence (GCOE), Kyoto University. Author N.B. thanks Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, and Director, SINP for awarding her research fellowship. K.Y. is financially supported by KAKENHI (Grant No. 18GS0421) from JSPS.

References (35)

  • D. Miyoshi et al.

    Biochimie

    (2008)
  • A.A. Zinchenko et al.

    Biophys. J.

    (2005)
  • V.A. Bloomfield

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (1996)
  • Y.M. Evdokimov et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1972)
  • H. Walter et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1995)
  • R.J. Ellis

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (2001)
  • R. Hancock

    Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.

    (2007)
  • Y. Ichiba et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1998)
  • M.C. Konopka et al.

    J. Bacteriol.

    (2006)
  • S.B. Zimmerman et al.

    Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.

    (1993)
  • S. Asakura et al.

    J. Polym. Sci.

    (1958)
  • M. Adams et al.

    Nature

    (1998)
  • V.A. Bloomfield

    Biopolymers

    (1991)
  • Y.M. Evdokimov et al.

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (1976)
  • V.V. Vasilevskaya et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1995)
  • M. Kojima et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (2006)
  • J. Ellenberg et al.

    J. Cell. Biol.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (65)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text