doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.047
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
An investigation of soft-core potentials for the simulation of mesogenic molecules and molecules composed of rigid and flexible segments
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Zak E. Hughesa, Lorna M. Stimsonb, c, Henk Slima, Juho S. Lintuvuoria, Jaroslav M. Ilnytskyid and Mark R. Wilsona,
, 
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
bBiophysics and Statistical Mechanics Group, Department of Applied Maths, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street North, London (ON), Canada
cLaboratory of Physics, Helsinki University of Technology, P.O. Box 9203, Espoo 02170, Finland
dInstitute for Condensed Matter Physics, Nat. Acad. Sci. of Ukraine, 1 Svientsitskii Street, 79011 Lviv, Ukraine
Received 5 September 2007;
revised 21 December 2007;
accepted 16 January 2008.
Available online 2 February 2008.
Abstract
The phase behaviour of three soft core spherocylinder models is investigated with a view to producing an effective potential for use in coarse-grained simulations of liquid crystal phases and polymers composed of rigid and flexible segments. Provided potentials are not made too soft, two of the soft core models are found to work well in terms of successfully reproducing mesophases and in providing considerable improvements in computational speed over other commonly used coarse-grained models. In Monte Carlo simulations a soft-core spherocylinder model in which a cut and shifted Lennard–Jones potential is truncated with a linear tangential potential is found to be particularly effective; while for molecular dynamics a better model is provided by a DPD-like quadratic potential. Here, computational speed-ups of 20–30× are seen in equilibration times in comparison to the well-known soft repulsive spherocylinder (SRS) model. The quadratic potential is used in an additional set of coarse-grained simulations of a liquid crystal with a flexible chain, which exhibits spontaneous formation of a nematic phase. The use of different types of interaction sites is also illustrated by the simulation of a spherocylinder with two “tails” formed from spheres. Here, varying the hardness of the sphere-spherocylinder interaction potential allows the formation of a smectic-A phase which exhibits microphase separation.
Keywords: Liquid crystals; Spherocylinder; Soft-core potential; Molecular dynamics; Monte Carlo; Phase diagram; Phase transition
PACS classification codes: 07.05.Tp; 02.70.Ns; 61.30.-v; 64.70.M-
Fig. 1. Dotted line—SRS potential. Bold line—tangential potential. Dot/dashed line—quadratic potential. Dashed line—perturbed potential. The soft core potentials are each shown for a value of Umax/
=10.
Fig. 3. Snapshots from the tangential potential L/D=5.0 spherocylinder system showing isotropic (T*=1.0, p=1.0, top) and nematic ((T*=1.0, p=1.325, bottom) phase behaviour.
Fig. 4. Growth of a nematic phase from an isotropic liquid. Top: using Monte Carlo simulation for the four potentials studied. Bottom: using molecular dynamics for the SRS and quadratic potentials. Calculations are carried out for T*=1.0 in the constant–NpT ensemble at state points corresponding to an approximate nematic order parameter of
S2=0.79
, with p*=1.4, ρ*=0.098 (SRS potential), p*=1.5, ρ*=0.137, (Uquad/
)max=35 (quadratic potential), p*=1.325, ρ*=0.125, (Utan/
)max=10 (tangential potential), p*=1.4, ρ*=0.168, (Upert/
)max=4 (perturbed potential).
Fig. 5. The radial distribution function, g(r), plotted for the quadratic potential for three values of (Uquad/
)max corresponding to state points with an order parameter of
S2
≈0.79–0.8.
Fig. 6. Top: order parameter as a function of reduced density for a spherocylinder with a 4-atom single chain attached (composite model A). Bottom: snapshot from the nematic phase.
Fig. 7. Top: order parameter as a function of reduced density for a spherocylinder with twin 3-atom chains attached (composite model B). Bottom: snapshot from a smectic-A phase showing microphase separation within the phase.
Table 1.
Parameters used in the definition of composite model A
a Bonded to the end of the spherocylinder line segment.
b Moment of inertia of spherocylinder.
Table 2.
Parameters used in the definition of composite model B
a Bonded to the centre of the spherocylinder.
b Moment of inertia of spherocylinder.

Corresponding author.