doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2004.06.004
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Numerical solution of a reduced model of collisionless magnetic reconnection in two and three dimensions
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
D. Grasso
,
, a, D. Borgognoa, F. Califanob, D. Farinac, F. Pegorarob and F. Porcellia
a Burning Plasma Research Group, INFM, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
b Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pisa, INFM, Italy
c Istituto di Fisica del Plasma, CNR, EURATOM-ENEA-CNR Assoc., Milano, Italy
Available online 23 July 2004.
Abstract
Magnetic reconnection in collisionless regime is investigated in two- and three-dimensional configurations. In the framework of two-dimensional configurations some recent results concerning the difference between dissipative and collisionless reconnection are reviewed. The results of numerical simulation of three-dimensional configurations are presented and analyzed.
52.35.P; 47.65.+a; 94.30.Gm; 52.65
Fig. 1. Contour plots of the G+ field (top frames) at two different simulation times, show the phase mixing and the filamentation, typical of collisionless reconnection. The formation of small scale is also evident in the contour plots of the current density and vorticity (bottom frames). Superimposed to each plot is the magnetic island.
Fig. 2. The time derivative of log∫|Jm,n(x,t)| dx at the rational surface, are plotted. The second order modes grow, according to quasi linear theory, with rates equal to two times the growth rate of the first order mode (1,1).
Fig. 3. Current density profiles at different simulation times. During the linear phase (top panels) the current density peaks are localized at the rational surfaces defined by Eq. (5). In the nonlinear phase (bottom panels) the two rational surfaces move towards each-others until the current density peaks merge.
Fig. 4. Isosurfaces and contour plots of the current density field, J, at two different simulation times.
Fig. 5. Poincaré maps at different simulation times for a double helicity case.
Corresponding author. INFM-Politecnico di Torino, Dipartimento di Energetica, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, , Italy. Tel.: +39 0115644435; Fax: +39 0115644499.