Editorial
Critical perspectives on taxation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.05.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

Acknowledgements

The production of a special issue such as this relies heavily on the voluntary support of very busy academics and we are grateful to all the referees who gave so generously of their time and expertise to the endeavour:

Alex Arthur (University of Aberdeen, UK), Molly Scott-Cato (University of Wales Institute, Cardiff, UK), Bridgit Crawford (Pace University, US), Jesse Dillard (Portland State University), Mark Dirsmith (Penn State University, US), Elaine Doyle (University of Limerick, Ireland),

References (2)

  • D. Deák

    Legal autopoiesis theory in operation a study of the ECJ case of C-446/03 Marks & Spencer v David Halsey

    Acta Juridica Hungaria

    (2009)
  • S. Leviner

    A new era of tax enforcement: from big stick to responsive regulation

    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

    (2009)

Cited by (31)

  • Incremental improvement: Evaluating the emancipatory impact of public country-by-country reporting

    2023, Critical Perspectives on Accounting
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, many understandings of accountability only reflect elite views. This can create empowerment deficits in other relationships, undermine the legitimacy of accountants, and risk the development of disclosures which are simulacra, rather than reflections of a true and fair reality (Boden et al., 2010; Edgley & Holland, 2021; Johnston, 2015). Traditional accounting has lost legitimacy in part because, by leaving out the views of non-investors, it is unable to deliver transparency to the wider public of the information that public needs, or to serve the public good (Boden et al., 2010; Killian & O'Regan, 2020).

  • The conflict of interest in tax scholarship

    2021, Critical Perspectives on Accounting
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text