Discussion forumMental imagery in congenital prosopagnosia: A reply to Grüter et al.
Section snippets
The size of our case series
Grüter et al. (this issue) take issue with the size of our case series – namely they imply that their 2009 study may be more valid as it has a larger sample, in that Tree and Wilkie (2010) report a case series of four CP individuals, rather than a large group study. In order to respond to the criticism, it is perhaps worth putting the research of Tree and Wilkie (2010) into the wider context of the field of cognitive neuropsychology, since this is my background. This will illustrate that the
The diagnostic ‘criteria’ for classifying cases as CP
Grüter et al. used a semi-structured interview form administered by a physician or psychologist to identify or ‘diagnose’ CP. Grüter et al. also report that this interview procedure has been verified by a face recognition battery in a subgroup of CP cases, and it is implied that such a procedure might be better than that used in Tree and Wilkie (2010). I would respond with the following comments.
Firstly, we never took issue with the primary ‘diagnosis’ of CP in their initial study, although
The visual imagery assessment methodology utilised in our study
This point centres on how one might actually define and measure “mental imagery” – and I would certainly agree that this remains a controversial issue. Tree and Wilkie (2010) chose to approach the issue of mental imagery along some well-established lines of previous research. The key issue, as I see it, is the degree to which a mental ‘image’ is an experience that resembles to some extent the actual experience of perceiving the ‘imaged’ item. In other words, when someone is asked to imagine a
The control sample we used with respect to their vividness ratings
In their commentary Grüter et al. suggest that our control group has vividness ratings that are “the lowest average score for visual mental imagery ever found in a normal sample (for a metastudy see McKelvie, 1995)” (see p. 5) – but it is not clear why such a comment has been made given there were important differences between the ‘vividness’ testing of Tree and Wilkie (2010) and other research that has administered the Marks Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (MVIQ, Marks, 1973) and
References (21)
- et al.
What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia?
Brain and Cognition
(2006) - et al.
Less impairment in face imagery than face perception in early prosopagnosia
Neuropsychologia
(2003) Two types of phonological dyslexia – A contemporary review
Cortex
(2008)- et al.
Phonological dyslexia and phonological impairment: An exception to the rule?
Neuropsychologia
(2006) - et al.
Face and object imagery in congenital prosopagnosia: A case series
Cortex
(2010) - et al.
Relating visual to verbal semantic knowledge an evaluation of object recognition in prosopagnosia
Brain
(2009) - et al.
Developmental prosopagnosia: A case analysis and treatment study
Cognitive Neuropsychology
(2006) - et al.
Dissociating confidence and accuracy: Functional magnetic resonance imaging shows origins of the subjective memory experience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
(2004) - et al.
Computational modeling of reading in semantic dementia
Psychological Review
(2010) - et al.
No global processing deficit in the Navon task in 14 developmental prosopagnosics
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
(2007)
Cited by (10)
Beyond cortical localization in clinico-anatomical correlation
2012, CortexCitation Excerpt :The ventral stream is composed of associative interconnected cortical areas specialised for colour, face, object, and letter vision (the ‘what’ stream) (Ungerleider and Mishkin, 1982). Patients with an impairment of the ventral cortex and its connections present with selective loss of colour vision (i.e., achromatopsia) (Zeki, 1990), face perception (i.e., prosopagnosia) (Fox et al., 2008; Ramon and Rossion, 2010; Tree and Wilkie, 2010; Grüter et al., 2011; Tree, 2011), object perception (i.e., visual object agnosia) (Catani et al., 2003, Germine et al., 2011), and words (i.e., alexia) (Cohen et al., 2000). Similarly colour, object, and text or letter-string hallucinations are each linked to pathology causing hyperfunctioning of their respective region of cortical specialisation.
Investigating people’s metacognitive insight into their own face abilities
2023, Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyPatterns of perceptual performance in developmental prosopagnosia: An in-depth case series
2021, Cognitive NeuropsychologyFacing the facts: Naive participants have only moderate insight into their face recognition and face perception abilities
2019, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology